What's new

Collapse of Turkey’s Middle East policy

BLACKEAGLE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
10,919
Reaction score
2
Country
Jordan
Location
Jordan
Ankara needs to rethink its relations with all its neighbours — Syria first among them


The Arab Spring will undoubtedly go down in history as an important moment in the liberation of the Arab people from tyranny. But, like most major political upheavals, it has had a number of unfortunate and largely unforeseen consequences.
The economies of Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen have suffered serious damage; Syria’s ongoing civil war has resulted in heavy — and mounting — civilian casualties and material destruction; in the Sahel, violence and chaos have followed the overthrow of Libya’s Muammar Al Gaddafi, especially in Mali where Tawareq rebels backed by Islamist groups have seized a great chunk of the country; sectarian tensions have sharpened across the region causing all minorities to feel less secure; the Palestine cause has been consigned to the margins of international attention, while Israel, fully backed by the US, proceeds undisturbed with its land grab.
Turkey is yet another victim of the unforeseen consequence of the Arab Spring: its ambitious Middle East policy has collapsed. Two years ago, Turkey could claim to be the most successful country in the region. Its economy was booming. Its charismatic Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in power since 2002, enjoyed popularity at home and respect abroad.
The Turkish combination of democracy and Islam was hailed as a model for the region. Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, an academic turned statesman, was credited with devising a peaceful regional order, based on the principle of ‘zero problems with neighbours’.
A key pivot of Davutoglu’s new regional order was a Turkish-Syrian partnership, both commercial and political, which soon expanded into a free-trade zone embracing Turkey, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. Visas with these countries were abolished. Meanwhile, Turkish construction companies were active in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, as well as in Gaddafi’s Libya (where contracts were estimated at some $18 billion for roads, bridges, pipelines, ports, airports and much else besides.)
Buoyed by these successes, Turkey set about seeking to solve some of the region’s most obdurate conflicts. It tried hard to bring Syria and Israel to the negotiating table. Together with Brazil, it made what seemed a promising advance towards solving the problem of Iran’s nuclear programme. In Afghanistan, Turkish troops were the only foreign forces welcome, which seemed to presage a role for Ankara in negotiating a settlement with the Taliban.
In addition, Erdogan had hopes of reaching an entente with Turkey’s old rival, Greece, and of making peace at last with Armenia (a country still smarting from the harsh treatment of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks.) Above all, Erdogan seemed ready to make major political concessions to the Kurds of eastern Anatolia in a bid to end, once and for all, the long and violent struggle with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has claimed tens of thousands of lives.
Then the whole thing fell apart.
The deal which Turkey and Brazil negotiated with Iran over its nuclear facilities was rejected by Washington. Turkey’s overtures to Armenia got nowhere: the border remains closed. Turkey quarrelled violently with Israel when Israeli commandos boarded a Turkish ship, the Mavi Marmara, in international waters, and killed nine activists, most of them Turks, who were trying to break Israel’s cruel siege of Gaza. Israel has refused to apologise for its brutal behaviour.
Turkey’s hopes of better relations with Greece were dashed by Greece’s economic collapse. Moreover, having quarrelled with Turkey, Israel hurried to embrace Greece, as well as the Greek-speaking Republic of Cyprus, joining with it in the exploitation of gas finds in the eastern Mediterranean, to the anger of Turkish-speaking northern Cyprus and of Turkey itself.
On the commercial front, Gaddafi’s overthrow put an end to several big Turkish contracts in Libya, while Turkey’s expanding business with Saudi Arabia and the Arab Gulf states was dealt a harsh blow by the disruption of road traffic across Syria due to the uprising there.
Turkey’s once friendly relations with Iran suffered because they now found themselves on opposite sides of the Syrian conflict, while Turkish relations with Iraq suffered because of Turkey’s close ties with the autonomous Kurdish Regional Government in northern Iraq (including providing the KRG with facilities to export oil direct to Turkey, to the fury of Baghdad.)
Instead of ‘no problems with neighbours’, Turkey is now beset with grave problems on almost every front. Inevitably, Davutoglu’s star has waned. No longer the master strategist, he is seen as an amateur politician struggling to survive.
The real turning point was Turkey’s impetuous decision to back the Syrian rebels against President Bashar Al Assad’s regime. At a stroke, Turkey’s partnership with Syria collapsed, bringing down the whole of Turkey’s Arab policy. Instead of attempting to resolve the Syrian conflict by mediation — which it was well placed to do — Turkey took sides.
It provided house room in Istanbul for the civilian Syrian opposition and camps for the Free Syrian Army and other fighting groups. Under Turkish protection, the Syrian rebels now control a narrow strip of territory of some 70km along the Syrian-Turkish border.
Turkey and Syria are virtually at war. In retaliation to Turkey’s role in channelling funds, weapons and intelligence to the rebels, Syria seems to be encouraging the PKK — and its Syrian affiliate, the PYD — to turn up the heat on Turkey. The PYD has occupied five largely Kurdish towns in northern Syria, from which Syrian government forces were deliberately withdrawn. If Syria’s Kurds gain anything like the autonomy already enjoyed by Iraq’s Kurds, then Turkey’s own Kurds are bound to press their claims for political rights and freedoms.
In eastern Turkey, the PKK’s 28-year insurgency seems to be springing back to life with deadly ambushes against military targets, such as last Sunday’s attack which killed a dozen Turkish soldiers. The struggle to put a lid on Kurdish militancy could once again become Turkey’s most painful and disruptive domestic problem.
A real headache for Turkey is the massive influx of Syrian refugees. To stem the flood, Turkey has closed its frontier with Syria for the time being. Syrian refugees in Turkey are said to number over 80,000, lodged in nine tented camps. Five more camps are under construction, which could house another 30,000 refugees. Turkey says it cannot realistically take in more than about 100,000, without help from other countries and international organisations. Hosting the refugees has already cost Turkey an estimated 135 million euros (Dh624.1 million) — and no doubt will cost a great deal more.
Should Turkey revise its Syria policy? Instead of joining in Washington’s (and Israel’s) war against Tehran and Damascus, Ankara might be well advised to revert back, step by step, to a more neutral stance. Lakhdar Brahimi, the new UN peace envoy, needs Turkey’s help in his difficult task of mediating a peaceful resolution of the Syrian conflict. That would be the way to restore Turkey’s Middle East policy to its former glory. Turkey needs urgently to rethink its relations with all its neighbours — Syria first among them.

Patrick Seale is a commentator and author of several books on Middle East affairs.

Collapse of Turkey
 
They must rethink the whole situation. The problem in the foreign policy is coming from the roots of the Republic, tradition of diplomacy is something new for Turks. (I mean, we really don't understand a damn about diplomacy. Search Suleiman's letters to Habsburgs)

For a healthy foreign policy, you need to learn target countries' traditions, language etc. Many of Turkish diplomats only learn French and English.
Another problem is intel. MİT doesn't have the ability to go operations etc. All they can do is gathering intelligence. Other kind of operations are conducting by ÖKK personnels. MİT needs structural reform.
Turkish policymakers are one of the best in the world, especially in foreign policy and in economics. The problem is in inner bureucracy. We need a change. A big change.
 
They must rethink the whole situation. The problem in the foreign policy is coming from the roots of the Republic, tradition of diplomacy is something new for Turks. (I mean, we really don't understand a damn about diplomacy. Search Suleiman's letters to Habsburgs)

For a healthy foreign policy, you need to learn target countries' traditions, language etc. Many of Turkish diplomats only learn French and English.
Another problem is intel. MİT doesn't have the ability to go operations etc. All they can do is gathering intelligence. Other kind of operations are conducting by ÖKK personnels. MİT needs structural reform.
Turkish policymakers are one of the best in the world, especially in foreign policy and in economics. The problem is in inner bureucracy. We need a change. A big change.

Before I join this forum I had great respect and love for Turkey and it's people, but after dealing with many Turks here, I realized that the respect was not mutual, and I even got skeptical about Turkish real intentions behind it's current policy, as I believe Turkish members thoughts here reflect, albeit proportionally, of what Turkish people, in general, think of us. Nevertheless, if I drop the emotional side of me I would say:

I believe there was nothing wrong with Turkish foreign policy which was welcomed with pleasure by both people of the region and regimes, however, Turkish new foreign policy emerged in the worst times in the region dealing with the most sadistic and evil regimes and terrorists who belong to the same block. So, the problem wasn't in Turkish policy at all but unfortunately, all the odds turned against it at once. The writer should have differentiated between the regimes of Syria and Iraq and the people of the whole region as well as the Arab regimes, except for those two, who have great appreciation for it's heroic stances. As you know, the future is with the people not regimes, and people will always remember Turkey as the country that embraced their dreams of freedom and dignity. Thank you Turkey, thank you Ardogan...
 
Quick Google search found this:

"More than an excellent biography of Hafiz al-Asad, Syria's national leader, this is a tour de force of contemporary Syrian history and politics. Seale, a Middle Eastern specialist and a journalist, had direct access to Asad. Here is a clear successor to Seale's near monumental The Struggle for Syria (1965) and a substantial companion to Moshe Ma'oz's Asad: The Sphinx of Damascus; A Political Biography ( LJ 9/15/88). Seale perceives Asad as a masterful politician maneuvering Syria into a position of dominance in the Middle East and uncovers much of the mystery that has surrounded the Syrian leader by documenting Asad's interactions, directly and indirectly, with national and regional leaders. Well recommended and indeed required reading for anyone interested in the contemporary Middle East."

The book he wrote can be reached from here: Asad: The Struggle for the Middle East

Also watch this video to see how Seale does regime PR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They must rethink the whole situation. The problem in the foreign policy is coming from the roots of the Republic, tradition of diplomacy is something new for Turks. (I mean, we really don't understand a damn about diplomacy. Search Suleiman's letters to Habsburgs)

For a healthy foreign policy, you need to learn target countries' traditions, language etc. Many of Turkish diplomats only learn French and English.
Another problem is intel. MİT doesn't have the ability to go operations etc. All they can do is gathering intelligence. Other kind of operations are conducting by ÖKK personnels. MİT needs structural reform.
Turkish policymakers are one of the best in the world, especially in foreign policy and in economics. The problem is in inner bureucracy. We need a change. A big change.

joker:partay:
 
Erdogan did wrong, The only thing he did was destroying Turkish relationship with her powerful neighbors Iran and other neighbors. and nowadays Pkk are getting more strong.beside, erdugan let alqaede and Taliban and other extremist Islamist terrorist groups come to Syria-turkey border. and i'm sure in future they start some activities against turkey like what Pkk is doing and also their culture in south part of Turkey will get change. let's look at the Pakistan-Afghanistan border,that will happen for turkey.
and i am sure asad will stay at power, because majority of Syrian people are pro him and asad accepted reforms and it's not an dictatorship anymore and iran and russia are behind syria. the only way to change current regime in syria is an military invading by USA. the only looser in this Game was Turkey that destroyed her relationship with her neighbors and make pkk more strong and brought extremist Islamist terrorist around her borders.
other Turkish politicians know it very well and they are blaming erdugan.
 
erdogan did the biggest mistake like all middle eastern countries aspiring or power..instead of taking a sane logical approach benefiting Turkey and regional interests first - he went Pan Islamic...
 
Erdogan did wrong, The only thing he did was destroying Turkish relationship with her powerful neighbors Iran and other neighbors. and nowadays Pkk are getting more strong.beside, erdugan let alqaede and Taliban and other extremist Islamist terrorist groups come to Syria-turkey border. and i'm sure in future they start some activities against turkey like what Pkk is doing and also their culture will get change. let's look at the Pakistan-Afghanistan border,that will happen for turkey.
and i am sure asad will stay at power, because majority of Syrian people are pro him and asad accepted reforms and it's not an dictatorship anymore and iran and russia are behind syria. the only way to change current regime in syria is an military invading by USA. the only looser in this Game was Turkey that destroyed her relationship with her neighbors and make pkk more strong and brought extremist Islamist terrorist around her borders.
other Turkish politicians know it very well and they are blaming erdugan.

Turkish relationship deteriorated with the regimes of Syria and Iraq, while the people of Syria look up to Turkey with so much regard. Bashar Al-Assad will be ousted and Turkey will be in fierce alliance with the new Syria. As for Iraq, I believe political changes will get the regime out, as everything in the country, region and world is going against this regime. Iran block in the region has got a significant hit and will be crushed, in the hard way though where all countries in the region will be involved.

erdogan did the biggest mistake like all middle eastern countries aspiring or power..instead of taking a sane logical approach benefiting Turkey and regional interests first - he went Pan Islamic...

I believe his policy was perfect and aimed at advocating peace in the region but the dark evil block has foiled it. His policy had nothing to do with Islam.
 
Turkish relationship deteriorated with the regimes of Syria and Iraq, while the people of Syria look up to Turkey with so much regard. Bashar Al-Assad will be ousted and Turkey will be in fierce alliance with the new Syria. As for Iraq, I believe political changes will get the regime out, as everything in the country, region and world is going against this regime. Iran block in the region has got a significant hit and will be crushed, in the hard way though where all countries in the region will be involved.



I believe his policy was perfect and aimed at advocating peace in the region but the dark evil block has foiled them. His policy had nothing to do with Islam.

If Syrian Revolution will be successful, it is because of Turkey. You have no idea how much support we give to FSA. If they fail, Erdoğan's goverment will colapse.
His policy was wrong btw. We must push towards Central Asia, where we came and where our brothers live. Interfering to Arabs' business was not cool.
 
I don't think it is so much a failure of policy as that the realities that it was based on have changed so radicaly.
 
Iran is for Turkey (and vice versa) much more important than any Arab country in the region.

I don't think so, even tiny UAE has more weight and respect in international arenas more than Iran. Iran is only know for her resonant slogans, that's all. Regarding Turkey, I don't think it's more important than KSA.

Building our whole foreign policy on being the leader of the Islamic World and expecting stable relations with the countries in Middle East and North Africa was the biggest mistake...

So yes, it is failure of policy.

A close friend and ally, yes. Leader? absolutely no.
 
Back
Top Bottom