What's new

Lebonan🇱🇧-Israel🇮🇱 Warr

The recent developments in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah have led to claims that Hezbollah has effectively "won" the 2024 Lebanon-Israel war. Reports indicate that Hezbollah launched a massive barrage of rockets, striking various Israeli cities and military sites, contributing to significant casualties among Israeli forces.

Key Points:​

  • Rocket Barrage: Hezbollah reportedly fired 150 rockets in a coordinated attack targeting key locations, including Tel Aviv and military installations. This escalation has resulted in numerous injuries and heightened tensions in the region.
  • Israeli Military Response: In response to the attacks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing increasing pressure from military leaders for a ceasefire. Generals have cited troop fatigue and the need for a pause in operations due to the prolonged conflict and resource limitations.
  • Casualties and Military Strain: The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have acknowledged significant losses, with reports of up to 22 soldiers killed in specific operations against Hezbollah. This has raised concerns about the effectiveness of Israel's military strategy and its ability to sustain operations against a resilient adversary.
  • Ceasefire Negotiations: Amidst these developments, Netanyahu is reportedly considering a ceasefire with Hezbollah. This decision is influenced by internal pressures and the recognition that continuing military operations may not yield the desired outcomes. The IDF has faced challenges in achieving its stated objectives, including claims of destroying 80% of Hezbollah's weaponry.
  • Political Implications: Netanyahu's potential agreement to a ceasefire could have significant political ramifications, as it may be perceived as a concession or failure to decisively defeat Hezbollah. This situation places him in a precarious position domestically, where public sentiment may shift based on perceptions of military success or failure.

Conclusion​

The current conflict illustrates the complexities of warfare in the region, with Hezbollah demonstrating its capability to inflict damage on Israeli forces while also capitalizing on Israel's military fatigue. The push for a ceasefire reflects both strategic considerations and the realities of prolonged engagement, highlighting the challenges faced by Netanyahu’s government amid rising casualties and public scrutiny. As negotiations progress, the outcome will likely shape future dynamics between Israel and Hezbollah, as well as broader regional stability.

 
.
The recent developments in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah have led to claims that Hezbollah has effectively "won" the 2024 Lebanon-Israel war. Reports indicate that Hezbollah launched a massive barrage of rockets, striking various Israeli cities and military sites, contributing to significant casualties among Israeli forces.

Key Points:​

  • Rocket Barrage: Hezbollah reportedly fired 150 rockets in a coordinated attack targeting key locations, including Tel Aviv and military installations. This escalation has resulted in numerous injuries and heightened tensions in the region.
  • Israeli Military Response: In response to the attacks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing increasing pressure from military leaders for a ceasefire. Generals have cited troop fatigue and the need for a pause in operations due to the prolonged conflict and resource limitations.
  • Casualties and Military Strain: The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have acknowledged significant losses, with reports of up to 22 soldiers killed in specific operations against Hezbollah. This has raised concerns about the effectiveness of Israel's military strategy and its ability to sustain operations against a resilient adversary.
  • Ceasefire Negotiations: Amidst these developments, Netanyahu is reportedly considering a ceasefire with Hezbollah. This decision is influenced by internal pressures and the recognition that continuing military operations may not yield the desired outcomes. The IDF has faced challenges in achieving its stated objectives, including claims of destroying 80% of Hezbollah's weaponry.
  • Political Implications: Netanyahu's potential agreement to a ceasefire could have significant political ramifications, as it may be perceived as a concession or failure to decisively defeat Hezbollah. This situation places him in a precarious position domestically, where public sentiment may shift based on perceptions of military success or failure.

Conclusion​

The current conflict illustrates the complexities of warfare in the region, with Hezbollah demonstrating its capability to inflict damage on Israeli forces while also capitalizing on Israel's military fatigue. The push for a ceasefire reflects both strategic considerations and the realities of prolonged engagement, highlighting the challenges faced by Netanyahu’s government amid rising casualties and public scrutiny. As negotiations progress, the outcome will likely shape future dynamics between Israel and Hezbollah, as well as broader regional stability.



There are ongoing discussions about a potential ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, facilitated by U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein. Lebanese officials, including Hezbollah representatives, have reportedly expressed conditional agreement to the proposal, which aligns with United Nations Resolution 1701. This resolution mandates Hezbollah's disarmament in southern Lebanon, a long-standing point of contention.

While the Lebanese side appears optimistic, Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, are cautious. Israel demands the right for its military (IDF) to strike Hezbollah's military infrastructure if violations occur post-ceasefire. Negotiations continue, with significant gaps yet to be resolved, particularly regarding Hezbollah’s arms smuggling routes and military capabilities near the border

 
.
There are ongoing discussions about a potential ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, facilitated by U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein. Lebanese officials, including Hezbollah representatives, have reportedly expressed conditional agreement to the proposal, which aligns with United Nations Resolution 1701. This resolution mandates Hezbollah's disarmament in southern Lebanon, a long-standing point of contention.

While the Lebanese side appears optimistic, Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, are cautious. Israel demands the right for its military (IDF) to strike Hezbollah's military infrastructure if violations occur post-ceasefire. Negotiations continue, with significant gaps yet to be resolved, particularly regarding Hezbollah’s arms smuggling routes and military capabilities near the border


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuhas made an official statement regarding the ongoing ceasefire negotiations with Lebanon, particularly in relation to Hezbollah. He acknowledged that while the ceasefire agreement is not perfect, there are significant concerns about the potential for a unilateral resolution imposed by the United States in the UN Security Council to end the conflict.

Key Points from Netanyahu's Statement:​

  • Concerns Over Unilateral Actions: Netanyahu expressed apprehension that if sanctions were imposed on Israel for not halting military operations, it could lead to a mandatory ceasefire without a formal agreement. He emphasized that such an outcome would be detrimental to Israel's security interests.
  • Nature of the Ceasefire Agreement: The proposed ceasefire is expected to last for an initial 60 days, during which Israeli forces would withdraw from southern Lebanon. In return, Hezbollah would cease its operations south of the Litani River, with Lebanese Army forces taking over those areas.
  • Strategic Implications: Netanyahu's statement reflects a broader strategy to ensure that any ceasefire arrangement includes provisions for Israel's right to respond militarily in case of violations by Hezbollah. He highlighted the importance of maintaining operational flexibility in response to potential threats.
  • Political Dynamics: The discussions around the ceasefire have been influenced by various political factions within Israel, with some members of Netanyahu's coalition expressing opposition to any agreement that does not guarantee complete security for northern Israel.
  • International Involvement: The United States, alongside France and other nations, is playing a crucial role in mediating the ceasefire talks. The U.S. has been advocating for a resolution to end hostilities and has indicated that it would oversee compliance with any agreement reached.
This statement underscores the complexities surrounding the ceasefire negotiations, as Israel navigates both domestic political pressures and international diplomatic efforts while addressing ongoing security concerns related to Hezbollah's activities.

 
.
Hezbollah has released footage showing its use of suicide drones and missiles, specifically the Fadi-6 and Qader-2, targeting military sites in Tel Aviv. This development highlights the group's increasing reliance on advanced aerial weaponry in its conflict with Israel.

Key Details:
  • Drone and Missile Strikes: Hezbollah claimed responsibility for a coordinated attack involving a swarm of suicide drones and missiles aimed at military targets in Tel Aviv. The Fadi-6 drones and Qader-2 missiles were reportedly used in these strikes, showcasing Hezbollah's evolving arsenal.
  • Damage Reported: While the footage confirms that the attacks reached their targets, Israeli media reported that the damage was limited to specific areas. For instance, a missile strike near Ramat Gan caused injuries to five individuals and disrupted operations at Ben Gurion Airport briefly
  • Hezbollah’s Strategy: These attacks are part of Hezbollah's broader campaign, referred to as the "Khaybar Operations," aimed at retaliating against Israel's airstrikes on Lebanon. The group has increasingly deployed drones and precision missiles to target sensitive Israeli military installations
  • Israel’s Response: The Israeli military has intensified its airstrikes on Hezbollah strongholds in southern Lebanon, targeting infrastructure and supply routes. Despite this, Hezbollah's ability to launch such sophisticated attacks underscores ongoing challenges for Israel in countering these threats
This escalation reflects the growing sophistication of Hezbollah's military capabilities and raises concerns about the potential for further destabilization in the region. Both sides continue to engage in heavy exchanges amid ongoing ceasefire negotiations facilitated by international mediators.

 
.
Israeli airstrikes have resumed in Dahye, a southern suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. This latest bombing comes amid heightened tensions following a series of rocket attacks from Hezbollah into northern Israel.

Key Details:​

  • Casualties and Damage: Initial reports indicate that at least nine people have been killed and dozens injured due to the airstrikes. The Lebanese Ministry of Public Health has stated that several of the injured are in critical condition. The strikes targeted densely populated areas, including residential buildings, leading to significant destruction.
  • Context of the Strikes: The airstrikes occurred shortly after Hezbollah launched approximately 120 rockets into northern Israel. This reciprocal violence highlights the escalating nature of the conflict, which has intensified since the beginning of hostilities earlier this month.
  • Targeting Hezbollah Leadership: The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed that the strikes aimed to eliminate key Hezbollah figures, including Ibrahim Aqil, a senior commander linked to previous attacks against Israel. The IDF has stated that these operations are part of their broader strategy to degrade Hezbollah's military capabilities.
  • Previous Incidents: This is not the first instance of Israeli bombings in Dahye; it follows earlier strikes that have targeted Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon. The ongoing military actions reflect Israel's commitment to countering perceived threats from Hezbollah, which it accuses of using civilian infrastructure for military purposes.
  • International Implications: The renewed violence raises concerns about a potential regional escalation, as both sides continue to engage in heavy exchanges across the border. The situation remains fluid, with diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire appearing increasingly tenuous.
This escalation underscores the complexities of the conflict and its humanitarian impact on civilians living in affected areas. As both sides prepare for further confrontations, the international community is closely monitoring developments in hopes of finding a path toward de-escalation.


1732631662077.jpeg
 
.
Despite warnings from the Israeli military, thousands of locals have begun returning to southern Lebanon, specifically to towns like Tyre, Nabatieh, and Bint Jbeil. This trend comes after a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, which has prompted some displaced residents to defy Israeli orders to stay away from previously evacuated areas.

Key Developments:​

  • Return of Residents: Following the ceasefire, many families have started to return to their homes in southern Lebanon. Reports indicate that residents are moving back into areas that had been heavily impacted by Israeli airstrikes and military operations. Celebrations have been noted among those returning, with some expressing feelings of pride and relief.
  • Israeli Warnings: The Israeli military has issued strong warnings against returning to these areas, citing ongoing risks due to potential military operations and the presence of Israeli troops in parts of southern Lebanon. Israeli officials have advised residents that returning could jeopardize their safety.
  • Humanitarian Context: The return of residents occurs amid a backdrop of significant displacement caused by the conflict. Estimates suggest that tens of thousands of people had previously fled their homes due to the violence, with many seeking refuge in safer areas like Tyre and Sidon.
  • Local Sentiment: Many returning residents view their homecoming as a victory for Hezbollah, expressing pride in their community's resilience. This sentiment reflects a broader narrative within southern Lebanon about defiance against external threats.
  • Continued Tensions: While some residents are returning, the situation remains volatile. The ceasefire does not guarantee long-term peace, and the potential for renewed hostilities continues to loom over the region.

Implications:​

The return of locals to southern Lebanon highlights the complex interplay between military actions and civilian life in conflict zones. As residents navigate the risks associated with returning home, the situation underscores the ongoing humanitarian challenges faced by those living in proximity to active conflict areas. The international community remains watchful as developments unfold, hoping for sustained peace but preparing for possible escalations.

 
.
Despite warnings from the Israeli military, thousands of locals have begun returning to southern Lebanon, specifically to towns like Tyre, Nabatieh, and Bint Jbeil. This trend comes after a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, which has prompted some displaced residents to defy Israeli orders to stay away from previously evacuated areas.

Key Developments:​

  • Return of Residents: Following the ceasefire, many families have started to return to their homes in southern Lebanon. Reports indicate that residents are moving back into areas that had been heavily impacted by Israeli airstrikes and military operations. Celebrations have been noted among those returning, with some expressing feelings of pride and relief.
  • Israeli Warnings: The Israeli military has issued strong warnings against returning to these areas, citing ongoing risks due to potential military operations and the presence of Israeli troops in parts of southern Lebanon. Israeli officials have advised residents that returning could jeopardize their safety.
  • Humanitarian Context: The return of residents occurs amid a backdrop of significant displacement caused by the conflict. Estimates suggest that tens of thousands of people had previously fled their homes due to the violence, with many seeking refuge in safer areas like Tyre and Sidon.
  • Local Sentiment: Many returning residents view their homecoming as a victory for Hezbollah, expressing pride in their community's resilience. This sentiment reflects a broader narrative within southern Lebanon about defiance against external threats.
  • Continued Tensions: While some residents are returning, the situation remains volatile. The ceasefire does not guarantee long-term peace, and the potential for renewed hostilities continues to loom over the region.

Implications:​

The return of locals to southern Lebanon highlights the complex interplay between military actions and civilian life in conflict zones. As residents navigate the risks associated with returning home, the situation underscores the ongoing humanitarian challenges faced by those living in proximity to active conflict areas. The international community remains watchful as developments unfold, hoping for sustained peace but preparing for possible escalations.

 
.
Why does Hezbollah need some time?
1- After the pager and wireless communication devices incident, Hezbollah needs to find alternative, non-traditional means of communication. This is one of the reasons for the scarcity of direct battle footage from Hezbollah.
2- Hezbollah needs to organize its internal affairs following the loss of its frontline political and military leaders.
3- Lebanon is not Gaza, Gaza is predominantly of one sect, while Lebanon was carved out of the Levant with almost equal numbers of Sunnis, Shias, Christians, and a minority of Druze.

This diverse sectarian makeup has made it easier to exploit tensions, a tactic used by Israel and Arab regimes media funded by Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Their aim has been to weaken the popular support base for the resistance. Despite these challenges, Hezbollah has stood firm for over a year.
4- The Lebanese front was not composed solely of Hezbollah fighters but also included Palestinians and Lebanese Sunni (Islamic group)
5- It is a truce, not a permanent ceasefire. With Trump returning in two months, much may change.
6- Whether the Lebanese front is active or not, the core issue remains what is happening in Gaza.

1732716171797.jpeg
 
.
Israel has a policy of attacking civilians, so Lebanon as a state does not have to hold back. Eye for an eye, or it would be suicidal. I mean if Israel deliberately killed 1000 civilians then the other side can do the same. Jews believe in killing men, women, children, and their cattle as a means to assert supremacy and dominance, their book says it and they say it. Total savagery and barbarism, but this is what they call 'moral' to teach 'lessons'.
Israel is on dead bed. They can't always fight war with that whole region, they know that....
 
.
Israel is on dead bed. They can't always fight war with that whole region, they know that....
They are not fighting with the whole region. Arab states are useless, no real pressure from them. Several are actually helping Israel behind calls for ceasefire. Only Iran, its proxy militias in Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, and the Palestinian resistance are fighting.

But, Israel is losing public support in the West. Two-third of American Jews now sympathize with Palestinians and one-third of young American Jews sympathize with Hamas.
 
.
HEZBOLLAH FIGHTERS LEAVE HANDWRITTEN NOTES FOR HOMEOWNERS WHOSE HOMES THEY USED The Notes they Left:
1: “To the family of this house, we ask for your forgiveness, we used your house to eat and sleep in. Signed - the Men of God.”
2: “Our dear people, please forgive us for entering your home and taking 4 cigarettes that were there, as well as some washing detergent.
Also forgive us for staying inside your home for a while, but without touching or messing anything. We pray you will return safely to your home, once victory is achieved. Signed Islamic resistance mujahedeen - Hezbollah.”
3: “Forgive us we took some stuff from your home and slept in it. Signed Hezbollah.”
4: “Peace be upon you and victory from Allah and his blessings. Please forgive us for using your home, your water and kitchen utensils and needs.
To clear our debt we have placed a small amount to seek your forgiveness, in the hope you will return to your home with your heads held high.
Signed: The men of God.”

1732799237807-png.1034959
 

Attachments

  • 1732799237807.png
    1732799237807.png
    997.5 KB · Views: 51
.
Israel has reportedly broken a ceasefire agreement by launching airstrikes on the Tebna area, located between Al-Bissarieh and Tefahtain southern Lebanon. This military action follows a series of escalating hostilities in the region, which have seen significant casualties and destruction.

Key Details:​

  • Airstrikes on Tebna: The Israeli military targeted the Tebna area, continuing its pattern of strikes against locations in Lebanon amid ongoing tensions with Hezbollah and other militant groups. The specific objectives of these strikes have not been disclosed, but they are part of Israel's broader strategy to counter perceived threats from Hezbollah.
  • Recent Context: This attack comes after prior Israeli airstrikes that have resulted in numerous civilian casualties, including an attack on Ain Yaaqoub that killed at least 14 people. Since the escalation of violence in October 2023, Israeli strikes have claimed over 3,768 lives in Lebanon and displaced approximately 1.2 million people, significantly impacting civilian infrastructure.
  • Ceasefire Efforts: Despite ongoing diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire, including discussions facilitated by U.S. officials, the situation remains volatile. Reports indicate that while there were indications of progress towards a ceasefire, Israeli military actions continue unabated.
  • Hezbollah's Response: In retaliation to Israeli strikes, Hezbollah has been launching rockets into northern Israel. This cycle of violence has further complicated efforts to achieve a lasting ceasefire and has heightened fears of a broader conflict in the region.

Conclusion​

The recent Israeli airstrikes on the Tebna area signify a troubling escalation in the ongoing conflict with Hezbollah. As both sides continue to engage in military actions despite attempts at diplomacy, the humanitarian situation in Lebanon remains dire, with significant loss of life and displacement of civilians. The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, urging restraint and a return to negotiations for peace.

1732803356113.png
 
.
In the end 3523 Lebanese died and 129 Israelis. Admitted by both sides.

Material losses thus far unaccounted for.
 
.
The recent destruction of the village of Mhaibib in southern Lebanon by Israeli forces has sparked outrage and concern, particularly due to its historical significance as the site of the 2,100-year-old shrine of Prophet Benjamin, the son of Jacob. This operation, which involved extensive demolitions and detonations, has drawn international condemnation and raised questions about the implications for cultural heritage and civilian safety in conflict zones.

Overview of the Incident​

On October 16, 2024, Israeli forces executed a series of demolitions in Mhaibib, resulting in widespread destruction. Videos circulated on social media depicted massive explosions that reduced much of the village to rubble. Eyewitness accounts describe Israeli soldiers celebrating as they observed the demolitions from a distance, further intensifying the emotional impact of the event on local communities.Mhaibib is located in the Marjaayoun district, approximately 115 kilometers from Beirut, and is situated near the Blue Line, which demarcates the border between Israel and Lebanon. The village has historical and religious significance, attracting visitors to its ancient shrine. The destruction of such a culturally important site raises alarms about the preservation of historical heritage amid ongoing military conflicts.

Historical Significance of Mhaibib​

The village of Mhaibib holds deep cultural and religious significance for many Lebanese, particularly those who identify with its historical roots. The shrine dedicated to Prophet Benjamin is a site of pilgrimage and reverence, symbolizing centuries of history and faith. The loss of this site not only affects local residents but also represents a broader trend in which cultural heritage is threatened by modern warfare.

Israeli Military Justifications​

The Israeli military has justified its actions by claiming that it targeted Hezbollah tunnels allegedly located beneath Mhaibib. They assert that these tunnels pose a security threat and are used for military operations against Israel. However, critics argue that such justifications do not warrant the extensive destruction of civilian infrastructure and culturally significant sites.Israeli officials have stated that their operations aim to neutralize threats from Hezbollah, which they accuse of using civilian areas for military purposes. This tactic has been met with skepticism by humanitarian organizations and observers who highlight the disproportionate impact on civilians and cultural heritage sites.

Humanitarian Impact​

The demolition of Mhaibib has exacerbated an already dire humanitarian situation in southern Lebanon. Since the escalation of hostilities following Israel's offensive on Gaza in October 2023, over 1.2 million people have been displaced from their homes due to ongoing violence. The destruction of villages like Mhaibib contributes to a growing refugee crisis as families are forced to flee their homes in search of safety.Local officials, including Mhaibib’s mayor Qassem Jaber, have expressed deep concern over the extent of the damage and the inability of residents to return home. Many villagers had already evacuated due to prior warnings from Israeli forces about potential military actions in their area.

Reactions from Local and International Communities​

The destruction of Mhaibib has sparked outrage among Lebanese citizens and officials, with many condemning Israel's actions as an affront to cultural heritage and human rights. Activists have called for accountability regarding the targeting of civilian areas during military operations.Internationally, human rights organizations have raised alarms about potential war crimes associated with such actions. The targeting of historic sites, especially those with religious significance, is seen as a violation of international law governing armed conflict, which seeks to protect cultural property during wartime.

Broader Geopolitical Implications​

The demolition of Mhaibib reflects broader geopolitical tensions in the region, particularly between Israel and Hezbollah. Since the onset of renewed hostilities in late 2023, Israel has expanded its military operations beyond Gaza into southern Lebanon, aiming to dismantle Hezbollah's military capabilities.This escalation raises concerns about a potential wider conflict involving multiple regional actors. The dynamics between Israel, Lebanon, Iran (which supports Hezbollah), and other regional powers complicate efforts for diplomatic resolutions.

Conclusion​

The destruction of Mhaibib serves as a stark reminder of the human cost associated with armed conflict and highlights the urgent need for dialogue and de-escalation in the region. As communities grapple with loss and displacement, preserving cultural heritage becomes increasingly critical amid ongoing hostilities.The international community must respond to these developments by advocating for protections for civilians and cultural sites during conflicts. Ensuring accountability for actions that violate international humanitarian law is essential for fostering long-term peace and stability in Lebanon and beyond.As tensions continue to rise along the Israel-Lebanon border, it is imperative that all parties involved seek pathways toward reconciliation rather than further destruction—recognizing that every lost village carries with it not just physical structures but also stories, memories, and identities that are irreplaceable.

 
. .
Back
Top Bottom