danger007
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 10,007
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
You are right ! China need a war. US is no way, Rusia is little bit stronger, Japan is too tough. Phillipine is too weak and be backed up by US. India and Vietnam are suitable. Fight with India is too risky, maybe China lost and by the way Tibet will bye bye China. Vietnam is much weaker than India, sure China can win, China need a certain victory....he..he...is this your thinking corward chicken China ?
But when you fight with Vietnam, you can win partly at the very early but then you suffer so much that you cannot imagine. You will get stuck in a terrible war-mud. If you fight with India you lost, Tibet bye bye, you fight with Vietnam, you win or lost ( maybe you win fast ), you don't lost Tibet, you lost nothing...because you are not exist anymore. Why ? While you get stuck with the war-mud , US, Rusia and India will be very eager, very willing to give you several dosmetic issues, give you some fire and it will soon burst into huge flame then break your country into 2,3 may be 4 nations. Vietnam will be back to the stone age ( our men are ready to play monumentally with you...to the last soldier ) but China is no more. Fair enough ?
India might be more stronger than Vietnam but China is also stronger than us.... I am not saying stronger will always win.... But incase of war, We have to fight let our enemy weaker or stronger..... But both sides will surely suffer with war..... I hope china will learn to respect small countries like Philippines and Vietnamese .....