Once more, that is an isolated laughter reaction and not user harassment nor spamming. The user in question did not complain about me spam-reacting to his posts, they took issue with a single reaction because they believed it was uncalled for. However and unbeknownst to them, the reason I reacted to that post was not in relation to the video it contained, but due to the text in the "Tweet" it cited, which was claiming that these short-lived riots would result in the downfall of the Islamic Republic. As proven by the way events finally unfolded, this was beyond ludicrous an assessment, which even opponents to the Islamic Republic in this thread never believed in.
What is more, the same user is on the record for advocating that Iranian border guards shoot to death Afghan children, women and elderly if they tried to cross into Iran. You failed to show indignation in this regard, but will instead enthusiastically reproduce that user's complaint about my reaction. The thing which bothers you most, is when people defend the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic, because it is the only major adversary to the zio-American empire's hegemony in the Muslim world.
At any rate, you're again refusing to distinguish between spam / harassment on the one hand and normal, authorized use of the laughter emoticon on the other. It's not exactly hard to understand though, a 5-year old would have done a better job by now. Therefore you're deliberately dismissing forum rules and playing naive in hopes of derailing the Iranian Chill Thread and are preventing us from having constructive exchanges.
Hence your off-topic drivel has been reported, as will any continuation of this derailing attempt from now on.
And I invite everyone to report user sammuel's off-topic posts if they keep it up.
@Mehdipersian @Sardar330 @mohsen @WudangMaster @Shawnee @zartosht @jauk @Muhammed45
I see ,
So you admit that you reacted to my posts with a laughing emoji , in order to spite, offend or to ridicule what i wrote,
You seem to be having delusions, for these were not my words at all. You may like attributing false statements to people, but this is not how a civil discussion is conducted.
The only difference , you say you did it less times , so it does not count as spam or harassments.
So according to you it is only about quantity , too much - will count as harassment,
I wonder , if you would also run crying so the moderators , if someone started marking all your posts with a " like " emoji,
After all , the " like " emoji , creates the same effect of " harassment " when it appears on you alert button. So why do you care if the reaction emoji is in blue or yellow ?
Here are a few more example of your use of the laughing emoji out of context , care to explain what is it exactly that you found humorous in this posts ?
After all you said that :
So I wonder, what is it that you " genuinely " found so funny , that you could not contain yourself and simply had to " compliment " the writer for his sense of humor ? :
Jannati, poor guy is a national-level joke. I wouldn't really call Khamenei the Ahriman. I don't believe that a single person could change a country for the better or worse. He was a bright cleric in his prime years. When you look at the people that were involved in the regime that came after...
defence.pk
US have a bunch of weapons they can send, but one way or another, they decided not to transfer any of this. The Official position for Biden is they want to leave room for negotiation and don't want to get the war hot, I mean if they pour these article in it and then turn around and as Russia...
defence.pk
Khuzestan province is the rich oil province and his high GDP is due to that, but obviously local people doesnt smell that money, the real richer zone of Iran is Tehran (the capital, like every country of this world). In that case, none of it would be counted towards the province's own per...
defence.pk
I don't have to explain every reaction I make. Each has a valid reason, and unlike the user who's been spam-reacting to my posts, I actually read what I react to.
That you do not particularly shine in acknowledging justified reactions, is evidenced by your failure to understand why I reacted to user QWECXZ's post which you shared a screenshot of.
This said, I will have to repeat once again: as per rules announced by this website's administration, spam-reaction with laughter emojis constitutes harassment and therefore violates forum rules, whilst other use of the function does not.
In other terms, you are having issues with forum rules. Stop bugging me with your dissatisfaction about the rules.
Why do you complain when others do the same as you ?
User Falcon29 has been spamming my posts with laughter emoticons. This represents harassment according to the forum administration. I am therefore perfectly entitled to report it.
Whereas I myself did not spam-react to another user's input whilst in the know of rules. Therefore I did not "do the same" at all.
Let me remind you of moderators' reaction when I reported user Falcon29's spam-reacting:
Nobody's preventing you from reporting any violation of rules you witness. However, as you perfectly know, you have nothing on me and are simply attempting to provoke using disingenuous verbal constructs, and hijacking the Iranian Chill Thread in the process.
