Human rights violations in held Kashmir not internal Indian matter: OIC

[Gregor Clegane]

kamaal hye OIC, TURKEY and now Ban-ki UN General condemn killing of Kashmiris by Indian forces in IOK but all are barking ? and Afghanistan and Bangladesh support India stance which is .................

kamaal ke logic hey... see the weight of both sides... Turkey, UN, Saudia (Pakistan) on the other side Afganistan and Bangaldesh (India) see the weight and stance of independent and puppet regimes

Rofl.UN never said it condemned India all it said was that it was concerned with violencein the region and that Allsides need to maje peace.
Next time read properly.
Also Turkey repeated the exact same lip service it has been saying since 1964.

Just 20 years???

India has been saying that Kashmir is its integral part for past 70 yeas and Pakistan don't even give a rat as$ to it even once.

Pakistan has been saying Kashmir is it's jugular vein for 70 years.
India never even gave a mice's a$$

You do understand that incumbent secretary general is toeing Pakistani line on Kashmir? The key statements are, kashmir is NOT India internal matter, and only referendum is way forward.
Nobody is claiming in Pakistan that this sudden change in OIC stance which has taken many even in Pakistan by surprise, is out of love of Pakistan or kashmiries. Pakistan importance has grown many fold for GCC in particular and middleseast in general with the current mess there. They need to toe Pakistan line for their own sake. It's changing geopolitics at play here.

So yeah ignore this 57 countries grouping at your own peril. That's 57 votes in UN. More importantly it's the perception and narrative which now building around India.

Sudden change.
OIC has been issuing same statements since 1994.

 

[ghameed]

Just 20 years???

India has been saying that Kashmir is its integral part for past 70 yeas and Pakistan don't even give a rat as$ to it even once.

Yes ..i can see Pakistan is crying everytime over Jammu and Kashmir .....some people just don't learn ..keep crying like a little child until the end of eternity

 

[Areesh]

Yes ..i can see Pakistan is crying everytime over Jammu and Kashmir .....some people just don't learn ..keep crying like a little child until the end of eternity

You guys don't know to differentiate between crying and political and moral support. May be because crying is a favorite pass time in India.

Pakistan has been saying Kashmir is it's jugular vein for 70 years.
India never even gave a mice's a$$

But Pakistan has 38% of jugular vein despite being smaller and weaker as compared to its aggressive neighbor. You even manged to lose some of your "integral part" to China in 62 war. How pathetic is that!!!

 

[Gregor Clegane]

But Pakistan has 38% of jugular vein despite being smaller and weaker as compared to its aggressive neighbor. You even manged to lose some of your "integral part" to China in 62 war. How pathetic is that!!!

And we managed to take 46% of your jugular vein despite being in a poorer economic condition in 1947-48.
Also you guys surrendered 5180 sq km of your land China because you ert your pants.

 

[Areesh]

And we managed to take 46% of your jugular vein despite being in a poorer economic condition in 1947-48.
Also you guys surrendered 5180 sq km of your land China because you ert your pants.

You manged to take only 46% despite all numerical superiority.

As for our agreement with China. We didn't lose even an inch of land but in fact got more land in return from China. Something you can't do ever. Go read more about that agreement before making a fool out of yourself.

 

[Gregor Clegane]

You manged to take only 46% despite all numerical superiority.

As for our agreement with China. We didn't lose even an inch of land but in fact got more land in return from China. Something you can't do ever. Go read more about that agreement before making a fool out of yourself.

Lol.Despite invading Kashmir when not a single Indian soldier was present in the region, your army and those weak illiterate tribals managed to get only 38%

 

[Areesh]

Lol.Despite invading Kashmir when not a single Indian soldier was present in the region, your army and those weak illiterate tribals managed to get only 38%

Not even a single Pakistani soldier was in Kashmir either. It was all work by locals of Jammu and GB who liberated the area. Stop reading the sh!t that they teach you in schools and read something neutral to learn something about history of your so called atoot ang.

 

[American Pakistani]

Not even a single Pakistani soldier was in Kashmir either. It was all work by locals of Jammu and GB who liberated the area. Stop reading the sh!t that they teach you in schools and read something neutral to learn something about history of your so called atoot ang.

India tv has damaged their brain cells permanently.

 

[Gregor Clegane]

Not even a single Pakistani soldier was in Kashmir either. It was all work by locals of Jammu and GB who liberated the area. Stop reading the sh!t that they teach you in schools and read something neutral to learn something about history of your so called atoot ang.

Locals and no pakistanis were present .

To force the issue, sections in Pakistan's army and political leadership encouraged an invasion of the Kashmir valley by thousands of Pathan tribesmen.
They crossed the border in the early hours of 22nd October and - aided by desertions from the maharaja's army - quickly took control of the town of Muzaffarabad.
Khan Shah Afridi, a veteran of the invading force, said he was instructed to go to Kashmir by a Muslim holy man.
"The pir told us we will fight and we should not be afraid. It's a war between Muslims and infidels, and we will get Kashmir freed."
Many Kashmiri Muslims initially viewed the tribesmen as liberators, but the raiders' appetite for loot cost them much local support.
As the tribal army advanced towards Srinagar, the maharaja and his entourage fled by road, south to the city of Jammu.
"Everybody was furious," recalls Leela Pasricha, then in Srinagar; people said the maharaja was "running away, that he was abandoning everybody, that he was a coward. Saving his own skin, that's what we all thought."
Quest for booty
To save his capital city, the maharaja signed the document which made his princely state legally part of India.
At next-to-no notice, the Indian armed forces began the airlift of troops to Kashmir. It was the first big military test of independent India. Before their arrival the invading tribesmen, accompanied by a handful of Pakistani army officers,had captured Baramullah, the second city of the Kashmir valley.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7057694.stm

 

[Kaniska]

What an excuse you have there.. its similar to saying "Hah, you are using same old dagger to bleed India to death, what a shame the dagger you're killing India with is not even new".

or

You are using same old hands to slap India.. what a shame.. you are slapping India with same old hands.

Slapping India by OIC...Are you kidding me...?? All the major stakeholders of OIC do regular trade with India.
After West, NRI from Arab countries sent high remittance to India...If those things are not impacted, do you think in a low price oil market, OIC will venture out to do any thing substantial on the ground to break trade relation with India...
Otherwise, i am less worried about OIC says in some regular meeting.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Sudden change.
OIC has been issuing same statements since 1994.

Incorrect. They have been very direct this time telling India that Kashmir is not its internal matter. Ofcourse you are entitled to rubbish them. We in Pakistan care less. It's all about creating a certain environment and perception around India.

 

[graphican]

Slapping India by OIC...Are you kidding me...?? All the major stakeholders of OIC do regular trade with India.
After West, NRI from Arab countries sent high remittance to India...If those things are not impacted, do you think in a low price oil market, OIC will venture out to do any thing substantial on the ground to break trade relation with India...
Otherwise, i am less worried about OIC says in some regular meeting.

India was doing trade with OIC when their statement on the liberation of Kashmir came out. So your "expected influence" already had no influence on them.

Also all Kashmirs need is an international recognition of their legitimate right to determine their future and this international support is a step forward to make this happen.

 

[CHD]

There was no statement said by OIC chief, this OIC group don't give a sh!t about Kashmir issue. This is news propaganda spread by some Pakistani diplomat that OIC chief told him "Kashmir HR violatioin is International issue". There is no need to worry, OIC is a little group with no power, it will take a lot of courage for them to issue such statement officially.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1151059408288012

 

[Kaniska]

India was doing trade with OIC when their statement on the liberation of Kashmir came out. So your "expected influence" already had no influence on them.

Also all Kashmirs need is an international recognition of their legitimate right to determine their future and this international support is a step forward to make this happen.

See you did not get my point...We do not need to influence OIC..The point is OIC or any one outside power can not influence our policy about what we do inside out country...The reason is simple, OIC itself is a paperless tiger with respect to human right violation withing their own countries as well as entire middle east is in war zone since last 50 year? What has your OIC done to influence anything in last decade...

So my point is that we see our relationship with other nation in terms of how much we are impacted with trade relation..We do not care..how much emotionally they love us or we do not have any ummah time affinity with any nation as long as our interests are nor addressed.

 

[Areesh]

Locals and no pakistanis were present .


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7057694.stm

Your link says:

They crossed the border in the early hours of 22nd October and - aided by desertions from the maharaja's army - quickly took control of the town of Muzaffarabad.

Now read about Jammu revolt by locals which happened 2 months before October 1947 when there were no tribals and Pakistan army officers.

First, the Poonch uprising that started on 18 August 1947 against the Maharaja’s rule.

You are not told about Poonch rebellion in schools because:

‘Nehru didn’t want to publicise the Poonch rebellion because it would have strengthened Pakistan’s case’

http://www.tehelka.com/2013/02/nehr...se-it-would-have-strengthened-pakistans-case/

Now you can roll on the floor all you want.

PS: You can always take help from me about Poonch rebellion since obviously your state didn't teach you about it in schools.