So a car half way through the production line is a white elephant because its not being used by anyone?
A Satellite is not a car. It is VERY expensive equipment, with a very expensive launch vehicle and a very limited LIFE.
It's life expectancy is only 9 years. So the clock is ticking.
The receiver should have been ready and operational the moment IRNSS became operational. THAT is how its done. The design should already have been ready, tested and ready for demonstration.
Of course they are lies. You have already proven your idiocy many times.
You have built things being used in INS Arihant and now ISRO....yet you call IRNSS a white elephant when its not even completed.
Maybe they are. Maybe the thing being used in Arihant is also linked to ISRO.
This was your exact quote:
a) "We" making it and selling receivers (as though thats the main purpose of IRNSS)
b) "Satellite would have expired as though India is so technologically illiterate it cannot develop a simple L/S-band antenna receiver, mutiplexer and associated hardware. Idiot like you probably wants an article on daily bhaskar or something so you can then quote it and show pictures without checking if the basics even make sense....and then deflect by saying something you "designed" is being used there and therefore you are some authority.
LOL...what are you trying to prove here ?
That it is my contention that job of the IRNSS is to build and sell receivers ?
I build RF equipments and integrate RF into systems for a living. I have forgotten more about satellite communication that you can possibly know. I know for a certainty that IRNSS receiver has not yet be built or tested.by any of its users.
Do you even know how long it take to design, build, test, demonstrate, qualify, certify and then integrate a device into an operational matrix ?? You are a kid with google who thinks he knows something because he read some brochures.
But here and now my claim is not based on personal knowledge. SHOW me any IRNSS receiver in existence TODAY. Show me any article that talks of its existent. If you CANT then learn to shut up and Listen. Maybe you can learn something that way.
I mean when ISRO has already released the Interface control document for 3rd party set manufacturers (which you can look up yourself) and have done significant algorithm analysis:
http://www.insidegnss.com/auto/IGM_janfeb11-IRNSS.pdf
and we have people as far away as Finland picking up the signals
Tracking IRNSS Satellites | Inside GNSS
and 3rd party signal analysis already been done:
The System: IRNSS Signal Close up : GPS World
you still want Indian military to release direct information regarding their RS architectural design or some brochure?
That's like saying INS Arihant was a big white elephant before the first pictures were released.
Anybody an build a receiver based on the specifications you fool. The Reality is NOBODY is doing that.
That is the difference between a Theoretical solution and a PRACTICAL solution .
Even ISRO has done a signal analysis. That is not the same as an commercial receiver being built. There is no "algorithm analysis"
There is signal strength, and receiver sensitivity there is signal polarization and noise interference and then there is accuracy.
A Lab equipment and signal processor is not even close to a real life practical receiver that is ready to be integrated into any system.
An interface document is the bare minimum release. What does that prove ? Absolutely Nothing
Only that an interface exist.
