What's new

India has a long term plan to annex Bangladesh in a way or other in future.

. .
Still crying for Half Kashmir :lol:
That was never ours to begin with.Technically Kashmir belonged to Pakistan as far as the conditions of partition are concerned.We literally took their meal out of their mouth and they couldn't do anything about it:azn:.Otoh,we also annexed Hyderabad which by the above logic should have belonged to Pakistan,we did the same with Junagarh too and then with Goa;).This is called "Baniya power":D
 
Last edited:
. .
I read this in Quora. Vijay Simha's answer to Why didn't India annex Bangladesh? - Quora

Vijay Simha
61 Views
main-qimg-401440d0388bb27fbe3329dad51d507f

India does have plans to annex the orange marked regions of Bangladesh in the near future and is augmenting its armed forces and paramilitary forces in the Bengal, Assam and Tripura to do just this.

We are gathering strength in this region so that 1 million Indian troops will soon be positioned to attack along six points along the India-Bangladesh border.

India wants to annex the Rangpur region on the top left corner in order to expand the chicken's neck and facilitate accessibility to the Eastern states of India.

India wants to annex the Khulna region so that the whole of the Sundarbans lies within India.

India want to annex the Sylhet region so that illegal Bangladeshi migrants to Assam can be settled there and it wants to distribute the tea estates of Sylhet between the people of Assam and Meghalaya.

India wants to capture the entire Chittagong region so that the people of the Eastern states will now have a port to trade their goods to South East Asia and this will help the economy of the Eastern States of India.

Written Tue
And who is to vouch for the authenticity of the Author... who the hell is this guy.. even OP could have posted under fales name on quora.com.. and then he is using that as a source of information.
 
.
. . . .
That was never ours to begin with.Technically Kashmir belonged to Pakistan if the conditions of partitions are concerned.We literally took their meal out of their mouth and they couldn't do anything about it:azn:.Otoh,we also annexed Hyderabad which by the above logic should have belonged to Pakistan,we did the same with Junagarh too and then with Goa;).This is called "Baniya power":D

Lol just love the way you guys come up with excuses and justification to feel good. You just can't accept the simple fact that Pakistan snatched huge piece of land right from your hands. Same territory that dog-ra raja signed to you. It is actually fragile Pakistan who took something which at least on papers belonged to India. As for Hyderabad and Jungardh. There was no land connection with Pakistan. They both were in middle of Indian territory. So obviously logically Pakistan couldn't take them. If there was some kind of land connection with any of these territories, Pakistan would have taken most of them if not all. Same with Goa. Pakistan has no claim over it on any bases. Technically Kashmir belonged to you and not Pakistan since the dog-ra raja signed a few bogus annexation papers to India and not Pakistan. Those annexation papers might worth sh!t but still they are some papers. ;)


@BDforever

You must be enjoying Indian excuses too. :lol:
 
.
It will be quite opposite. Religion will lost its zeal 100 years later and Bengalis of West Bengal will no longer feel any sense of unity with Rest of India when there is a country called Bangladesh Exists.
 
.
Lol just love the way you guys come up with excuses and justification to feel good. You just can't accept the simple fact that Pakistan snatched huge piece of land right from your hands. Same territory that dog-ra raja signed to you. It is actually fragile Pakistan who took something which at least on papers belonged to India. As for Hyderabad and Jungardh. There was no land connection with Pakistan. They both were in middle of Indian territory. So obviously logically Pakistan couldn't take them. If there was some kind of land connection with any of these territories, Pakistan would have taken most of them if not all. Same with Goa. Pakistan has no claim over it on any bases. Technically Kashmir belonged to you and not Pakistan since the dog-ra raja signed a few bogus annexation papers to India and not Pakistan. Those annexation papers might worth sh!t but still they are some papers. ;)


@BDforever

You must be enjoying Indian excuses too. :lol:
Lol,you took some inhospitable mountains and ridges,the real Kashmir valley with all it's resources and rivers is still with us,along with Ladakh and the Jammu region:azn:.Accept it or not,kashmir will always remain a bone of contention for your country.You want it desperately but know in your heart that it won't be a reality in anytime soon:lol:!!
 
.
I read this in Quora. Vijay Simha's answer to Why didn't India annex Bangladesh? - Quora

Vijay Simha
61 Views
main-qimg-401440d0388bb27fbe3329dad51d507f

India does have plans to annex the orange marked regions of Bangladesh in the near future and is augmenting its armed forces and paramilitary forces in the Bengal, Assam and Tripura to do just this.

We are gathering strength in this region so that 1 million Indian troops will soon be positioned to attack along six points along the India-Bangladesh border.

India wants to annex the Rangpur region on the top left corner in order to expand the chicken's neck and facilitate accessibility to the Eastern states of India.

India wants to annex the Khulna region so that the whole of the Sundarbans lies within India.

India want to annex the Sylhet region so that illegal Bangladeshi migrants to Assam can be settled there and it wants to distribute the tea estates of Sylhet between the people of Assam and Meghalaya.

India wants to capture the entire Chittagong region so that the people of the Eastern states will now have a port to trade their goods to South East Asia and this will help the economy of the Eastern States of India.

Written Tue

Only Yesterday I was working on a plan to annex Fiji and Uruguay... such revaealing posts take away the element of surprise.

@BDforever : Moja lagaiche ? I'll gift a few islands of Fiji to you and Keep the Uruguayan Football team... Are you In on a Deal ?
P.S. Latin Babes are yours too...
 
Last edited:
. .
Lol,you took some inhospitable mountains and ridges,the real Kashmir valley with all it's resources and rivers is still with us,along with Ladakh and the Jammu region:azn:.Accept it or not,kashmir will always remain a bone of contention for your country.You want it desperately but know in your heart that it won't be a reality in anytime soon:lol:!!

Another excuse and justification. :rofl:

We took the most strategic and might be the most beautiful region of Kashmir state. We cut your land connection with Afghanistan and carved out a border for ourselves with our biggest ally China. If we wouldn't have taken that land there won't be any CPEC today. GB and AJK are far more beautiful than inhospitable mountains and ridges. :lol:

And the best part is that we are getting all the water that we need from those rivers. And yes Kashmir is bone of contention. A place where Indian soldiers would keep dying till the land would come its rightful owner. :)

@BDforever

Check the new justification. :D
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom