Hahaha..I can't but laugh.
Are you seriously this retarded, that you believe, you can fool anyone, this.
1. Tell me again, what did I imply.
2. To actually which statement do you need proof too?
The test was against a medium-range ballistic missile with a range of 1,500 kilometers. Franz-Stefan Gady of The Diplomat speculates that this was the first test of the new indigenous imaging infrared (IIR) seeker, which was developed to help the interceptors distinguish warheads from decoy/dummies.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...n-now-take-decoys-thats-really-big-deal-28627
In March 2009, India conducted a test using shiplaunched Dhanush missile (naval version of the Prithvi missile) as the target with a missile range of 1,500 km. Swordfish (the LRTR) radar was used for tracking and destroyed using a PAD missile at an altitude of 75 km
https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/...ions-of-India’s-Ballistic-Missile-Defense.pdf
3. You claimed that actual range of Babur SLCM is the same as that Babur LACM,
For proof you presented this statement - a quote of Chinese Global times - requoted by Indian express.
That in future range of Pakistani nuclear missiles will increase.
The Pakistani test comes soon after India tested its Agni IV and V series of missiles earlier this month, sparking a warning from Pakistan’s long-term ally, China. In an acerbic January 4 editorial, the state-owned Global Times warned that ‘India has broken the UN's limits on its development of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missile,’ adding: ''If the UNSC has no objection over this, let it be. The range of Pakistan's nuclear missiles will also see an increase.''
http://www.newindianexpress.com/wor...-ticket-to-elite-nuke-triad-club-1557958.html
How dishonest and full hot air, you are!!
Are you seriously this retarded, that you believe, you can fool anyone, this.
EPIC FAIL!
View attachment 531769
You implied that india was as already testing them so let's have it.
View attachment 531768
^^^ and here, your own indian express is saying that the range will increase.
NOW WHERE IS your PROOF on your claim? or are you gonna be a typical indian rat and run away from your own claim?![]()
1. Tell me again, what did I imply.
2. To actually which statement do you need proof too?
The test was against a medium-range ballistic missile with a range of 1,500 kilometers. Franz-Stefan Gady of The Diplomat speculates that this was the first test of the new indigenous imaging infrared (IIR) seeker, which was developed to help the interceptors distinguish warheads from decoy/dummies.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...n-now-take-decoys-thats-really-big-deal-28627
In March 2009, India conducted a test using shiplaunched Dhanush missile (naval version of the Prithvi missile) as the target with a missile range of 1,500 km. Swordfish (the LRTR) radar was used for tracking and destroyed using a PAD missile at an altitude of 75 km
https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/...ions-of-India’s-Ballistic-Missile-Defense.pdf
3. You claimed that actual range of Babur SLCM is the same as that Babur LACM,
For proof you presented this statement - a quote of Chinese Global times - requoted by Indian express.
That in future range of Pakistani nuclear missiles will increase.
The Pakistani test comes soon after India tested its Agni IV and V series of missiles earlier this month, sparking a warning from Pakistan’s long-term ally, China. In an acerbic January 4 editorial, the state-owned Global Times warned that ‘India has broken the UN's limits on its development of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missile,’ adding: ''If the UNSC has no objection over this, let it be. The range of Pakistan's nuclear missiles will also see an increase.''
http://www.newindianexpress.com/wor...-ticket-to-elite-nuke-triad-club-1557958.html
How dishonest and full hot air, you are!!