What's new

Daesh was nurtured by Iran, says former Syrian vice president

We will not let bro.
We are in action to destroy ISIS. Kick NATO out of your country for sake of Turkish safety. Believe me after ISIS , USA will protect Al-Nusra to insecure Turkey.
You will have our support. Be brave again like the one you did to American coup. I was proud of Turkish people's reaction about that coup. You saved your country once then do it again by expelling NATO.
Bro, these people have no souls and complete racist like this @flamer84 guy, they're born to hate others. HE IS A CLEAR ZIONIST TOO.
The world will be a better place without these kind.
 
Bro, these people have no souls and complete racist like this @flamer84 guy, they're born to hate others. HE IS A CLEAR ZIONIST TOO.
The world will be a better place without these kind.
He looks to be Hungarian. Ask him about their refugees came in my country during WW2. Be brave. They can do nothing wrong
 
He looks to be Hungarian. Ask him about their refugees came in my country during WW2. Be brave. They can do nothing wrong
No bro, these people use false flags. that is how they operate. he will deny it. i bet. :lol:
 
No bro, these people use false flags. that is how they operate. he will deny it. i bet. :lol:
He cannot.
This image belongs to Polish refugees in Iran :
q3hDwvh_LytAJeNpP3gjIDolYHU0IuB93fN2g7ufDSY.jpg

Unfortunately i don't have Hungarian one. I will find it tomorrow.
 
- Sayyed Qutb theoretically inspired Jihadists, therefore ISIS; However, the same man inspired Mullahs(the regime in Iran) and their proxies, Islamic revolutionary guard corps and Hezbollah.

- IRGC and Hezbollah were established on the idea of Dynamic Islam, which is put forward by Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, this guy wrote 2 books, “The Islamic Dynamism” (Al Harikiyya Al Islamiyya), and “Islam and the Logic of Power” (Al Islam Wa Mantiq Al Quwwa), these 2 books are simply copy of Sayyed Qutb. But with a difference they were re-written by Shiite understanding.

- With the book of Sayyed Qutb, Jihadists were born; however, The same book re-written for Shiite understanding let Hezbollah, IRGC, Kassam Suleimani, Hasan Abbasi like groups and people.

- Jihadits and Shiites with proxies are the sons of the same father from different mothers, and similarly they bring chaos, death, shame and most importantly hate for Islam.
 
Last edited:
Bro, these people have no souls and complete racist like this @flamer84 guy, they're born to hate others. HE IS A CLEAR ZIONIST TOO.
The world will be a better place without these kind.


What are you two on about,dragging me into this thread ? Yes,European refugees were in the ME during WW2,where they worked in camps (including the women),and immediately left after the war was over.
 
Who the hell on earth can believe a Shia country like Iran support wahhabi thugs like Daesh in Syria in it's ally country! Daesh is created by the US in Jordan and Turkey and is getting supported by Turkey for many years.

Reading these sources shows Turkey is supporting Daesh for 5 years:

http://www.businessinsider.com/links-between-turkey-and-isis-are-now-undeniable-2015-7

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...entary-outlines-turkeys-support-islamic-state

http://warisacrime.org/content/turkey-supports-isis

http://observer.com/2016/02/deal-with-the-devil-turkey-props-up-isis-by-buying-its-stolen-oil/

http://www.politico.eu/article/german-govt-turkey-supports-terror-groups-in-middle-east/

http://www.mintpressnews.com/secret...irms-turkey-helping-isis-sell-its-oil/212228/

http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/02/14/turkey-is-the-source-not-solution-to-isis-and-the-syrian-crisis/

http://newobserveronline.com/leaked-report-links-turkey-isis/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/0...ws-that-saudi-arabia-and-turkey-support-isis/

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/more-proof-of-turkish-support-for-isis/amp/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ers-key-Syria-border-town-of-Kobane-live.html

http://www.shiapac.org/2014/11/22/german-deputy-speaker-nato-must-stop-turkey-support-for-isis/

http://observer.com/2016/02/deal-with-the-devil-turkey-props-up-isis-by-buying-its-stolen-oil/amp/

http://middleeastpress.com/english/confessions-of-an-isis-commander-on-receiving-turkeys-support/

Hundreds of more sources are available on internet.
 
- Sayyed Qutb theoretically inspired Jihadists, therefore ISIS; However, the same man inspired Mullahs and their proxies, Islamic revolutionary guard corps and Hezbollah.

- IRGC and Hezbollah were established on the idea of Dynamic Islam, which is put forward by Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, this guy wrote 2 books, “The Islamic Dynamism” (Al Harikiyya Al Islamiyya), and “Islam and the Logic of Power” (Al Islam Wa Mantiq Al Quwwa), these 2 books are simply copy of Sayyed Qutb. But with a difference they were re-written by Shiite understanding.

- With the book of Sayyed Qutb, Jihadists were born; however, The same book re-written for Shiite understanding let Hezbollah, IRGC, Kassam Suleimani, Hasan Abbasi like groups and people.

- Jihadits and Shiites with proxies are the sons of the same father from different mothers, and similarly they bring chaos, death, shame and most importantly hate for Islam.

If you wanna dig down a little bit more the idea of Islamic state and Jihad dates back to the prophet of Islam era once he established his government in Medina ... so technically nor Iran or Sayyed Qutb was founder of it neither following such a notion is against Islam .... Many versus in Quran talking about Jihad ... by the way:

First thing first you need to fathom is the notion and roots of Salafi movement in Islam and in the region:

The Salafi movement or Salafist movement or Salafism is an ultra-conservative reform movement within Sunni Islam that developed in Egypt in the second half of the 19th century, against a background of European colonialism. It advocated a return to the traditions of the "devout ancestors" (the salaf). Some scholars define this movement as Modernist Salafism.
For example Rashīd Rida an Islamic scholar who formulated an intellectual response to the pressures of the modern Western world on traditional Islam.:

"...He was concerned with what he considered the backwardness of the Muslim countries, a circumstance he believed resulted from a neglect of the true principles of Islam. He believed that these principles could be found in the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad and in the practices of the first generation of Muslims, before corruptions began to spread among the religious practices of the faithful (c. 655). He was convinced that Islam, as a body of teachings correctly understood, contained all the principles necessary for happiness in this world and the hereafter, and that positive effort to improve the material basis of the community was of the essence of Islam.

To realize a political and cultural revival, Rashīd Riḍā saw the need to unify the Muslim community. He advocated the establishment of a true caliph, who would be the supreme interpreter of Islam and whose prestige would enable him to guide Muslim governments in the directions demanded by an Islam adapted to the needs of modern society. His ideas were foundational to the establishment in 1928 of the religious and political organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood..."

Therefore the idea of political Islam or in other words Islamic state in our age has been a matter of debate amongst Islamic scholars for centuries at least since 18th century it's been profoundly influenced in Egypt by the writings of Muhammad Abduh , Jamal al dīn al afghani (asad abadi) , Rashīd Rida and later on Sayyed Qutb and also Hassan Banna to name a few ...

Moreover such an idea doesn't just origin amongst aforementioned scholars in Egypt but also you can find its traces in Indian subcontinent inspired by Shah Waliullah Dehlawi and also Deobandi (a revivalist movement within Sunni ,primarily Hanafi, Islam) . resulted in Ulama (body of religious scholars) in Pakistan led by Fazlur Rahman , Maulana Sami ul Haq (Father of the Taliban) and his Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam , besides Lashkar-e-Taiba , Jaish-e-Mohammed and Sipah-e-Sahaba ....


The next place after India and Egypt is Saudi Arabia :

6ae03e7a8b7d95ee6e465c68ceacbebc_XL.jpg

Sayyid muhammad Qutb died in Saudi Arabia in 2014.
Sayyid muhammad Qutb was arrested a few days before Sayyid (on July 29, 1965) for his alleged co-leadership along with his brother in a plot to kill leading political and cultural figures in Egypt and overthrow the government. His brother died on the gallows in 1966, but Muhammad's life was spared and he, along with other members of the Muslim Brotherhood took refuge in Saudi Arabia.

Actually the story begins here , a false interpretation of Sayyid Qutb by his brother in Saudi Arabia ignited what we see now ... Sayyid Qutb divided and categorized governments into 2 groups first Islamic society and secondly ignorant society and believed governor should be a divine one and any government that doesn't enjoy such a privilege is considered as an ignorant society .. t o solve the problem he suggested two solutions first immigration and secondly Jihad ... his whole point was against corrupted governors not Islamic sects and he didn't takfir any one expect governors ....
Bin Ladan was one of the muhammad Qutb followers and students and if you look what he did in Afghanistan in 80s you'll noticed at first they didn't target people and other sects like what we see right now ....
What happened was this a takifiri interpretation of Sayyid Qutb notion of Jihad against corrupted governors ... you can see it how Boko Haram kidnapped girls students because we didn't have western school in early Islam ... groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria , Al shabab in Somalia and ansar alsonnat in Algeria are all the same ,,,


In fact Afghanistan accelerated this when Indian/Pakistani branch of Salafism met its counterpart Egyptien/Saudis false interpretation resulted in creation of ALQ ...

And the idea of Islamic government/state in Iran led to Islamic revolution back in 1979 had nothing to do with Seyyed Qotb to eventually end up in creation of IRGC and Hezbollah in Iran ... actually and as a matter of fact a few books of him were translated before revolution and Iranian elites were mostly influenced by western philosophers rather than Arab or Muslim ones ... the demands of correction of government in Iran dated back to 19th century resulted in historical events like constitutional revolution in 1905, oil nationalisation movement of Iran in 1953 and finally Islamic revolution hence not related to Qutb.
 
Last edited:
If you wanna dig down a little bit more the idea of Islamic state and Jihad dates back to the prophet of Islam era once he established his government in Medina ... so technically nor Iran or Sayyed Qutb was founder of it neither following such a notion is against Islam .... Many versus in Quran talking about Jihad ... by the way:

First thing first you need to fathom is the notion and roots of Salafi movement in Islam and in the region:

The Salafi movement or Salafist movement or Salafism is an ultra-conservative reform movement within Sunni Islam that developed in Egypt in the second half of the 19th century, against a background of European colonialism. It advocated a return to the traditions of the "devout ancestors" (the salaf). Some scholars define this movement as Modernist Salafism.
For example Rashīd Rida an Islamic scholar who formulated an intellectual response to the pressures of the modern Western world on traditional Islam.:

"...He was concerned with what he considered the backwardness of the Muslim countries, a circumstance he believed resulted from a neglect of the true principles of Islam. He believed that these principles could be found in the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad and in the practices of the first generation of Muslims, before corruptions began to spread among the religious practices of the faithful (c. 655). He was convinced that Islam, as a body of teachings correctly understood, contained all the principles necessary for happiness in this world and the hereafter, and that positive effort to improve the material basis of the community was of the essence of Islam.

To realize a political and cultural revival, Rashīd Riḍā saw the need to unify the Muslim community. He advocated the establishment of a true caliph, who would be the supreme interpreter of Islam and whose prestige would enable him to guide Muslim governments in the directions demanded by an Islam adapted to the needs of modern society. His ideas were foundational to the establishment in 1928 of the religious and political organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood..."

Therefore the idea of political Islam or in other words Islamic state in our age has been a matter of debate amongst Islamic scholars for centuries at least since 18th century it's been profoundly influenced in Egypt by the writings of Muhammad Abduh , Jamal al dīn al afghani (asad abadi) , Rashīd Rida and later on Sayyed Qutb and also Hassan Banna to name a few ...

Moreover such an idea doesn't just origin amongst aforementioned scholars in Egypt but also you can find its traces in Indian subcontinent inspired by Shah Waliullah Dehlawi and also Deobandi (a revivalist movement within Sunni ,primarily Hanafi, Islam) . resulted in Ulama (body of religious scholars) in Pakistan led by Fazlur Rahman , Maulana Sami ul Haq (Father of the Taliban) and his Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam , besides Lashkar-e-Taiba , Jaish-e-Mohammed and Sipah-e-Sahaba ....


The next place after India and Egypt is Saudi Arabia :

View attachment 341795
Sayyid muhammad Qutb died in Saudi Arabia in 2014.
Sayyid muhammad Qutb was arrested a few days before Sayyid (on July 29, 1965) for his alleged co-leadership along with his brother in a plot to kill leading political and cultural figures in Egypt and overthrow the government. His brother died on the gallows in 1966, but Muhammad's life was spared and he, along with other members of the Muslim Brotherhood took refuge in Saudi Arabia.

Actually the story begins here , a false interpretation of Sayyid Qutb by his brother in Saudi Arabia ignited what we see now ... Sayyid Qutb divided and categorized governments into 2 groups first Islamic society and secondly ignorant society and believed governor should be a divine one and any government that doesn't enjoy such a privilege is considered as an ignorant society .. t o solve the problem he suggested two solutions first immigration and secondly Jihad ... his whole point was against corrupted governors not Islamic sects and he didn't takfir any one expect governors ....
Bin Ladan was one of the muhammad Qutb followers and students and if you look what he did in Afghanistan in 80s you'll noticed at first they didn't target people and other sects like what we see right now ....
What happened was this a takifiri interpretation of Sayyid Qutb notion of Jihad against corrupted governors ... you can see it how Boko Haram kidnapped girls students because we didn't have western school in early Islam ... groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria , Al shabab in Somalia and ansar alsonnat in Algeria are all the same ,,,


In fact Afghanistan accelerated this when Indian/Pakistani branch of Salafism met its counterpart Egyptien/Saudis false interpretation resulted in creation of ALQ ...

And the idea of Islamic government/state in Iran led to Islamic revolution back in 1979 had nothing to do with Seyyed Qotb to eventually end up in creation of IRGC and Hezbollah in Iran ... actually and as a matter of fact a few books of him were translated before revolution and Iranian elites were mostly influenced by western philosophers rather than Arab or Muslim ones ... the demands of correction of government in Iran dated back to 19th century resulted in historical events like constitutional revolution in 1905, oil nationalisation movement of Iran in 1953 and finally Islamic revolution hence not related to Qutb.


The history lesson is ok as long as it is credible and tells the whole story for today's situation.

All Jihadists and Mullahs/Shiites claim they do what ever they do is for Islam, As your background info claims. My objections raise right here at this point.


The relation between Iran and ISIS, and their idea/methods on the name of Islam, which causes chaos, death, shame and hate for Islam, unlike their claim.

What you did is

-to partly write about the background,
-and an attempt to keep equall actions of prophet Hz.Muhammed with actions of Jihadists/Shiites, and this attempt i have to say is the most disgutsting thing done due to your desperation to justify the regime in Iran,


However, you missed two articles, and have said nothing about their ideology and methods, therefore their alliance in the region(sons of the same father, remember?). here is:

- IRGC and Hezbollah were established on the idea of Dynamic Islam, which is put forward by Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, this guy wrote 2 books, “The Islamic Dynamism” (Al Harikiyya Al Islamiyya), and “Islam and the Logic of Power” (Al Islam Wa Mantiq Al Quwwa), these 2 books are simply copy of Sayyed Qutb. But with a difference they were re-written by Shiite understanding.

- With the book of Sayyed Qutb, Jihadists were born; however, The same book re-written for Shiite understanding let Hezbollah, IRGC, Kassam Suleimani, Hasan Abbasi like groups and people.

Those two articles are what needs to be clarified by you. You have given no background info or any thing else to enlighten what matters to today's situation( Iran-ISIS alliance).

the topic is Iran-ISIS relation, i would like to remind you.

P.s: I don't think we are talking about the same Sayyed Qutb, therefore His influence over mullahs/shiites are clear.
 
Last edited:
The history lesson is ok as long as it is credible and tells the whole story for today's situation.

All Jihadists and Mullahs/Shiites claim they do what ever they do is for Islam, As your background info claims. My objections raise right here at this point.


The relation between Iran and ISIS, and their idea/methods on the name of Islam, which causes chaos, death, shame and hate for Islam, unlike their claim.

What you did is

-to partly write about the background,
-and an attempt to keep equall actions of prophet Hz.Muhammed with actions of Jihadists/Shiites, and this attempt i have to say is the most disgutsting thing done due to your desperation to justify the regime in Iran,


However, you missed two articles, and have said nothing about their ideology and methods, therefore their alliance in the region(sons of the same father, remember?). here is:

- IRGC and Hezbollah were established on the idea of Dynamic Islam, which is put forward by Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, this guy wrote 2 books, “The Islamic Dynamism” (Al Harikiyya Al Islamiyya), and “Islam and the Logic of Power” (Al Islam Wa Mantiq Al Quwwa), these 2 books are simply copy of Sayyed Qutb. But with a difference they were re-written by Shiite understanding.

- With the book of Sayyed Qutb, Jihadists were born; however, The same book re-written for Shiite understanding let Hezbollah, IRGC, Kassam Suleimani, Hasan Abbasi like groups and people.

Those two articles are what needs to be clarified by you. You have given no background info or any thing else to enlighten what matters to today's situation( Iran-ISIS alliance).

the topic is Iran-ISIS relation, i would like to remind you.

P.s: I don't think we are talking about the same Sayyed Qutb, therefore His influence over mullahs/shiites are clear.
You are a barking dog. ISIS has nothing to do with Iran or Shiites.
 
Iranian posters here, want to blame a real Muslim nation like Turkey , while they continue to kill Sunni Muslims is disgusting!!
Syria will stay Muslim, once Assad the devil is gone!
 
The history lesson is ok as long as it is credible and tells the whole story for today's situation.

All Jihadists and Mullahs/Shiites claim they do what ever they do is for Islam, As your background info claims. My objections raise right here at this point.


The relation between Iran and ISIS, and their idea/methods on the name of Islam, which causes chaos, death, shame and hate for Islam, unlike their claim.

What you did is

-to partly write about the background,
-and an attempt to keep equall actions of prophet Hz.Muhammed with actions of Jihadists/Shiites, and this attempt i have to say is the most disgutsting thing done due to your desperation to justify the regime in Iran,


However, you missed two articles, and have said nothing about their ideology and methods, therefore their alliance in the region(sons of the same father, remember?). here is:

- IRGC and Hezbollah were established on the idea of Dynamic Islam, which is put forward by Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, this guy wrote 2 books, “The Islamic Dynamism” (Al Harikiyya Al Islamiyya), and “Islam and the Logic of Power” (Al Islam Wa Mantiq Al Quwwa), these 2 books are simply copy of Sayyed Qutb. But with a difference they were re-written by Shiite understanding.

- With the book of Sayyed Qutb, Jihadists were born; however, The same book re-written for Shiite understanding let Hezbollah, IRGC, Kassam Suleimani, Hasan Abbasi like groups and people.

Those two articles are what needs to be clarified by you. You have given no background info or any thing else to enlighten what matters to today's situation( Iran-ISIS alliance).

the topic is Iran-ISIS relation, i would like to remind you.

P.s: I don't think we are talking about the same Sayyed Qutb, therefore His influence over mullahs/shiites are clear.

I made it clear, the roots of extremist in the region has Salafi backgrounds and nothing to do with Iran or Shia ... their origins are from Egypt/Saudi Arabia and Indian subcontinent and their wrong/false interpretation of Islam .. and I made example to clarify it for you ISIS ain't the only terrorist group out there following such an ideology groups like Boko Haram , Al shabab ansar alsonnat are African ones and Lashkar-e-Taiba , Jaish-e-Mohammed and Sipah-e-Sahaba , Taliban , ALQ are Asian ones ...

and ISIS is outcome of a breed btw ALQ ( created in Afghanistan through cooperation btw the CIA, the ISI of Pakistan and Saudi ideology and Maddares) and former Iraqi Baath army commanders in Iraq back in 2006 ... both have been supported by Saudis and Americans for a while and Iran fought both of them ...
As I explained it the idea of establishing an Islamic state ain't limited to Qotb and many people before and after him have been interested in it ...
what I said about prophet of Islam was written in plain English , regarding Islamic state the prophet was the first one who established it and regarding Jihad you can find many versus in Quran... if people's understanding of Islamic state and Jihad are wrong it has nothing to do with the prophet of Islam.....

Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah was one of the Ayatollah Khomaini followers and started his political activities through his Islamic revolution ... how on earth his book was behind creating IRGC? IRGC at first were some fellows whom wanted to secure Ayatollah Khomaini return from exile and little by little turned to guardians of the revolution ....
 

SIRAJ WAHAB | Published — Thursday 6 October 2016


rtr2kxlw-780x439.jpg

Former Syrian Vice President Abdul Halim Khaddam. (Newsweek Middle East)​

Former Syrian Vice President Abdul Halim Khaddam believes that the United States is no longer capable of solving the problems in Syria.
“The situation (in Syria) is highly complicated because of the stand taken by each of the great powers, in particular the US and Russia,” said the 84-year-old Syrian politician who has been in Paris since he defected from Syria in 2005.
In an exclusive interview with Leila Hatoum of Newsweek Middle East, he said the ongoing war had become an international power struggle taking place on Syrian soil.
Khaddam served over two decades as vice president, first under Hafez Assad, from 1984 till 2000, and later under Bashar until 2005.
For a period of 37 days, Khaddam was Syria’s interim president between June and July 2000, after Hafez Assad’s death and before Bashar took over.
“When no one looks after those who are oppressed, it creates a situation of bottled anger which only leads to one result — explosion,” the magazine quoted Khaddam as saying.
“It is under these circumstances that Daesh came into existence, first in Iraq with the remnants of the former Iraqi regime, and then expanding to Syria and elsewhere,” he said.
Khaddam claimed that Daesh was nurtured by Iran, which he said “is working along the lines of creating a Sunni power to fight Sunnis in the region.”
He said he had hopes when US President Barack Obama was first elected president because of what he had heard of Obama and his respect for principles. “However, we did not see these principles in the case of Syria,” he said.
According to him, Obama failed to take the opportunity to renew US relations with the Arab and Muslim world. “All that the Syrians heard from Obama was that Assad must go,” said Khaddam, adding that Washington seemed to disregard its former allies in the Middle East in favor of new ones.
“It turned out there was a US-Russian agreement, and the US reconciled with Iran despite knowing that (Tehran) rules Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, and has mobilized the Houthis in Yemen to distract the Arab Gulf nations who are allies of the US.”
Khaddam said Russia managed to pull the rug from under the feet of the United States in Syria, and “Washington has no one but itself to blame.”
The US, he argued, made a mistake when it pushed its ally, Turkey, into Russia’s arms, thereby giving Moscow an upper hand in the conflict.
“The Americans were involved in the (failed) Turkish coup,” alleged Khaddam, a fact which left a bitter taste in Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s mouth. “The Russians received bonus points after tipping off Erdogan about the coup two days prior to the event.” (This claim remains uncorroborated.)
He further charged that Europe, the Americans, and the Arab nations failed to seize the opportunity to cut the war short and so spare the Syrian people a great deal of death and misery. “They did not take the necessary measures that they should have taken years ago (to topple the Assad regime),” explained Khaddam, “despite their knowledge that the regime in Syria was a murderous one.”
He said the US stabbed the Syrian opposition in the back, explaining that when the Syrian revolution began, people thought the US wanted to help.
Shortly before the revolution began, Syria’s chemical arsenal was evolving, and US President Barack Obama “took a decision to hit the Syrian regime and send the US Navy to the Syrian coast,” said Khaddam.
However, it seems that the Russians managed to convince the Americans that they would take care of the problem of Syria’s chemical arsenal.
“Even the Arab nations were relying on the Americans and the Russians because they thought that the superpowers had interests in the Arab world. But what was the result?” asked Khaddam, evincing clear disapproval of the course events have taken.
The new US administration must work on rebuilding the broken trust between Arab countries and Washington, said Khaddam. He admires Hillary Clinton. To him, she has political experience, unlike her Republican opponent Donald Trump.
He said though the Iranian regime considers itself a custodian of Syria; however, things were different during Hafez Assad’s time. “He never allowed the Iranians to intervene in Syrian affairs,” said Khaddam, citing one example of Iran’s attempts to expand in the region.
“During Hafez Assad’s time, an Iranian delegation arrived in Syria and attempted to convert some Muslim Alawite Syrians to Shia Islam. A group from the Alawites came from the coast to us and informed Assad of the matter. They complained the Iranians ‘came to change our faith,’ and Assad ordered his foreign minister to summon the Iranian ambassador to deliver an ultimatum: The delegation had 24 hours to leave Syria.”

Khaddam believes that cutting the supply line between Iran and its external groups is necessary, especially in the case of Hezbollah.
“Hezbollah’s presence is linked to the presence of the regime in Syria. And of course, Iran is the sectarian reference for this party, and supplies it with money. However, should Syria’s Iranian lifeline be cut, then Hezbollah won’t be able to stand on its feet. Hezbollah without the Syrian regime is worth nothing,” said Khaddam.
The same scenario is playing in Iraq, said Khaddam, who claimed that up to 50 percent of the Shiite population is against Iran. “Syria is the place which leads to Iraq, Lebanon and Palestine,” he added.

http://www.arabnews.com/node/994396/middle-east

The anti-Muslim and heretical Wilayat al-Faqih Mullah regime's influence will crumble and be limited to Southern Iraq (for the time being at least) once Syria has been liberated. That is why the Mullah's are pissing in their pants and have wasted billions upon billions of dollars and 1000's of mercenaries. Native as non-native. Without US and Russian involvement they would be unable to do anything as they are already ruling a failed pariah state which is almost bankrupt despite the empty bravado and North Korean (an ally, lol) style propaganda.

In the meantime Alawites have almost become extinct and at least 50.000 foreign Wilayat al-Faqih slaves have been eliminated.

I believe that Syrians should follow the example of the martyr and hero Ali Hassan al-Majid and



There should also be an obligatory "Final Solution" for every Wilayat al-Faqih slave in the Arab world. Instant death sentence. I believe that calling for this is a religious, moral and patriotic duty that should be propagandized 24/7 until the goal of extermination has been achieved.

I would personally volunteer for free to expose the few resident Wilayat al-Faqih slaves inside KSA whether native or non-native. Including on this forum and elsewhere. Let the intelligence service deal with them. This cancerous microscopic minority has caused enough of problems already and they should be dealt with once and for all. An example should be made out of them. One such spokesman became a headless chicken last year in KSA. Time for citizens everywhere in the Arab world to uphold the law on their own if the regimes/governments in power cannot do the necessary job.

A group aimed at this job should be formed immediately. Social media would be a great tool to spread the message. A coordinated mobilization is needed. Foot troops are not lacking nor enforcers.

A cancer once spotted, must be attacked as quickly as possible. Once regimes that represent the people will be put in place that cancer will be dealt with in the span of weeks if given free room.
Are Saudis that stupid to believe this old piece of shit lier??!!

He was hafez Vice President after he was partner in the crime he descied to be a humanists are you really that stupid to believe him or its iran obsession

Iranian posters here, want to blame a real Muslim nation like Turkey , while they continue to kill Sunni Muslims is disgusting!!
Syria will stay Muslim, once Assad the devil is gone!
Since when your nation or your government were islamic don't make laugh
 
Are Saudis that stupid to believe this old piece of shit lier??!!

He was hafez Vice President after he was partner in the crime he descied to be a humanists are you really that stupid to believe him or its iran obsession

I consider a person of his stature - a former Vice President of Syria between 1984 and 2005 (!) and a former interim president in 2000, to have more knowledge about the Al-Assad regime and their dealings with the Mullah's and Syria in general than everyone else here. It is not even a contest.

If you knew about his career you would know that he was one of the very few really high-ranking Syrian Sunni Arab politicians under the Al-Assad dynasty and that he fled Syria in 2005. He has also renounced his past.

Anyway I am not the one here who supports the Al-Assad regime. The Arab-obsessed Iranians here (who have nothing to do with any internal Arab matters yet are more obsessed about it than many Arabs, lol) are the ones who support the Al-Assad dynasty. Father as well as son.

Hafiz was the closest ally of the Mullah's in the Arab world.

Also are you denying official and public Mullah policies such as spreading their Wilayat al-Faqih ideology? They have tried/are doing this in Iraq as well. What should prevent them from doing it in Syria?

Moreover this news was published by Newsweek. A very serious news source.

Nothing that was said by Khaddam was illogical or contrary to the historical ground realities or present ones.

Lastly believe it or not I have no "obsession" whatsoever about Iran or have anything against Iranians regardless of ethnicity. I am against the Mullah policies in the Arab world. They can do what they want to do inside Iran. And neither am I an ignorant that does not know about the many similarities between Arabs and Iranians. However certain Iranians here obviously dislike Arabs solely due to being Arabs. There are also Arabs who dislike Iranians (Persians more precisely) for solely being Persians but I am certainly not one such person. If I am hostile it is because of similar hostility aimed at Arabs. If what you say was true I would not have had cordial ties with many Iranians here. The common thing with those Iranians is that they are not blind Mullah supporters. We disagree on certain political areas but that is it. There is no hostility other than political disagreements. Anyway why in the good world should I hate some Farsi in say Shiraz across the Gulf? Likely I would be unable to pick him apart from an Arab in the region unless he opened his mouth.

Also don't forget that most of the current Mullah's in Iran are Iranian Arabs or of Arab descent. So naturally, if we use your logic, I should like them.

@ResurgentIran being one of them. I have forgot the others as I have not seen them here for ages.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom