What's new

IF NOT KHALISTAN, SHOULDN'T EAST PUNJAB BE AUTONOMOUS REGION

Pakistan can try their best to separate Punjab from India but it never gonna happen. I live with Sikh peoples and nearly 95 percent people in Punjab want to live with India. Badal is the CM of Punjab is the main example of this. I think Pakistani member should care about Balochistan and other parts of Pakistan. Don't worry about India otherwise again something like 1971 happen. :devil:
 
.
So do you have some information regarding Pakistan Real Situation?
I don't need that Khalistanis are not doing bomb blast and other SH*T in India like Baloch Army is doing in Pakistan. They are worry about India. Sikhs who live in UK and Canada USA after 1984 are supporting Khalistan but that movement is not growing now...:coffee:
 
. . .
Also the real question that everyone has missed is if there is any support for East Punjab Autonomous Region ?

Punjab has 40% non Sikh Punjabis who never supported Khalistan or Autonomous Region
Only small fraction of remaining 60% are pro Khalistani

Could you explain the need for for granting Autonomous status?
Most Indian have view that none of the states should have that status including Kashmir
 
.
If most Sikhs do not see " KHALISTAN " a viable option , don't they support East Punjab to be an Autonomous Region like Kashmir. I have read that 95% Sikh favour creation of an Autonomous region instead of a separate Country.



US Sikhs split by loyalty to religion, to India - CSMonitor.com

US Sikhs split by loyalty to religion, to India

It was the envelope that troubled Bhagwant Kaur Sidhu. Inside was a letter she had written to relatives in India. But she didn't want to write ''India'' on the envelope. In her mind, the Indian government had done too much against her people and her religion.


The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

''It is a feeling of hurt,'' says Mrs. Sidhu, a Sikh who now lives in suburban Chicago. Reluctantly, she addressed her letter ''India.''

Sikhs around the world are increasingly concerned about events in India. Many are calling for greater Sikh autonomy, observers say.

Matters were not helped by the recent assassination of Indira Gandhi, India's prime minister, by two Sikh bodyguards. In India, thousands of Sikhs were attacked by angry mobs of Hindus seeking revenge. Many Sikhs abroad condemned the assassination but were shocked by this rioting. Suddenly the idea of ''Khalistan'' - the separate Sikh nation envisioned first by some extremists - is being talked about.

Not all Sikhs support the concept. ''I don't see Khalistan as a viable step, '' says Bruce La Brack, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of the Pacific. He says Sikh moderates will eventually see the importance of continued Sikh-Hindu ties. ''This is a family that's had a terrible fight, but it's still a family.''

But many Sikhs seem to be moving closer to the separatists' view.

''Like me, moderate Sikhs never supported 'Khalistan,''' says Pavitar Singh, a physician in Aurora, Ill. ''Now I have been pushed to the extreme.''

This is a dramatic shift for Sikhs outside of India, who until recently paid little attention to the separatists, observers say. The change was sparked in early June, when the Indian Army stormed the Golden Temple, the holiest Sikh shrine, to flush out armed Sikh militants whom it said were running a terrorist operation from the temple. In the process, hundreds of Sikhs were killed.

Suddenly in Sikh communities in the US, Canada, and Britain, the slain Sikh leader - Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale - became a martyr. (His color poster now hangs in the temple of the Sikh Religious Society here in Palatine, Ill.) And the separatist movement gained credibility here.

''They were not asking about a separate state before the Golden Temple attack ,'' says Mohindar Singh, a priest at the Sikh temple in Palatine.

Now, he says, 95 percent of the congregation supports some form of greater Sikh autonomy.

''After the sixth of June, this became the demand of all the Sikhs,'' says J.S. Bhullar, secretary-general of the newly formed World Sikh Organization, which is raising money to open offices in Sikh communities around the world, including Canada, Britain, Singapore, and the United States.

Hindus and Sikhs ''are like brothers and sisters,'' says Amarjit Singh Sidhu, a Sikh architect here, who attended college in India with Hindus. But ''it raises the question in your mind that maybe these guys don't want you anymore.''

These reactions - in Sikh communities outside of India - are extremely important, says Professor La Brack. In the past, successful Sikh immigrants have funneled huge amounts of money back to relatives in the country. The World Sikh Organization has raised approximately $2 million to peacefully promote Sikh separatism, Mr. Bhullar says. At the temple in Palatine, about $60,000 has been raised for the families of Sikh victims in India. Individual donations have been substantial. Dr. Singh of Aurora has enrolled some 25 members in a Sikh professional group he is forming. Annual dues: $2,000.

Whether this type of support will continue is another question, observers say.

''It's not a deep or strong support,'' says Mark Juergensmeyer, a professor of religious studies at the Graduate Theological Union and the University of California at Berkeley. Much depends on what the Indian government does. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, Mrs. Gandhi's son, has offered financial compensation to Sikh families hurt by the rioting.

Some Sikhs already echo the hope for a peaceful solution. ''I still feel there's time to correct it,'' says Amrik S. Chattha, president of the Sikh Council of North America. ''We have lived together for centuries. Why can't we do it today?''


Who the fu** cares what some US based Sikhs think? NOBODY!

khalistan is dead here.... the only thing which still exists are 5 old guys holding a free khalistan sign in Amritsar.

*
Indians want to close this thread, understand their worried.....:rofl:

......But they will come to cheer on Pakistan's every problem issues.

Why do we want to close it? Anyone in India or some basic knowledge about the matter knows that there are almost no khasistan supporters left in India.... and nobody gives a fu** about those losers in the UK and the USA.
 
. .
some Sikhs in canada still support khalistan, some sikh in UK too, not sure about USA.
In India, majority in punjabi dont support it, there is no need when they get fair say in India and vastly overrepresent themselves in many powerful places.
Only bit that upsets sikhs is 1984 riots which was never brought to conclusion and those who were masterminds are still not behind bars. I think that is a genuine grievence.

you should know many NRIs live in a time wrap, they long for the place which they left and time stops for them when they left India. Or if they hate the place that kind of remains forever.
I would argue to khalistanis, that they got sympathetic treatment (under MMS regime) compared to other separatists or jihadis. A kashmiri separatist was hanged recently but khalistani was not.
If they keep pushing the boundary, they might be for a nasty surprise, again.
 
. . .
That may be true or not depending on how we look at it, but knowing all the facts is in our interests, since it is right next door to us and anything that happens there will impact us as a Nation.
There is a huge portion of punjab in Pakistan....may be you big hearted Pakistanis should allow the sikhs settled in canada and the US to create a seperate country in that part of punjab....
 
.
NRI Sikh here, so I will give you an insight. Save for a few silly jatts (not my caste btw) absolutely none of us want to seperate from our mother India. What we do want is some more autonomy as our state is now full of bhaiyya and I don't appreciate that. We also want our Lahore back but that's another story all together.
 
. .
Why not stick to the topic and discredit it logically rather than trashing it. Just shows to prove that you have no logical explanation and take the easy way out..... :enjoy: :crazy: :P

Ok let's talk about 'logic'. They are not 'Indian' Sikhs. They are US citizens.

Going by your 'logic', Afghan Pashtuns demand for Pakistani Pashtun part to be theirs is valid too.

Seriously ridiculous, Prof!
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom