TRADE STARTED BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND ISRAEL

[villageidiot]

trade should be separate from politics ,especially if the country benefits from trade
US and China are enemies..but they still trade..same with India and China

If Pakistan and India are not trading,it can be understood as they fought wars and have dispute over Kashmir

But what Pakistan should have bitterness toward Israel when most of the Ummah are becoming friends of Israel ?

Ummah is not the moral compass. And financial gain isn't the sole barometer in intl. relations, let alone the morality of accepting Israel.

If jews are a problem, why Pakistanis are selective ?

Google is founded by jews..Youtube is owned by Google..will paksitan ban youtube/google or youtuber forgo their monetization income ..cos it is haram to take money from Jews ?

Stop toeing the zionist line by conflating zionists with all Jews. There are many many Jews who condemn Israel. It's jahil mullahs that do that and zionist that do that. That allows for the antisemitism and holocaust card to be played.

Jews and Muslims got along just swell for almost all of history. Judaism is the closest religion to Islam. It's the zionist project that created the enmity.

shosha for distracting focus

• Focus only on election in last 30 days

You forgot to give a name to this shosha?
May I suggest "Yahudi Sazish Shosha"

Another Reminder

https://twitter.com/x/status/1642138811558686720

 

[hatehs]

trade should be separate from politics ,especially if the country benefits from trade
US and China are enemies..but they still trade..same with India and China

If Pakistan and India are not trading,it can be understood as they fought wars and have dispute over Kashmir

But what Pakistan should have bitterness toward Israel when most of the Ummah are becoming friends of Israel ?


If jews are a problem, why Pakistanis are selective ?

Google is founded by jews..Youtube is owned by Google..will paksitan ban youtube/google or youtuber forgo their monetization income ..cos it is haram to take money from Jews ?

Height of jahiliyat in this post.

- US has initiated sanctions against Chinese companies and products
- India has banned Chinese apps
- There are global sanctions against Russia for it's war in Ukraine

My point? Pakistan isn't the only country using. Trade has always been related to politics across the world, but unfortunately, some people (mainly Hindus) want to pretend Pakistan is the first country to withhold trade as a political device.

To respond to your second question, which one again, shows that critics of Pakistan's Israel policy are through and through jahils and midwits, no, Israel has not been boycotted because it is filled with Jews.

Pakistan is willing to trade with Yahudis but not Hindus right across the border ?

Hindus are announcing boycotts of local Indian Muslims and torching their stores in India, but crying about trade with Pakistanis. Bizarre people!

 

[YeBeWarned]

Bro, even the west is slowly moving away from that. smh

What is going on?

Israel as a Country is going nowhere, almost entire ME is trading with them, so why can't we ? Situation in Pakistan is going down hill by the day, we need allies not enemies.

 

[villageidiot]

Israel as a Country is going nowhere, almost entire ME is trading with them, so why can't we ? Situation in Pakistan is going down hill by the day, we need allies not enemies.

Diplomatic non-recognition is not about making the country disappear but putting a price on your recognition. It's another matter how much leverage our non-recognition gives us, esp as everyone else is recognizing them. My point is there is no tangible benefit and we are negotiating from a position of weakness. Because Qaroon ka khazana isn't awaiting us, for when you do recognize them, as some here seem to believe.
"We will get latest tech from Israel"
"We will export stuff to Israel and make tons of money"

As if we couldn't have done that with every other country in the world, if we wanted to. Our embassy staff is Israel is going to be sitting on their asses just like our embassy staff in literally every country they are in.

There's no need to recognize them. Right now, these mofos incharge are at "I'll suck your dick for 20 bucks" level of desperation like a junkie. They should not be allowed to negotiate anything.

 

[python-000]

 

[El Sidd]

Pakistan denies it has trade ties with Israel after Jewish businessman touts export

Fishel Benkhald tweets video showing containers of produce during visit to Israeli market; Islamabad declares it has no intention of developing relations with Jerusalem

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[YeBeWarned]

Diplomatic non-recognition is not about making the country disappear but putting a price on your recognition. It's another matter how much leverage our non-recognition gives us, esp as everyone else is recognizing them. My point is there is no tangible benefit and we are negotiating from a position of weakness. Because Qaroon ka khazana isn't awaiting us, for when you do recognize them, as some here seem to believe.
"We will get latest tech from Israel"
"We will export stuff to Israel and make tons of money"

As if we couldn't have done that with every other country in the world, if we wanted to. Our embassy staff is Israel is going to be sitting on their asses just like our embassy staff in literally every country they are in.

There's no need to recognize them. Right now, these mofos incharge are at "I'll suck your dick for 20 bucks" level of desperation like a junkie. They should not be allowed to negotiate anything.

Relax buddy, its just trade... you are doing a lot of assumptions here, in Pakistan things move slower than snails, so trade is a good start, by the time we officially accept the trading ties with Israel it will be time for Imam Mahdi to show up. Pakistan should trade with every country in this world, we need financial stability for our people.

 

[Muhammad Saftain Anjum]

At least the Iranians have a history assisting other Muslims regardless of sect unlike the eunuchs running rest of the Islamic world.

Cut to March 1994. On a winter morning, with the Elbruz Mountains overlooking Tehran airport still under snow, braving cold winds, a special Indian military plane touched down. On board was an ailing Dinesh Singh, then External Affairs Minister, along with three others. Barely able to walk, Singh had been dragged out of a hospital bed to deliver an urgent letter from Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao to Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. Incidentally, this was the last such tour in the 50-year diplomatic career of Singh.

Having mortgaged its gold reserves two years ago, India was on the economic brink while Russia was still licking its wounds after the break-up of the Soviet Union. The Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC), supported by influential Western nations, was pushing a resolution at the UN Commission Human Rights (UNCHR), later rechristened as Human Rights Council, to condemn India for human right violations in Kashmir. The resolution, with UNCHR approval, was to be referred to the UN Security Council for initiating economic sanctions and other punitive measures against India. As in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in the OIC, too, decisions are by consensus.

Recalling how India was saved from disgrace, former ambassador and expert on Iranian affairs M K Bhadrakumar believes that Rao had shrewdly prevailed on Iran to abstain from voting. “Once there is no consensus in the OIC, the resolution was bound to fall through,” Bhadrakumar pointed out.

The Iranians had no clue to the Indian Minister’s mission. Casting aside protocol, Iranian Foreign Minister Dr. Ali Akbar Velayati was at the airport when Singh alighted. Velayati, asked what on earth could be of such momentous importance for Singh to risk a perilous journey in his precarious condition. In reply, Dinesh Singh smilingly handed over a demarche.

In the course of the day, he went through his “Kashmir brief” diligently in meetings with his Iranian interlocutors, namely, Velayati, President Rafsanjani and Iranian Majlis Speaker Nateq-Nouri. By evening, Singh retuned to his hospital bed in Delhi, but with an assurance from President Rafsanjani to Prime Minister Rao “that Iran will do all it can do to ensure that no harm comes to India.”

What Iran gained by obliging India is an abiding mystery. Only after 72 anxious hours did Delhi learn that Iran had killed the OIC move to table the resolution.

How Iran saved India – in 1994

Dubai: India-Iran relations are in the grip of a noticeable chill. Ties between the two going downhill became evident, for the first time, when India did not stand by Iran and abstained from voting in the UN General Assembly on a Canada-sponsored resolution against its human right violations...

www.milligazette.com

You pan Islamists are disgusting species happened to Pakistan.

 

[AA_]

Cut to March 1994. On a winter morning, with the Elbruz Mountains overlooking Tehran airport still under snow, braving cold winds, a special Indian military plane touched down. On board was an ailing Dinesh Singh, then External Affairs Minister, along with three others. Barely able to walk, Singh had been dragged out of a hospital bed to deliver an urgent letter from Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao to Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. Incidentally, this was the last such tour in the 50-year diplomatic career of Singh.

Having mortgaged its gold reserves two years ago, India was on the economic brink while Russia was still licking its wounds after the break-up of the Soviet Union. The Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC), supported by influential Western nations, was pushing a resolution at the UN Commission Human Rights (UNCHR), later rechristened as Human Rights Council, to condemn India for human right violations in Kashmir. The resolution, with UNCHR approval, was to be referred to the UN Security Council for initiating economic sanctions and other punitive measures against India. As in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in the OIC, too, decisions are by consensus.

Recalling how India was saved from disgrace, former ambassador and expert on Iranian affairs M K Bhadrakumar believes that Rao had shrewdly prevailed on Iran to abstain from voting. “Once there is no consensus in the OIC, the resolution was bound to fall through,” Bhadrakumar pointed out.

The Iranians had no clue to the Indian Minister’s mission. Casting aside protocol, Iranian Foreign Minister Dr. Ali Akbar Velayati was at the airport when Singh alighted. Velayati, asked what on earth could be of such momentous importance for Singh to risk a perilous journey in his precarious condition. In reply, Dinesh Singh smilingly handed over a demarche.

In the course of the day, he went through his “Kashmir brief” diligently in meetings with his Iranian interlocutors, namely, Velayati, President Rafsanjani and Iranian Majlis Speaker Nateq-Nouri. By evening, Singh retuned to his hospital bed in Delhi, but with an assurance from President Rafsanjani to Prime Minister Rao “that Iran will do all it can do to ensure that no harm comes to India.”

What Iran gained by obliging India is an abiding mystery. Only after 72 anxious hours did Delhi learn that Iran had killed the OIC move to table the resolution.

How Iran saved India – in 1994

Dubai: India-Iran relations are in the grip of a noticeable chill. Ties between the two going downhill became evident, for the first time, when India did not stand by Iran and abstained from voting in the UN General Assembly on a Canada-sponsored resolution against its human right violations...

www.milligazette.com

You pan Islamists are disgusting species happened to Pakistan.

And you’re a co*ksucker who rdeliberately omits history certain events and cherry picks others to misinform people.

Nice try eunuch, GHQ policies pushed Iran into India. The mass killings of Shia religious leaders along with foolishly killing an Iranian diplomat and then claiming they didn’t know who was behind the killings, when clearly ISI backed killer teams were the ones doing it.

@Muhammed45 @Mehdipersian @SalarHaqq
@Big Tank @AlKardai @Dalit

Sadeq Ganji - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Muhammad Saftain Anjum]

And you’re a co*ksucker who rdeliberately omits history certain events and cherry picks others to misinform people.

Nice try eunuch, GHQ policies pushed Iran into India. The mass killings of Shia religious leaders along with foolishly killing an Iranian diplomat and then claiming they didn’t know who was behind the killings, when clearly ISI backed killer teams were the ones doing it.

@Muhammed45 @Mehdipersian @SalarHaqq
@Big Tank @AlKardai @Dalit

Sadeq Ganji - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

In March 2001, Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan member Sheikh Haq Nawaz Jhangvi was convicted and hanged by a Pakistani court for the assassination.
From the source you qouted.
During the Afghan -USSR war, your ummah brothers started funding the secterian war in Pakistan.This brought huge bloodshed in Pakistan.

The Saudi Arabia and Iran Factor in Sectarian Conflict of Pakistan: Critical and Analytics Study in Historic and Contemporary Scenario

This research will take a close look at the often unseen and unheard situation of these countries. In terms of Saudi Iranian relations, this quantitative research examines Pakistan’s complexity of sectarian conflicts and divisions. Pakistan has emerged as a country more vulnerable to internal...

www.scirp.org

"It is worth noting that Pakistan has been one of the threats for Iran-Saudi sectarian battle, where both the sides have funded their proxies that often jeopardize Islamabad’s internal security dilemma "
"The assistance provided to various Shiite and Sunni enterprises in Pakistan by Iran, Saudi Arabia, and a few other Muslim worldwide locations led in the emergence of sectarian proxy warfare."
You Arab and Iranian @ss lickers are all same disgusting species

GHQ policies pushed Iran into India.

Wrong
Iran started building her ties with India because she saw better economic future with India than with Pakistan.
The religious chooran is only sold to your types who have zero understanding of how world politics works.
Iran-India trade stands at USD 2.10 billion as of FY 2020-21 data.

Arabs and Iran doing trade with Muslim Killer India is all fine but slightest hint of Pakistan's trade with their enemies sets your @ss on fire and in your frustration,you want blood of our people.

In the end,i will say again

You Arab and Iranian @sslickers are disgusting species happened to Pakistan.

 

[El Sidd]

Pakistan denies it has trade ties with Israel after Jewish businessman touts export

Fishel Benkhald tweets video showing containers of produce during visit to Israeli market; Islamabad declares it has no intention of developing relations with Jerusalem

www.timesofisrael.com

from the article:

Benkhald sent food samples to three businesspeople in Jerusalem and Haifa through the United Arab Emirates, where he met them at food exhibitions, according to the Commerce Ministry. The ministry said the shipment was not supported by the Pakistan government and no banking or official channel was involved.


Illustrative: A Pakistani peace delegation visits the Western wall in Jerusalem’s Old City, September 21, 2022. (Ash Obel/Times of Israel)
The American Jewish Congress earlier welcomed news of the shipment, saying it could have wider implications for the two countries’ economies and the region at large. It said Benkhald was at the heart of a small but growing Pakistani kosher industry exporting food to different destinations.

But there were mixed opinions in Pakistan about Benkhald’s venture. Shireen Mazari, a key leader from ex-prime minister Imran Khan’s party and former minister for human rights, criticized the government and asked how a Pakistani citizen was exporting to Israel directly and visiting the country on a Pakistani passport.

But an interfaith representative from the current administration, Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi, said Benkhald had been permitted to visit Israel during Khan’s tenure.

 

[Dalit]

American Jewish Congress Statement on Trade Between the State of #Israel and #Pakistan.

PRESS RELEASE: American Jewish Congress Statement on Trade Between Israel and Pakistan - American Jewish Congress

New York, NY, March 30, 2023 - Business and trade have the power to bring ideas and people closer, and this week we have seen major steps taken in Israel, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates to expand prosperity and opportunity for everyone in the Middle East. This week, the first shipment of...

ajcongress.org

https://twitter.com/x/status/1641835570572795910

@Maula Jatt @PakSarZameen47 @Menace2Society@Pakstallion @Vapnope @Areesh @DESERT FIGHTER @Desert Fox 1 @N.Siddiqui @Norwegian@TNT @Imad.Khan @Dalit @ziaulislam@EternalMortal @lastofthepatriots @WarKa DaNG@Warking @Talwar e Pakistan @WinterFangs@kingQamaR @Menace2Society @Indus Pakistan @Ghazwa-e-Hind @Norwegian @PakFactor @akramishaqkhan @Zornix @pakpride00090 @Abid123 @Goritoes @SecularNationalist @PakistaniandProud @PAKISTANFOREVER @Dual Wielder @Great Janjua @ahaider97 @PakFactor @Sayfullah
@SaadH @villageidiot @Olympus81
@Mobius 1 @General Dong @Genghis khan1 @alphapak @RealNapster @Kharral @Mobius 1 @Goenitz @Muhammad Saftain Anjum @AA_ @Mobius 1 @Great Janjua

You have to understand what the Israelis are really after here. They are longing for recognition from all major Islamic nations in the world. That also includes Pakistan. A nation of 230 million people and a nuclear power. After receiving recognition from the bulk of GCC nations the Israelis are now yearning for more recognition within the Islamic world. Remember that nations like Turkey, Morocco and others already have diplomatic and trading relations with Israel for many years.

There is not a shred of doubt that recognition from Pakistan will absolutely boost the Israeli cause. It will give the Israelis much confidence to go one step further. The headlines would be that after GCC nations another major Islamic nation has joined the pro-Israel bandwagon. It makes sense from an Israeli perspective to continue the charm offensive. Even spread lies to force Pakistan to react.

 

[AA_]

Consensus even within Pakistan is that you have lost Kashmir and India has won (though the Indians have always dealt with it strictly as an internal matter). Better you focus on Pakistan and what’s left of it

There is no consensus Indian. A few sellouts can tell the world that they’ve given up. Clearly the recent killings of dotheads in IOK says otherwise. Beautifully done might I add!

Now hop off my nuts stinky brown shit boy

 

[ProudThamizhan]

There is no consensus Indian. A few sellouts can tell the world that they’ve given up. Clearly the recent killings of dotheads in IOK says otherwise. Beautifully done might I add!

Now hop off my nuts stinky brown shit boy

regardless, you are wrong. You lost it