Kashmir The Freedom of Struggle

[Bull]

A bit like the americans depend on canada to get to alaska?
Do you not think the Situation is totally impractical in kashmir for india , do you think the pakistanis deciding to make it more practical is a good thing.

Its more practical for Kashmiris to be part of India than pakistan.

India is more prosperous and has got more diversity in culture and geography that pakistan.

 

[salman77]

Its more practical for Kashmiris to be part of India than pakistan.

India is more prosperous and has got more diversity in culture and geography that pakistan.

Forget about diversity, culture & geography. Everyone knows about the conditions of Muslims in India ( Babri Mosque, Gujrat genocide etc).

 

[Introvert]

Its more practical for Kashmiris to be part of India than pakistan.

Keep dreaming

 

[Bull]

Forget about diversity, culture & geography. Everyone knows about the conditions of Muslims in India ( Babri Mosque, Gujrat genocide etc).

Other than babri and gujarat what else fo you know?

 

[Bull]

Keep dreaming

I spoke the fact, kashmir is India's now, you are dreaming of it to be yours.

 

[Munir]

I spoke the fact, kashmir is India's now, you are dreaming of it to be yours.

So you admit that you are terrorizing entire Kashmir?

 

[Contrarian]

How is the statement that "Kashmir is India's now" a tantamount to saying that India is terrorizing Kashmir'??

 

[Bull]

I spoke the fact, kashmir is India's now, you are dreaming of it to be yours.

So you admit that you are terrorizing entire Kashmir?

How the **** did you manage that?

 

[Contrarian]

How the **** did you manage that?

lol, bull relax dude, ur getting pumped up!
Now lay off the steroids (only for a week )

 

[dabong1]

In geo-politics there are no perfect players or Saint players, I have the capacity and depth in me to accept what my country has done and what it hasnt. .

The same apply's to pakistan when it is wrong i will say so.

Just cuz we did it in Hyderbad doesnt give you the right to do it kashmir. This is not kindergarten.

After the 71 war india had kashmir in its hand but started creating the enviroment for a military struggle.The pakistani simply could not let the moment slip by and poured petrol on the flames.
Going by your logic "Just cuz we did it in kashmir doesnt give you the right to do it balouchistan".

Pakistan can act all she likes, but other than harrassing india with some terrorist bombings and a few half hearted attacks, there is no way pakistan can do anything to India
If you believe Pakistan defeated India three times shows your grasp on history and the level propaganda ingraved in you.

Yeah yeah every bombing in india is pakistans fault.
India outnumbers pakistan 6/1 in everything AND after all the wars its still standing.
Just think if pakistan outnumbered india 6/1 how long do you think india would have lasted?
"If you believe india defeated pakistan three times it shows your grasp of history and the level propaganda ingraved in you".

 

[dabong1]

Its more practical for Kashmiris to be part of India than pakistan.
India is more prosperous and has got more diversity in culture and geography that pakistan.

Why do we not ask the people of kashmir if your so sure.

 

[Contrarian]

After the 71 war india had kashmir in its hand but started creating the enviroment for a military struggle.The pakistani simply could not let the moment slip by and poured petrol on the flames.
Going by your logic "Just cuz we did it in kashmir doesnt give you the right to do it balouchistan".

India did not create the environment for a military struggle. It was Pakistan, who knew that it could not match India militarily and could not wrest Kashmir militarily so the policy of 'deah by a thousand cuts'. The mujahideen got free after Soviet left Afghanistan and Pakistan painted India as an ideal destination for them.

Its the capacity of the country. Pakistan cannot win a direct war with India, so it uses proxy war, India cannot attack Pakistan directly just for teh proxy war, so it starts its own proxy war. Its the capacity of the country.

Yeah yeah every bombing in india is pakistans fault.

Not every bombing, but 90%. None of the terrorist orgs in India would have any effectiveness if Pakistan did not support them.

India outnumbers pakistan 6/1 in everything AND after all the wars its still standing.

The world has never let India carry on the wars till the last extent. Everytime the world has made the war stop.

Just think if pakistan outnumbered india 6/1 how long do you think india would have lasted?

Its not how long, it would have lasted, its not India's non competence because of which Pakistan exists, its because of the world pressure, UN, etc. apart from internal political considerations, this is a democracy, political parties need to get re-elected. On the other hand let me tell you, if Pakistan was big as India, then it would have gone through the same fate as it has in its own land, near bankruptcy, etc, etc. Because even though you would have had the resources, you would not have managed them, Pakistan still would have been a dictatorship.

"If you believe india defeated pakistan three times it shows your grasp of history and the level propaganda ingraved in you".

Do you deny the fact that every time the war ended in a cease fire, India ALWAYS had the upper hand. We have lost on the negotiating table what we have won in the battle ground.

The decisive victories however in which some tangible profit could be obtained was in 1971. Do you dispute that India still did not achieve victory then?
The rest wars have ended in a cease fire but with India on teh upper hand.
We have more vastly superior numbers than Pakistan, it would take an exceedingly incompetent general to lose the war against such an enemy. The theory that 1 Pakistani soldier=10 Indian soldier does not hold any ground. What happens when the 11th soldier comes?

 

[Adux]

The same apply's to pakistan when it is wrong i will say so.





After the 71 war india had kashmir in its hand but started creating the enviroment for a military struggle.The pakistani simply could not let the moment slip by and poured petrol on the flames.
Going by your logic "Just cuz we did it in kashmir doesnt give you the right to do it balouchistan".



Yeah yeah every bombing in india is pakistans fault.
India outnumbers pakistan 6/1 in everything AND after all the wars its still standing.
Just think if pakistan outnumbered india 6/1 how long do you think india would have lasted?
"If you believe india defeated pakistan three times it shows your grasp of history and the level propaganda ingraved in you".

I dont care two hoots for Balochistan, Do whatever you have to do to keep your country intact. We have the capacity to do whatever we want to, unfortunatly you dont and therefore you cant
India never wanted to WIPE OUT Pakistan from the face of the earth..lol
india would have lost right , cuz 1 pakistani = 10 indians...lol
You are the ones who are always crying US didnt do that for us, we didnt get enough money, we were outnumbered and stuff..Stop bickering...Shut up and Fight. if you can't please go on your own sweet way stop bothering us
People of Kashmir has spoken they have an elected government last time I checked AJK or Azad Kashmir has appointed guy from Islamabad.

 

[Contrarian]

Why do we not ask the people of kashmir if your so sure.

Kashmiris can be asked about this, if terrorism ceases. Till that time, they sure did defy the terrorists and came out to vote last time.

 

[Adux]

Kashmiris can be asked about this, if terrorism ceases. Till that time, they sure did defy the terrorists and came out to vote last time.

mishraji,

They have already spoken with the last elections, The whole world has acknowleged. Village defence Commitee's are slaughtering miltants on sight