Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think J7BGI of BD airforce could easily deal with LCA( least combatable airplane). I'm really looking down on this old toy.
I know why you laugh. When J 15 (Can not carry more load than Mig21) is compared to Su 33 and Joke 20 is compared to F22, I am sure you won't laugh. I once again request you to prove your point with facts and reference.
J15 could carry at least 10 tons of payload if it took off from air strip. wake up. Tejia is a well known failed project in the world, JF17 LOOKS much better and countable.
I take trouble to educate you. Pl read the article. Do not expose your foolishness further by saying that a plne which can not handle more than 2 tone from A/C can carry 10 tons from land. No sane people will believe that (Except your country man who are as knowledgable as you) . Read the article
Chinese Media Takes Aim at J-15 Fighter | Defense News | defensenews.com
J15 is a stae of art, i don't wanna waste time arguing with you. As long as EMAL set on the indegenous aircraft, the paylord will increase sharply. Today i saw a mig-29K full load condition picture, the pyload is pathetic and pathetic. How come the Vikra flying desk so rusty with pitches?
Yes this is not an opinion of Indian but your own scientist.
I think for discussion sake, you should ignore the wanker guy and move on to a more meaningful level.
The guy is not worth wasting time on.
I will shut up a while, and tel me how Tejas is better than Grippen?I know that but he is my only good chinese friend on PDF. Any way I will ignore him now onward.
LCA can land on Highway too. You see IA did not want a pane having canard. Every design has their pro and cons. Grippen was designed for that. Still if you look at the tejas takes of with heavy load in just 11 to 12 second without canard design, it looks awesome.
Yes Grippen has a very short landing. I agree but let tejas pass high AOA test. it will have a significantly short landing I suppose.
I can't believe that those choose LCA mk1, even three years old kid knows Grippen is much better.
It trys to compare BYD with Mecedez, and most Indians members prefer BYD.
You can't be so dishonest although you are patriotic.
In my opinion, even PAF's JF17 is more reliable and mature than LCA.
There is no need to boast a jet that is nearly on the verge of abortion.
I have not started this thread to prove any superiority of Tejas over Gripen. This is just to discuss both aircraft. you have anything to contribute in this thread, you are welcome.
I will shut up a while, and tel me how Tejia is better than Grippen?
When just put jF17 in the choose bracket, it looks more fun. How do you think so HariPrasad?
How many LCA MK1 been inducted as now?
I would agree with this... basically every aeroplane will be designed with there user in mind... LCA does not need short landing like Grippen because we have many air fields to land...
But coming for a vs thread this is an advantage design which Grippen have
IAF is really lacking of planes as those old MIG are gonna retire in no time. Do you ever think seriously why IAF so reluctant to induct LCA in large number?So thats a point where LCA didnt score.... and give us more options on that.. this point alone is not necessary to prove it is bad.... your total aggregate is sum of all points you score in all subject ... not just one subject..
Success 2.0 might take another 30 years and I still doubt if it'd be a success