What's new

JF-17 Block-3 -- Updates, News & Discussion

Nope, that is the HUD fitted in current versions, offers 25 degree FOV. The blk 3 had a holographic HUD that looked similar to the one fitted in j-10C.




Dual launcher will become a standard fit among all thunders if and when needed.
View attachment 579670

Is the fact that PAF has not deployed the Dual-rack SD10 launchers due to the fact that the current radar/computer combination can only guide 2 BVR AAMs at the same time?
 
Number of Missiles carried has no relevance to the ability to simultaneously guide number of missiles.
 
Number of Missiles carried has no relevance to the ability to simultaneously guide number of missiles.

It’s typical for platform to be able to carry max number of simultaneously guided by radar

Tomcat Phoenix , f-16 etc so jf is expected otherwise you have capability from radar perspective but not from platform can exploit
 
In his final speech to Air Headquarters, the outgoing Chief of Air Staff (CAS) of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF), Air Chief Marshal (ACM) Sohail Aman announced that the design of the JF-17 Block-III was finalized after a period of “two-and-a-half years”.

The JF-17 Block-III is the first major development of the JF-17 Thunder, which is co-produced by Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) and the Aviation Industry Group of China (AVIC). In February 2018, the PAF announced that it raised its sixth JF-17 unit – i.e. the No. 28 “Phoenix” Squadron – in Baluchistan.

PAC rolled-out a total of 100 JF-17 Block-I and Block-IIs for the PAF. Of the Block-IIs, approximately half of them are also equipped with in-flight refueling (IFR) probes for air-to-air refueling (AAR). These IFR JF-17s appear to have been allocated to newer (i.e. No. 28 and No. 14) and older (No. 16) units.

The announcement follows reports in January from Chinese sources claiming that the Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group (CAIG) has pushed the JF-17 Block-III program to the “preliminary design stage”.

Although the former PAF CAS did not outline the Block-III’s slated subsystems, earlier PAF statements and reports outlined that the Block-III will include an active electronically-scanned array radar, a new onboard avionics suite, updated electronic warfare and electronic countermeasures system and, at least in 2015, a helmet-mounted display and sight with high off-boresight air-to-air missile.

ACM Aman asserted that the JF-17 Block-III will fulfill the PAF’s requirements for an affordable high-tech aircraft, filling a gap (which he acknowledged) in the area. ACM Aman also urged forthcoming – and other future – PAF leaders to maintain a fighter force level of 400 through the foreseeable future.

Currently, the PAF plans to procure 50 JF-17 Block-IIIs, with production commencing in 2019 or 2020.

Besides another 12 JF-17 Block-II (to keep PAC’s production lines warm through 2018), it is unclear if the PAF will procure additional JF-17s, though it would be a rational outcome in the long-term given the increasing age of the mainstay PAF fleet and, in parallel, the dearth of high-tech fighter options.

Separately, the PAF has also taken delivery of its first twin-seater JF-17B. PAC will receive two of the three JF-17Bs for testing and, presumably, promotional purposes with prospective buyers. The PAF has not yet committed itself to procuring JF-17Bs.

ACM Sohail Aman was formally succeeded by ACM Mujahid Anwar on 19 March 2018. Reflecting on his three-year tenure as the PAF CAS, ACM Aman noted serving “was a matter of pride”. In a separate speech, ACM Aman outlined that the induction of four JF-17 squadrons was a pivotal piece of “Force Goal 2030”.

Under Force Goal 2030, the PAF achieved completing PAF Bholari, a new major operating base in Sindh, for strengthening the country’s maritime airpower. During ACM Aman’s tenure, the PAF also established the Airpower Centre of Excellence (ACE) and the Air University Campus on Kamra, with the latter to serve a leading role in bringing Project Azm, the PAF’s next-generation fighter program, to fruition.

Source: QUWA

Seems very promising, excellent!!!
 
IMG_4156.JPG


IMG_4154.JPG


To add additional pylon in outer wing add additional steel rib going all the way to the tip to strengthening it and also extend existing steel frame all the way to the tip of the wing like f-16 and add new pylon underwing

Existing steel ribs are show but need one more going past the existing pylon attachment to the tip to strengthen outer wing

May add additional weight but for few lbs it’s may be worth it bring total pylon attachment to 9

add another two under Intake to take it to 11 like f-16

Or another option just increase internal fuel capacity from 2330 kg to ~2700/2800 kg and then no need for under wing drop tanks just centerline with all wing pylons use for weapons like in current configuration

Looks like this may be the option with under intake pylons for pods
 
Last edited:
View attachment 579698

View attachment 579699

To add additional pylon in outer wing add additional steel rib going all the way to the tip to strengthening it and also extend existing steel frame all the way to the tip of the wing like f-16 and add new pylon underwing

Existing steel ribs are show but need one more going past the existing pylon attachment to the tip to strengthen outer wing

May add additional weight but for few lbs it’s may be worth it bring total pylon attachment to 9

add another two under Intake to take it to 11 like f-16

Or another option just increase internal fuel capacity from 2330 kg to ~2700/2800 kg and then no need for under wing drop tanks just centerline with all wing pylons use for weapons like in current configuration

Looks like this may be the option with under intake pylons for pods
Its so Beautiful :smitten::smitten::smitten:
 
View attachment 579698

View attachment 579699

To add additional pylon in outer wing add additional steel rib going all the way to the tip to strengthening it and also extend existing steel frame all the way to the tip of the wing like f-16 and add new pylon underwing

Existing steel ribs are show but need one more going past the existing pylon attachment to the tip to strengthen outer wing

May add additional weight but for few lbs it’s may be worth it bring total pylon attachment to 9

add another two under Intake to take it to 11 like f-16

Or another option just increase internal fuel capacity from 2330 kg to ~2700/2800 kg and then no need for under wing drop tanks just centerline with all wing pylons use for weapons like in current configuration

Looks like this may be the option with under intake pylons for pods
Just getting 1 more pod hardpoint & internal fuel will do the trick with CFTs
If CFTs not feasible that exploring 2 additional points on the wings can be considered to bring the number 9-10

Beyond 4 BVR missiles, law of diminishing returns would kick in. JF-17 does not have the stamina for a prolonged fight. It is more of a shoot-and-scoot type, being a light weight aircraft. Its strength lies in high sortie rate.
Doctrines are changing..
The future is in high firing rate of BVR...as counter measures improve
https://www.defensenews.com/digital...ytheon-unveils-new-air-to-air-missile-design/
 
Just getting 1 more pod hardpoint & internal fuel will do the trick with CFTs
If CFTs not feasible that exploring 2 additional points on the wings can be considered to bring the number 9-10


Doctrines are changing..
The future is in high firing rate of BVR...as counter measures improve
https://www.defensenews.com/digital...ytheon-unveils-new-air-to-air-missile-design/
Nope!.. disagree; you are quoting the Soviet strategy of saturation; in very high EW scenario 1,2 or many wont matter; what matters is how well is your system to countermeasures; it has always been a cat and mouse game with cat being the missile design.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom