JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,.

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,.,

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,.,

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,

 

[MastanKhan]

@denel

Hi,

I think you will like this.

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,

 

[Bratva]

.,.,.,
View attachment 843094

Are these the Drop tanks of JF-17? If so does it mean JF-17 made a emergency landing for unknown reasons?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1523700731018379264

 

[Mrc]

Could be any aircraft not just jft

 

[SD 10]

Are these the Drop tanks of JF-17? If so does it mean JF-17 made a emergency landing for unknown reasons?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1523700731018379264

doesn`t mirage drop tanks also have these wings type structures?

 

[Mrc]

.,.,
View attachment 842833

Block 3 is a beast

 

[Beast]

Most definitely agreed. But i know the chinese too well; they can cut corners on alloys as well. Problem is who is to validate the alloys or even the stress tests?

The classical case of good enough in such machines is defnitely not good enough.

Absolute BS with your usual anti Chinese ranting. You think buyers or Pakistanis are dumb not to conduct their own trial to evaluate a products for their spec? China has been selling weapons , airplane , warship and armoury for decades.


Cut corners? Do you mean Boeing US or Japan?

The emerging 737 Max scandal, explained

It’s more than bad software.

www.vox.com

Mitsubishi Electric used fake-data program in years of deception

Lack of consequences perpetuates insular corporate culture

asia.nikkei.com

Agreed,
and this may happen, (unlikely through).

JF-17 was a export oriented model for Chendgu, and they would do everything possible to ensure it's functionality.
PAF has enough experience in maybe not designing but maintaining aircraft; the MRO does perform substantial testing before go ahead.

All in all, the QA could be an issue, however the more we debate, the less likely it becomes.



Seriously ... I mean ... really ...
Have you ever even seen an airplane in detail ?

The closest your analogy lands is if someone was calculating wing loading, and even that is done in different dimensions.

Do not trust this imposter words. All he do is pretending to be expert on Chinese and spread his usual anti China propaganda here.

 

[denel]

Absolute BS with your usual anti Chinese ranting. You think buyers or Pakistanis are dumb not to conduct their own trial to evaluate a products for their spec? China has been selling weapons , airplane , warship and armoury for decades.


Cut corners? Do you mean Boeing US or Japan?

The emerging 737 Max scandal, explained

It’s more than bad software.

www.vox.com

Mitsubishi Electric used fake-data program in years of deception

Lack of consequences perpetuates insular corporate culture

asia.nikkei.com

Do not trust this imposter words. All he do is pretending to be expert on Chinese and spread his usual anti China propaganda here.

Reported for personal attacks.