SO out of a total netto land (excluding, roads, railways, lakes etc) jews by 1943 owned 1,514,247 metric dunums, of which 864,247 were purchased after 1920. Palestinians on the other hand owned 24,670,455 metric dunums. In percentage that would be 5.78% jewish and 94.22% Palestinian.
Palestinians were Jews and Arabs prior to 1948.
The region was ruled by the Ottomans, then conquered by the British (not the Arabs).
The Arabs (or Palestinians) owned ****, virtually all of the land was in ottoman trusts that Arabs sat on and "owned" but they never purchased the land, ever.
The British divested, allocating most of the land to Arabs, and some to Jews.
The Zionists only made small claims to the land even though the San Remo promised them all of Palestine (including what is now Jordan, which is 70% Palestinian).
The Jews were promised a state prior to the Arabs, and the Jews land was further divided up after Britain caved into Arab demands and installed a minority Hashemite ethnicity to rule over the Palestinian majority.
Meaning the Arabs aka Palestinians got 87% of Mandate Palestine.
(the Pink AND Red Areas)
77% of the British mandate was handed over to the Arabs, no Jews allowed:
You can also hunt for small injustices about the non-existence group of Palestinians (which, like I proved before - were not independent, and largely considered themselves Syrian)
This is all the lands the Arabs and Muslims inherited against the wishes of any minority or rivaling ethnicity, in comparison to Israel:
Look Akmed, you received 11,000,000 square miles of land. The Jews got
8,000.
So, can you give it a rest already? Millions of people were killed by the Arabs and Muslims between 1948-today in land-conflicts.
Can you not live with this loss? 8,000 square-kilometers man. 8,000!!!!
2/3 of what became Israel was State Land, passing from the Ottomans, to the British, to the Jews; owned by NO Arab.
This Includes the Half alone of Israel that was/Is the Negev Desert.
Yup:
Non-Aligned Movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You know how the UN works? It's based on a democratic process. The Arab/Muslim block which makes up the non-alignment movement has a majority in the UN - so they determine the agenda.
So, this is why country's like Israel have been subject to more UN resolutions than all 190+ members combined.
this is why the Palestinians are the chosen people in the UN, because they oppose Israel.
This is why we rarely, if ever, hear UN criticism of Muslim states.
For example, the UN was silent during the bangladesh liberation war, where Pakistan killed between 50,000-3,000,000 innocent in 1971, but the 1973 yom-kippur war, which killed ~15,000, dominated the UN.
This is why the Arab League sponsored genocide in Darfur continues unabated, and their supports sit on the UNHRC.
So yeah, the Muslims control the UN. Why shouldn't they? they're the majority. they have 2/3 of the world's oil supply.
it's only fair.
I do recognize Israel's right to exist and a right to their own homeland where they can live in peace and harmony, just not on stolen land.
Well then you obviously don't support Israel, or your own self-determination, because however you look at it a significant amount of Israel's current population lives on land recently occupied by Arabs.
Either way, every nation sits on stolen land. The partition of India, which resulted in Pakistan/India - displaced 10,000,000, and killed 1,000,000.
How much Hindu land does Pakistan live on? How much Muslim land does Hindu live on?
How much Jewish land do the Arabs sit on? How much Kurdish land do the Arabs and Turks sit on?
Oh I see...the standard only applies to Israel, not peaceloving innocent muslim cesspools like Pakistan.
Israel is yet to take responsibility for its actions resulting in the suffering of an entire people. They still say the Palestinians left voluntarily etc. WHEN you decide to tell the truth we will be a step closer to peace. Heck you still lie about 1967, and you want people to believe you?
ive provided explicit evidence supporting my arguments, repeating yourself is NOT persuasive.
this is why no one takes the muslim world seriously.
Bullshit answer? I am serious, if you have a case bring it to the court! Heck take it to the UN, and have sanctions on these countries, or should we instead bomb the hell out of others? maybe that's a more suitable choice for you?
It's a bullshit answer.
Arabs are responsible for the systematic cleansing of 99% of the muslim world's jewish population, and acquisition of a land 4x the size of Israel.
And yet, you do not question the Arab states right to exist, nor do you RESPOND TO MY POST about if Israel is justified in waging terror war against the Arabs states to acquire the stolen land.
Where do you want Palestinians to assimilate? in countries that aren't their own? and by what reason?
Absolutely.
the Arab states founded their independence the same time the Arabs were displaced in the 1948 war.
the Palestinians had no state in 1948. They had no country, no identity. Had the Arabs won the 1948 war, the Palestinians WOULD become citizens of Jordan, Egypt, and Syria.
This is why the Arab states did not create a Palestinian state between 1948-1967, even though no Jew lived in the WB, Gaza, or East Jerusalem.
the Palestinians have lived in the Arab world more than the Zionist one.
10% of Lebanons' population are Palestinian, yet they are not citizens. 40% of the Palestinian refugees are citizens of Jordan, yet most do not even live in Jordan.
Gaza has been Egyptian more than Palestinian, and yet Gazans are not Egyptian.
And finally, the Palestinians of Israel are citizens of Israel.
Like I said, the Arab states are responsible for the Palestinian displacement, they are responsible for their suffering, and they are responsible for using them to fight Israel so idiot muslims can ***** and moan about Israel and how horrible it is.
So people like yourself have a personal scapegoat.
You obviously have your own version of the UN resolutions. Incredible you can get that much out of a couple of paragraphs.
Israel fulfilled its obligations to UN242, the Arabs rejected it.
This is a fact.
Accept it.
Dude you have your own definition of occupation which is not accepted by the international community, you can play with the words as much as you want. It won't change a thing.
Wrong.
The original drafters of UN242 explicitly stated Israel's war was a war of self-defense.
They didn't say their presence in the WB, Gaza, or E Jelem as unlawful.
Which is why no one in the UN says Israel's occupation is illegal, it isn't - at least not according to bind-UN resolutions.
Some argue the settlements are illegal, but they sit on less than 4% of the WB.
Either way, international law has been weaponized the Arabs via the UN.
This is why the international courts dubiously said the west bank barrier was illegal, even though it was entirely legal according to international law (rules of self-defense, responsibilities of sovereign nations, legal precedents set by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Morroco, India, Russia, etc..).
The rest of your post is mostly gibberish.
funny statement.
