SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Yeah bruv,,, they really aren't
As soon as IR falls they declare independence and separate
You would be lucky if the Kurds, maybe Azeri and Arabs don't do the same thing
You guys are in a real pickle because the so called opposition isn't after one thing it's a Hodge podge of ideological and ethnic fault lines with only the Murtad section being focused on by the west and expat monarchists
Well, you're right that Iran will be torn apart into so-called "ethnic" entities at the slightest hiatus in the exercise of power by the central government. Ira's existential enemies - zionist regime, USA and EU will absolutely make sure of that. They will not miss the historic opportunity offered to them this time around.
However, please do not assume for a second that the majority of Kurdish Iranians, Azari Iranians and even Baluch Iranians have separatist tendencies. They don't. The thing is though, that when the central state collapses, those groups which enjoy foreign backing from major powers, which are well organized and armed, are the ones which will call the shots and impose their agenda on the majority.
Hence why a fall of the Islamic Republic will be fatal to Iran as a unified nation-state and as a historic civilization.
Btw take a look at the IR's own statistics on this - most of the people they have arrested are monarchists. So much for murtad exile western LA blah blah blah crap you Londonestanis love to talk about lmao. Here they are in Baluchistan.
The audio here sounds dubbed. Those individuals in Zahedan, a minority like the rest of the rioters, are extremely unlikely to have chanted pro-monarchy slogans.
You repeating it ad infinitum won't make it happen, just like it didn't happen in 1906, 1921, 1953, or 1979. And the day I take Iran lessons from an exiled Londonestani is the day pigs fly. We are not a country that arose out of colonialism you know
Key difference being, at those dates you mention major imperialist powers did not have the territorial disintegration of Iran high on their agenda. Today they do.
Here's an insight among many into said agenda:
https://besacenter.org/dismantle-iran-now/
After WW2, Iran got lucky not to lose Azarbaijan and Kordestan. Hadn't it been for Truman's ultimatum to Stalin in 1946, Iran would have lost these two provinces. Again, this wasn't the result of non-existing sympathies for separatism among the majority of Kurdish or Azari Iranians, but of foreign intervention, back then by the USSR. Today, NATO and the zionists are hell bent on intervening to break Iran into pieces.
What is more, this goal of balkanizing Iran is part of a broader agenda pursued by the zio-American empire since 9-11, 2001. They have methodically been orchestrating the destruction of nation-states in the broader region: Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen. Not only will Iran not be an exception, in their eyes Iran in fact represent the big prize.
This is what early 21st century zio-American policy in West Asia is about:
"Greater Israel": The Zionist Plan for the Middle East - Global Research
When viewed in the current context, the war on Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing wars on Syria and Iraq, the war on Yemen, must be understood in relation to the Zionist Plan for the Middle East
www.globalresearch.ca
Last edited: