RollingStones
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 352
- Reaction score
- 0
You are dumber than i thought!
Dude!
i today bet here that you DO NOT know a tosh about the word terrorism (the literal and philosophical meaning to be precise). Why, i'll come to this later.
As per indian claim the Mumbai attack was orchestrated by LeT (an outfit whose mission is to liberate Kashmir from the indian atrocities). Now is it that difficult for a buffoon to understand this simple phenomenon?
Terrorism is vague and at the same time very very specific. Vague in a sense that i dont understand why would National Liberation Front (FLN) target its own people in order to liberate Algeria, nor would i understand why would 'Muslim' Talibans target Muslims in/outside Pakistan?
But then i think a bit (this bit was small, very small) and know that FLN killed Algerians in the name of terrorism because in the words of Roger Trinquier; The goal of terrorism is control of the populace, and (means of) terrorism is a particularly appropriate weapon, since it aims directly at the inhabitant. In the street, at work, at home, the citizen lives continually under the threat of violent death. In the presence of this permanent danger surrounding him, he has the depressing feeling of being an isolated and defenceless target. The fact that public authority and the police are no longer capable of ensuring his security adds to his distress. He loses confidence in the state whose inherent mission it is to guarantee his safety. He is more and more drawn to the side f terrorists, who alone are able to protect him.
The intended objective, which is to cause the population to vacillate is thus attained. What characterizes modern terrorism, and makes for its basic strength, is the slaughter of generally defenceless persons.'
Do you actually think AQ is against the American population? Or is the American policman attitude that AQ is concerned about? Now as we all know it is the latter, then why would AQ bring down the Twin Towers and not take on the US military headon?
But then you know what, imbeciles might have difficulty understanding certain simple equations of life!
Also we also dont know that thickheaded Muslims (most of whom form the backbone of terrorists) consider Jews as their primary enemy.
Also we dont know that one of the aim of terrorism is to bring the 'cause' into international limelight. Now how to do so - the more the damage, massacre, pain and outcry (kill a Jew or Yank and you get all of these, the most!!) the more the projection. Now if i remember reading my American Field Manual on Terrorism correctly, i did read somewhere in the book that terrorists do seek PUBLICITY and what any media does after an attack is indeed 'beneficial' to a terrorists' cause. But then we dont know that, do we!!
So,
Solve the Kashmir Issue and not only you'll put a stop to acts like mumbai attack but would also bring peace to the entire region - that's a guarantee!
N.B. May these would also help:
Lebanonwire.com | India, Pakistan: Islamabad's Kashmiri Militant Strategy
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/29/world/asia/29intel.html?_r=2
etc, etc
P.S. More Shutup Calls would be provided on request
Oh...really? That undermines the American government's constitutional obligation to protect us wherever we are. Well..if it is LeTs stated policy to achieve maximum publicity, in your words, by going after us or just using us a tool to achieve their aims, then it is time to work with Indians to get rid of this scourge. Perhaps, some of the drones need to be shifted over to Pakistan's eastern border? We are aware of why militants do what it is they do. But we refuse to be their publicity fodder and reserve all rights to blow them to oblivion and also set an example for anyone trying to do something akin to what has been done before. Seriously...your justification for terrorism is...extra terrestrial.
Yet for all you say, a non-violent Tibetan freedom cry has had more traction than the Kashmiri cause.
Do you actually expect India and the world (including US support) to solve the kashmiri problem because you have this tool of a group called LeT causing mayhem? Or, do you mean to say that killing people is the way to promote/advertise a cause?? Are these your opinions or are you just professing to explain why it is what is that terrorists do? Lets be clear here: you cannot make the world listen to guns: it is not going to happen. If you and the terrorists believe this, you are on the losing side.
America acting as the world's policeman is a nonsense generated by people who thought that America was behind some of the things happening around the world. America did not even want to be part of world wars, until it was dragged in by the freaking Japanese. America did not even step in to help the jews persecuted by the germans, until much later. Jewish folks are pissed off about this to even this day. In other wars, heavy lobbying by one party or the other is why America got dragged in. Coupled with misplaced ideals like helping out the oppressed has landed America in more soup than can be imagined. Terrorists use n number of causes to rationalize their insidious behavior. Are we going to sit around and rationalize them or make them vaporware is a question that can be easily answered?
Last edited:
let her bark ..! jaha 9 deshdrohi hai waha 1 aur sahi...! who gives damn to what this loser activist say..i know indians don't! may be ppl in our neighbourhood..! And even by that little popularity accros the border what will she acheive?
to reply me..!! that will not change anything..!
