What's new

Gujarat Riots 2002

YeBeWarned

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
17,194
Reaction score
12
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
.
The problem is a Hindu heart; so full of hate; of Muslims of any non-Hindu will not see this as a normal person would. They made the person solely responsible for this crime as their PM and that was his only qualification. But as you see now this hate is destroying them from inside, the hate doesn't stop but it grow and branches out in different parts of your life as evident from Today's Hindu-stan.
 
.
Came across this long detailed Documentary , I wonder if it was posted before ..but man that was horrible, hearing to those testimonies from the people who suffer is just heart wrecking, specially what happened with women .

There is more.
  1. The Chief Minister, whose lordly inactivity allowed the bigots loose for three days, showed not a morsel of remorse;
  2. The police - the bulk of them; there were honourable exceptions - blandly said that they did what they could, and the Army didn't turn up in time;
  3. Lt. Gen. Zameer Shah testifies that the Army was there on the second day, and was left high and dry by the state government failing to provide transport from the airport (the Indian Army doesn't have much of a presence in that state);
  4. The courts took up the matter, and punished some of the ring-leaders, while others were exonerated due to the vast number of witnesses who mysteriously 'turned hostile';
  5. The Supreme Court stepped in and appointed a Special Investigation Team, under R. K. Raghavan, whom I personally respect very much. However, his team contained Gujarat police officers including the infamous Geeta Johri, herself one of the accused. Anyone who is surprised that the team found that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the former Chief Minister may apply for the job of answering letters addressed by children the world over to Santa Claus.
  6. Police officers who testified in the media were transferred, suspended and then proceeded against on various trumped up charges;
  7. Other police officers who broke ranks on other serious offences were similarly punished.
Modi did nothing criminal; he did something that amounts to betrayal of his oath of office to uphold the Constitution. But that allowed criminals full freedom to brutalise men, women and children.
 
Last edited:
.

What i noticed , his speeches during and After the Riots were very careful but thought provocative, its like indirectly inciting hate within a mob to charge them . What happen with those 60+ Hindu's in Ayudya was horrendous but as the guy who lost his wife said, Revenge would not bring my Wife back .. and he didn't support the attacks on Muslim Areas . People can stoop to that level where they rape a pregnant women, take her fetus out and put it on spear :( man ISIS must have taken some lessons from them ..
 
.
Only humanity dies in riots .... Gujratis are more or less peaceful people irrespective of religion but the riots of 2002 proved by the End Of Day humans are also animals .....
What i noticed , his speeches during and After the Riots were very careful but thought provocative, its like indirectly inciting hate within a mob to charge them . What happen with those 60+ Hindu's in Ayudya was horrendous but as the guy who lost his wife said, Revenge would not bring my Wife back .. and he didn't support the attacks on Muslim Areas . People can stoop to that level where they rape a pregnant women, take her fetus out and put it on spear :( man ISIS must have taken some lessons from them ..
 
.
Only humanity dies in riots .... Gujratis are more or less peaceful people irrespective of religion but the riots of 2002 proved by the End Of Day humans are also animals .....

Govt played a crucial role in Riots .. Modi did nothing for few days, and that is what cause the bloodshed
 
. .
Govt played a crucial role in Riots .. Modi did nothing for few days, and that is what cause the bloodshed

Modi wanted to destroy Muslim population in Gujarat. He had earned the nickname “Butcher of Gajarat” for how he handled the massacre. Now, he is the PM of India. The high caste Hindus want a leader that will destroy Muslims, Christians and lower castes in India. Modi is their man.
 
.
Modi wanted to destroy Muslim population in Gujarat. He had earned the nickname “Butcher of Gajarat” for how he handled the massacre. Now, he is the PM of India. The high caste Hindus want a leader that will destroy Muslims, Christians and lower castes in India. Modi is their man.

And he is living up to their expectations ..
 
.
Loss of life is sad... What is the trigger to this roit?

There is more.
  1. The Chief Minister, whose lordly inactivity allowed the bigots loose for three days, showed not a morsel of remorse;
  2. The police - the bulk of them; there were honourable exceptions - blandly said that they did what they could, and the Army didn't turn up in time;
  3. Lt. Gen. Zameer Shah testifies that the Army was there on the second day, and was left high and dry by the state government failing to provide transport from the airport (the Indian Army doesn't have much of a presence in that state);
  4. The courts took up the matter, and punished some of the ring-leaders, while others were exonerated due to the vast number of witnesses who mysteriously 'turned hostile';
  5. The Supreme Court stepped in and appointed a Special Investigation Team, under R. K. Raghavan, whom I personally respect very much. However, his team contained Gujarat police officers including the infamous Geeta Johri, herself one of the accused. Anyone who is surprised that the team found that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the former Chief Minister may apply for the job of answering letters addressed by children the world over to Santa Claus.
  6. Police officers who testified in the media were transferred, suspended and then proceeded against on various trumped up charges;
  7. Other police officers who broke ranks on other serious offences were similarly punished.
Modi did nothing criminal; he did something that amounts to betrayal of his oath of office to uphold the Constitution. But that allowed criminals full freedom to brutalise men, women and children.
Agreed, when law fails to take action, someone will take law into their hands.
 
.
Modi wanted to destroy Muslim population in Gujarat. He had earned the nickname “Butcher of Gajarat” for how he handled the massacre. Now, he is the PM of India. The high caste Hindus want a leader that will destroy Muslims, Christians and lower castes in India. Modi is their man.
The fear of growing muslim population has always been a problem for hindu supremacists.

What i noticed , his speeches during and After the Riots were very careful but thought provocative, its like indirectly inciting hate within a mob to charge them . What happen with those 60+ Hindu's in Ayudya was horrendous but as the guy who lost his wife said, Revenge would not bring my Wife back .. and he didn't support the attacks on Muslim Areas . People can stoop to that level where they rape a pregnant women, take her fetus out and put it on spear :( man ISIS must have taken some lessons from them ..
marathis are famous for this and have been doing it for years.
 
.
http://bostonreview.net/martha-nussbaum-women-mutilated-gujarat

Body of the Nation
Why women were mutilated in Gujarat
MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM

I. What Happened
On February 27, 2002, the Sabarmati express train arrived in the station of Godhra, in the western Indian state of Gujarat, packed with Hindu pilgrims who were returning from Ayodhya. Ayodhya, as the alleged birthplace of the god Rama, has been a focal point of Hindu anti-Muslim feeling for several decades. In 1992, Hindu zealots destroyed the 16th-century Babri mosque there, claiming that it covered the remains of a Hindu temple. The pilgrimage, like many others in recent times, aimed at forcibly constructing a temple over the disputed site, and the mood of the returning passengers, stymied by the government and the courts, was angry. When the train stopped at the station, passengers got into arguments with Muslim vendors and passengers. At least one Muslim vendor was beaten up when he refused to say “Jai Sri Ram” (“Hail Ram”), and a young Muslim girl narrowly escaped forcible abduction. As the train left the station, stones were thrown at it, apparently by Muslims.

Fifteen minutes later, one car of the train erupted in flames. Fifty-eight men, women, and children died in the fire. Most of the dead were Hindus. Attempts to determine what really happened by reconstructing the event have shown only that a large amount of a flammable substance must have been thrown from inside the train. Because the area adjacent to the tracks was an area of Muslim dwellings, and because a Muslim mob had gathered in the vicinity to protest the incident on the train platform, blame was immediately put on Muslims. (Later, a number of public figures argued that the blaze was set by Hindu nationalists attempting to provoke a rampage.)

In the days that followed, wave upon wave of violence swept through the state. The attackers were Hindus, many of them highly politicized, shouting Hindu-right slogans, such as “Hail Ram” (a religious invocation wrenched from its original devotional and peaceful meaning) and “Hail Hanuman” (a monkey god traditionally celebrated for loyalty, but portrayed by the Hindu right as highly aggressive), along with “Kill!,” “Destroy!,” “Slaughter!” There is copious evidence that the violence was planned before the precipitating event. The victims were almost all Muslims, with an occasional Christian or Parsi thrown in. There was no connection between the identity of the victims and the identity of alleged perpetrators: attacks took place, for the most part, far from the original site. In fact, many families of the original dead implored the mobs to stop. Nonetheless, more than 2,000 Muslims were killed in a few days, many by being burned alive in or near their homes. No one was spared: young children were burned along with their families.

Particularly striking were the mass rapes and mutilations of women. The typical tactic was first to rape or gang-rape the woman, then to torture her, and then to set her on fire and kill her. Although the fact that most of the dead were incinerated makes a precise sex count of the bodies impossible, one mass grave that was discovered contained more than half female bodies. Many victims of rape and torture are also among the survivors who have testified. The historian Tanika Sarkar, who played a leading role in investigating the events and interviewing witnesses, has argued in an important article that the evident preoccupation with destroying women’s sexual organs reveals “a dark sexual obsession about allegedly ultra-virile Muslim male bodies and overfertile Muslim female ones, that inspire and sustain the figures of paranoia and revenge.”1 This sexual obsession is evident in the hate literature circulated during the carnage, of which the following “poem” is a typical example:

Narendra Modi [Chief Minister of Gujarat] you have fucked the mother of [Muslims]
The volcano which was inactive for years has erupted
It has burnt the arse of [Muslims] and made them dance nude
We have untied the penises which were tied till now
Without castor oil in the arse we have made them cry. . .
Wake up Hindus, there are still [Muslims] alive around you
Learn from Panvad village where their mother was fucked
She was fucked standing while she kept shouting
She enjoyed the uncircumcised penis
With a Hindu government the Hindus have the power to annihilate [Muslims]
Kick them in the arse to drive them out of not only villages and cities but also the country.
[The word rendered “Muslims” (“miyas”) is a word meaning “mister” that is standardly used to refer to Muslims.]
 
.
There is more.
  1. The Chief Minister, whose lordly inactivity allowed the bigots loose for three days, showed not a morsel of remorse;
  2. The police - the bulk of them; there were honourable exceptions - blandly said that they did what they could, and the Army didn't turn up in time;
  3. Lt. Gen. Zameer Shah testifies that the Army was there on the second day, and was left high and dry by the state government failing to provide transport from the airport (the Indian Army doesn't have much of a presence in that state);
  4. The courts took up the matter, and punished some of the ring-leaders, while others were exonerated due to the vast number of witnesses who mysteriously 'turned hostile';
  5. The Supreme Court stepped in and appointed a Special Investigation Team, under R. K. Raghavan, whom I personally respect very much. However, his team contained Gujarat police officers including the infamous Geeta Johri, herself one of the accused. Anyone who is surprised that the team found that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the former Chief Minister may apply for the job of answering letters addressed by children the world over to Santa Claus.
  6. Police officers who testified in the media were transferred, suspended and then proceeded against on various trumped up charges;
  7. Other police officers who broke ranks on other serious offences were similarly punished.
Modi did nothing criminal; he did something that amounts to betrayal of his oath of office to uphold the Constitution. But that allowed criminals full freedom to brutalise men, women and children.

And you convieniently forgot the following things.
* Massacre of 56 Hindu pilgrims which included women and children. (Yes Hindus didn't start the riots). People started to spread propaganda regarding that too saying the fire was lit from within and the karsevaks burnt themselves up with there family, Lalu Prasad Yadav formed his own committee which gave such outlandish reports and the Supreme Court just threw that in the dustbin.
* Supreme Court led SIT giving clean cheat to Modi. (Just because the SIT had officers from Gujrat police, doesn't change the fact that it was Supreme Court monitored led by a very competent officer)
* Only case of communal riots in India where mass scale convictions were made, some Minister's are on death row now. (Sikh riot victims are still waiting for justice, while Rajiv Gandhi was conferred with Bharat Ratna)
* Apart from the 56 innocent lives lost in Godhra, 200 Hindus were also killed during the riots for various reasons, including police firing.
* Within 30 mins after the first incident of rioting, Gujrat Govt asked for help (police personnel) from MP and Rajasthan, both Congress ruled state and both refused.
* And it's laughable when you state that the army doesn't have much of a presence in Gujrat, a state which borders Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
.
The problem is a Hindu heart; so full of hate; of Muslims of any non-Hindu will not see this as a normal person would. They made the person solely responsible for this crime as their PM and that was his only qualification. But as you see now this hate is destroying them from inside, the hate doesn't stop but it grow and branches out in different parts of your life as evident from Today's Hindu-stan.

It started with Large hearted Muslims burning 62 pilgrims. May be it is normal in Muslim country but not in India so people reacted. Now Both the communities shave better understanding and they are living peacefully. Gujarat Muslims are more prosperous than Muslims anywhere in Subcontinent.

Modi wanted to destroy Muslim population in Gujarat. He had earned the nickname “Butcher of Gajarat” for how he handled the massacre. Now, he is the PM of India. The high caste Hindus want a leader that will destroy Muslims, Christians and lower castes in India. Modi is their man.

He would have taken a crash course from Xi in Xinxiang. Had he done that, he would have succeed like Xi.

There is more.
  1. The Chief Minister, whose lordly inactivity allowed the bigots loose for three days, showed not a morsel of remorse;
  2. The police - the bulk of them; there were honourable exceptions - blandly said that they did what they could, and the Army didn't turn up in time;
  3. Lt. Gen. Zameer Shah testifies that the Army was there on the second day, and was left high and dry by the state government failing to provide transport from the airport (the Indian Army doesn't have much of a presence in that state);
  4. The courts took up the matter, and punished some of the ring-leaders, while others were exonerated due to the vast number of witnesses who mysteriously 'turned hostile';
  5. The Supreme Court stepped in and appointed a Special Investigation Team, under R. K. Raghavan, whom I personally respect very much. However, his team contained Gujarat police officers including the infamous Geeta Johri, herself one of the accused. Anyone who is surprised that the team found that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the former Chief Minister may apply for the job of answering letters addressed by children the world over to Santa Claus.
  6. Police officers who testified in the media were transferred, suspended and then proceeded against on various trumped up charges;
  7. Other police officers who broke ranks on other serious offences were similarly punished.
Modi did nothing criminal; he did something that amounts to betrayal of his oath of office to uphold the Constitution. But that allowed criminals full freedom to brutalise men, women and children.

Bunch of lies.

Fifteen minutes later, one car of the train erupted in flames. Fifty-eight men, women, and children died in the fire. Most of the dead were Hindus.

No mention of Who set it to fire. Not most of but all were Hindus. A typical fifth columnist covering Mullahs.
 
.
It was regrettable but in the 17 years since then Gujarat has been peaceful under Modi as cm and pm.it would be great if both godhra and Gujarat riot perpetrators are brought to justice.
There is a group of people who thoughtlessly blame Modi and call him names. They are only making the case more difficult for justice to be delivered because no substatiTive proof is shown. If Modi is found guilty the appropriate punishment to be meted out as with anyone else in any other such case .

The fear of growing muslim population has always been a problem for hindu supremacists.


marathis are famous for this and have been doing it for years.
They learnt this from the Muslim invasions.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom