What's new

IAF's fighter plane Sukhoi 30 crashes in Nagaon in Assam

Guys guys guys! It has nothing to do with SU-30. It has to do with the expertise of IAF. Those guys aren't able to ride a motorbike without crashing it.
Russia and China fly hundreds of Su-30 planes, a lot more planes than India, how often do they crash? That's right, the problem is in the pilots.
 
.
Guys guys guys! It has nothing to do with SU-30. It has to do with the expertise of IAF. Those guys aren't able to ride a motorbike without crashing it.
Russia and China fly hundreds of Su-30 planes, a lot more planes than India, how often do they crash? That's right, the problem is in the pilots.
The indian will claim nonsense of IAF pilot is the best and clock more hours than USAF that justify their high crashed rate and their superior pilot skill and many more nonsense.

I remember a report on IAF jaguar crashed in india with conclusion of no reason. Stated as unknown crashed :lol:
 
. .
It's just the start, now that IAF has started to fly Sukhois due to "crashed" shortage of Mig 21's, they are proving that regardless of how modern, advanced, and reliable a plane, it's never safe from IAF pilots.



IAF pilots.



Probably because Sukhoi is looking more like a Mig 21 in crash performance.

Nop Su-30mki is one of the best fighter in Indian inventory and one if the top fighter in the world comparing Su-30mki with mig-21 is unjust to this beast.


Indian Su-30 MKI lost in crash
By: Atul Chandra
Bangalore
Source: Flightglobal.com
9 hours ago
An Indian air force Su-30 MKI twin-seat fighter, the mainstay of the nation’s combat fleet, crashed on 19 May, with both pilots ejecting safely.

A statement issued by the ministry of defence says the aircraft was on a “routine sortie” and crashed approximately “36km south of Tezpur in Assam.”

The fighter took off from Tezpur air base, located in India’s North-Eastern region at 1230 local time and crashed a short while later. The air force has ordered a Court of Inquiry.

It is not yet known if the air force will ground the entire Su-30 MKI fleet, as was done following the loss of another SU-30 MKI on 21 October 2014.

There appears to be some confusion about the cause of last October’s crash. At the time it was attribued to an uncommanded seat ejection. Unsourced reports have since emerged that the loss was actually the result of pilot error. The air force, however, insists that crash investigations had “not indicated human error or technical defect as the cause,” and it will not reopen investigations on “any of these accidents.”

Indian Su-30 MKI’s have also seen recurring problems with the NPO Saturn AL-31FP thrust-vectored engines.

In March, defence minister Manohar Parrikar told parliament that from January 2013 to December 2014, “a total of 35 incidents of either engine failure in air or engine related problems have occurred.” “As advised by the OEM, the precautions / predictive maintenance during exploitation of aero engines have been implemented by the Indian air force.”
 
. .
Guys guys guys! It has nothing to do with SU-30. It has to do with the expertise of IAF. Those guys aren't able to ride a motorbike without crashing it.
Russia and China fly hundreds of Su-30 planes, a lot more planes than India, how often do they crash? That's right, the problem is in the pilots.

The problem is in the manufacturing agency HAL.

The pilots rarely crash aircraft directly procured from foreign sources (Mirage 2000)
 
.
Let's wait and see what the BoI says, it is too early to assign blame. And anyway risk is an omnipresent reality in aviation, forget combat aviation, you can never truly eliminate risk. One has to accept the IAF is a very very large and growing force that pushes its men and machines to the limit in terms of capabilities and operational tempo and so crashes are always going to occur.

Do you know what is the Ratio of the hours flown to Crash rate is for the IAF ?
 
.
maintenance problem

India need to build its domestic engine.
No, they need to build a huge plant that can support AL-31 engine but it will need extensive metallurgy and knowledge to achieve amatonous of maintenance which India do not have.
 
.
how often do they crash? That's right, the problem is in the pilots.
the rate of PLA is Much large when it compared to IAF

justify their high crashed rate and their superior pilot skill and many more nonsense.
Go through PLA Crash Rate you will get An idea

How do you asses PAF that they have wrecked less planes than IAF. Stop throwing around rhetorical questions.

Can you list those 5-6 F-22 crashes ? Don't post a freaking Wikipedia entry...just research it a bit and come back,educate us all about the 5/6 F22 crashe
Another Day, Another $678 Million Stealth Jet Wrecked | WIRED
Dead F-22 Pilot's Family Vindicated by Stunning Crash Report - ABC News
 
. . .
. .
Stop copy & pasting Google Search results.I bet you still don't know what's wrong with your numbers.

If you really want your way out of this embarrassing situation you can always hide behind the F16 numbers and console your heart. :lol:
whats there to console, its Machine it will be crashed reasons can be many The U.S. Navy lost a staggering 13,000 aircraft and 9,000 air crew in the four decades after World War II, mostly due to accidents, not enemy fire, as its pilots adjusted to the lethal combination of jet engines and aircraft carriers.

Your Blaming of IAF training with Crash is irrelevant Point. Maintenance and Serviceability of the aircraft is Not a Duty of Pilot but ground Aircrew And Firms which deals with it.

That's too much to ask of a country that can't make ANYTHING on its own。
yeah Country which Still Flying there Fighters with help Foreign Engines and Surives on Reverse-engineering Preaching Us About Indigenous
 
.
whats there to console, its Machine it will be crashed reasons can be many The U.S. Navy lost a staggering 13,000 aircraft and 9,000 air crew in the four decades after World War II, mostly due to accidents, not enemy fire, as its pilots adjusted to the lethal combination of jet engines and aircraft carriers.

Your Blaming of IAF training with Crash is irrelevant Point. Maintenance and Serviceability of the aircraft is Not a Duty of Pilot but ground Aircrew And Firms which deals with it.


yeah Country which Still Flying there Fighters with help Foreign Engines and Surives on Reverse-engineering Preaching Us About Indigenous
WS10G turbojet with 14 tons thrust had completed its test, had sarted to mass produce. J10c will install WS10G means probably sold to PAF. our aviation industry enters into new threshhold.

can IAF stand two fronts war with China and Pakistan? i think it can't. Modi prefer better relationship with China for certain reasons.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom