Super Falcon
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
- Messages
- 15,816
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Hq is not better than S 300 pakistan should have bought directly S 350 vityaz rather than these
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are better than S 300 and HQ 16 B is equal to S 350Hq is not better than S 300 pakistan should have bought directly S 350 vityaz rather than these
A good day for Pakistan air defence keeps away the dirty flies from the Indian side.
"Pakistan previously showed interest in Russia’s S-300 SAM system, but analyst and former Australian defense attache to Islamabad Brian Cloughley says Russo-Indian defense relations may prevent such a sale.
“As the Indians are getting the S-400, I doubt that Russia would provide Pakistan with any SAM system,
Rather, Pakistan might reconsider another former interest — China’s HQ-9. Though certainly more affordable, it’s debatable whether any HQ-9 variant available to Pakistan is as capable as the latest version of the S-300.
However, citing the “close nature of the defense relationship between Pakistan and China,” aerospace expert Douglas Barrie, with the International Institute for Strategic Studies, believes sourcing a Chinese system “has considerable attraction, not least of all in potentially being able to plug into any future developments China might have.”
But an HQ-9 acquisition may demand organizational changes.
Tufail noted that although the Pakistan Air Force is “responsible for the overall command and control of air defense and operates all early warning airborne [systems] and radars” as well as airfield defenses, the Army operates SAM systems that defend “countrywide vulnerable areas/points as well as over the battlefield.” However, long-range SAM systems would need to be under Air Force control, Tufail added, as the service has “a far greater visibility of the air defense ground environment and can not only manage such a system better, but can prevent fratricide in a [beyond-visual-range] shooting scenario."
While the acquisition of a long-range SAM system remains possible"
I think LY 80s are under PAmajor air defence systems are linked under PAF command
I think LY 80s are under PA
What good is any tech when the Docile Duo will order NOT to engage for fear of escalation
Bro all in good time and we will choose our time wisely and our own choosing. So be patient and make yourself strong enough first to be able to take on the enemy.
if u dont mind please share source of these 3 batteries or a hint . Thanks .i heard that PAF got 3 batteries of HQ-9, but only one delivered so far ?
Why PAF will operate HQ9?i heard that PAF got 3 batteries of HQ-9, but only one delivered so far ?
if u dont mind please share source of these 3 batteries or a hint . Thanks .
HQ-9B is more expensive than Russia's S-400. So, Pakistan should consider S-400 or others.Why PAF will operate HQ9?