Falcon29
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 31,647
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lmao.....since when does Lebanon have a government or military for that matter.? the country is a failed state ruled defacto by a shia militia group whose allegiance is to a foriegn power. Hezbollah has long undermined the Lebanese government and military. They are just there for official sake and play second fiddle to that militias. Lebanon is the biggest joke in the region actually . Real example of a failed state
The Republicans, the "Cowboys", are interested in sectors such as petroleum, agribusiness, high-technology research and development, and defense contracting. The Cowboy members of the political-economic elite share a common cultural heritage that is largely derived from the frontier heritage of the West and that sharply distinguishes them from their Yankee associates. Unlike the Yankees, the Cowboys perceive the Pacific Basin as the focus for their essential interests and tend to be far more doctrinairely anti-Communist.
Hence, the Republicans hawkish stance towards China but softer approach to Ukraine (talking about their voters, not their leaders as aid to Ukraine is agreed to on by both sides).
Arabs reacting to the Indians
So much crying as usual
This time it will not work for hamas
@Get Ya Wig Split is this you? You don't look so good.
we will see tomorrow if aid is coming into Gaza. All other depends on that.Why is every one staying quite about Sisi's complicity in this genocide of the Palestinians?
Bhai,There is no fantasy in this post but a collection of facts that are often overlooked in narrative overflows. Is it difficult for you to understand the sequence of events in the Vietnam War and the fact that some of the most impressive American battlefield victories are in Vietnam? It was up to American leadership to take advantage of these American battlefield victories and secure independence of South Vietnam when Vietcong was brought to the negotiation table in 1972, but it did not. Both Johnson and Nixon turned out to be poor leaders, and Nixon went down in history as a corrupt leader. You stick to narrative but I have critical thinking, and I reflected on this historical development to understand what happened in fair manner.
You want to boast about Vietcong's prowess in combat? Study Sino-Vietnam War for a change. In this war, Vietcong maintained its occupational grip on Cambodia while holding China at bay. China wanted to liberate Cambodia by bringing Vietcong to its knees but suffered heavy losses in just 3 weeks and gave up. Vietcong handled two countries in this war and maintained its gains in the process. This is incredible.
-----
US does not have direct access to Afghanistan and had to work with Pakistan to do its bidding in Afghanistan. American mission was to dismantle Al-Qaeda Network in the region. Towards this end, Taliban setup was toppled in 2001 (Operation Enduring Freedom), and Al-Qaeda Network was defeated in Tora Bora mountains in 2002 (Operation Anaconda). Taliban and Al-Qaeda Network survivors fled to neighboring countries.
Taliban managed to regroup in neighboring countries but lost about 70,000 fighters in various clashes in Afghanistan and the war was settled on the negotiation table with Pakistani and Qatari mediation. Taliban had no choice but to accept following American demand:
"The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan reaffirms its continued commitment not to cooperate with or permit international terrorist groups or individuals to recruit, train, raise funds (including through the production or distribution of narcotics), transit Afghanistan or misuse its internationally recognized travel documents, or conduct other support activities in Afghanistan, and will not host them."
Do you think this demand was new? NO, it wasn't. This demand was put in front of Taliban in 2001. Read Pervez Musharraf's book.
Taliban accomplishments are impressive but they did not defeat US in war. They settled for peace with US while the US focused on dismantling Al-Qaeda Network in the region. US respected Pakistani interests but you are mistaking this for defeat. US and Pakistan were fully aware of what was going on and were in touch with each other. But you have let some naive boasters in this forum to cloud your judgement.
There are members here who believe Russians have won in Ukraine even though this war is yet to conclude. I do not see you "correcting" these members. You are the one who needs reality check, not me. The least you can do is to have a look at what I have disclosed, but nope. Don't quote me and waste my time with illogical rants if this is what you want to stick to.
@RescueRanger
@Signalian
@PanzerKiel
@FuturePAFwe will see tomorrow if aid is coming into Gaza. All other depends on that.
Let's be honest here, Palestinian are always depends on the kindness of international support, you can think their clause is just but any kind of struggle between them and Israel is going to largely depends on how much international support they can get.But for Palestinians the starting point is not something that Hamas did then Israel reacted starting Point was 75 years ago when Israel ethnically cleansed 700,000 Palestinians. 20 years ago there was no Hamas and still Israel was brutalizing Palestinians. Netaniyahoo is on video saying he will fund Hamas so Palestine stays divided and cannot unify behind a homeland demand. Hypocrisy is choosing the take October 7 as starting point and then justifying war crimes of Israel as retaliation. For Palestinian people Hamas was retaliating for Israeli past genocide.