Al-Andalus
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
- Messages
- 456
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Don't be hypocrite
They are invaders so they don't have right on inch of iranian land if they want autonomy/independence they can have it on their original lands in the sands of Arabia
According to you if some people invade and settle in other people lands that land became theirs
So Indians can claim UAE because they are the majority even if they immigrated to emirate 50 years ago??
Or the jewish European have the right to establish state on any land they immigrated to even if there is natives live there??!!!
Similar to how Farsis are invaders from the Kazakh steppe/Central Asian deserts as some of them claim they are? Al-Ahwaz/Southwestern Iran was ruled by Semitic peoples and Elamites millennia before any notion of Iran even came to be. I BET that those Iranian Arabs are more native to that land than the Persians that live there since they have mixed with Elamites and their descendants among others. Something I doubt that the average Farsi from say Mashhad 1500 km away close to the borders of Turkmenistan has.
Hell, it's even an extension of the Arabian Plate/Mesopotamian lowlands. Local cuisine, eaten by all groups, is very similar to Arab cuisine as well. It was an independent sheikdom until the Brits thought otherwise.
Ever wondered why the real Persians of Southern Iran (Fars) look almost identical to neighboring Arabs but vastly different from Iranians from Northern Iran that are supposedly identical to them? Anyway Safavids settled numerous Caucasians (Armenians, Georgians) in Iran so they are likely descended from those people. No resemblance to Persian heartlands.
There are 500.000 million Persians in the GCC and as many of Iranian Arab/Persian/Lur descent mainly. You cannot tell them apart until they open their mouths. This is the reality that pseudo Persians of Northern Iran (Persianized people) should conform too as well as delusional, actual Persians.
Also Arab presence in Iran predates Islam by many, many centuries. In fact Persian rulers used to settle Arabs in Southern Iran BC from modern-day Southern Iraq and Eastern Arabia to help quell rebellions which were very common in Iran as it was a highly feudal society where peasants (98% of the population) lives evolved around serving their local noble/lord.
Why not in the sands of Iran?
Anyway I hope you are aware of the fact that most of the Iranian Arabs have the closest ties to Southern Iraq/Eastern Arabia so whenever you are insulting them you are insulting yourself and by extension the Persians themselves who are supposedly native to that region of the world too (Fars).
Lasly I do not deny Arab imperialism (it was unmatched until the Brits appeared) but it's not like Iranians don't have their own imperial past. All ethnicities of any importance had this. Those that had not, was not because they were better humans but simply because they did not have the abilities to act in such a way.
Last edited: