What's new

Make Gilgit-Baltistan the fifth province of Pakistan

.
Junagadh did not have a border with Pak. so Pak has no claim.
JK ruler went to india. again pak has no claim. Also during partition, only british india was suppsed to be partitioned on 2NT. free states like kashmir could choose and their wise king made the right choice.... baby.. aahaa.

Dude this whole ruler's wish thing is a jhol,

geographic constraints play a major role.

Only Kashmir had a choice,others had to follow geographical constraint.

And Ladkah should be populated with people from Punjab,Himachal,Uttaranchal and all and make it a proper Indian state,just like Jammu.
 
. .
Yeah, you can go nuts conducting however many you want.. Kind of similar to elections we hold in our parts every 5 years.. But you wont get a UN stamp if you are looking for that.. Any change to the UNSC resolution will require complete voting and I guess will get more than 1 veto..

You didn't do any UN administered elections, we will.
 
.
People are the only thing relevant, democracy. Demo = People.
principles of democracy will apply to indian citizens thank you

Dude this whole ruler's wish thing is a jhol,

geographic constraints play a major role.

Only Kashmir had a choice,others had to follow geographical constraint.

And Ladkah should be populated with people from Punjab,Himachal,Uttaranchal and all and make it a proper Indian state,just like Jammu.
whatever, i think pak has stolen 55% of the land and india has just 45%. Dont know why they still cry

You didn't do any UN administered elections, we will.
you can do whatever elections... but make sure you give it to BD if they choose pakistan
 
.
You didn't do any UN administered elections, we will.

No we will not. First India would have to accept UN resolution or not election or plebiscite. Even GB isn't a disputed territory if Indians don't accept UN resolution.
 
.
No we will not. First India would have to accept UN resolution or not election or plebiscite. Even GB isn't a disputed territory if Indians don't accept UN resolution.
why should we accept for a plebiscite
 
.
No we will not. First India would have to accept UN resolution or not election or plebiscite. Even GB isn't a disputed territory if Indians don't accept UN resolution.
as long as pak accepts un resolution gb is disputed
 
. . .
As long as India doesn't accept UN resolution it isn't. Enough said.
un can take their resolution and stuff it down their throat. UN also tells pak to stop expoting terror , but do you guys stop?

anyways, kashmir was signed over to india. those who want to live in kashmir should acceept indian soverignity or take a hike
 
. .
You didn't do any UN administered elections, we will.

But they will have no bearing on the UNSC resolutions.. Thats one pesky thing about these resolutions.. Either they are done in full or none at all .. So no short cuts for pakistan.. Get your forces out (and take your chinese friends with you), restore the demographics and then lets chat about the plebiscite.. Till then, we are in no hurry.. Time at the moment is on our side..
 
.
Not dadagiri. Simple rule. You GB disputed because of UN resolutions but on the other hand don't accept UN resolutions. This is unacceptable.
no no.. gb is not disputed.. it belongs to india.. P0K is also india.. both are illegally occupied by pak. Hari singh signed over kashmir which includes gb to india
 
.
Not dadagiri. Simple rule. You GB disputed because of UN resolutions but on the other hand don't accept UN resolutions. This is unacceptable.

Let me make it simple for you.. Either all of it is disputed (Including J&K, AJK, G&B) or none of it is.. Take your pick :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom