In my opinion the hostility was started from your side by staging the tribal invasion of Kashmir. That was the start of it all.
Ladies and Gentleman, that was Schultz's opinion.
It was the PAF that fired the first salvo by attacking 8 Indian airfields on the 3rd of December 1971, India action followed consequently. The unrest in East Pakistan was created due to the denial of political rights and discrimination against East Pakistan and the consequent heavy handed behavior of the Pakistan Army, remember Operation Searchlight and the consequent massacre and rape that followed.
So are you claiming that India had nothing to do with the break up of East and West Pakistan back then?
Seriously, how one-sided and blind can a person be?
We rush to the aid of people where ever we can, India contributes to international aid in a much larger way than Pakistan can ever afford to. Just that in 1971 the high handed attitude of the Pakistan Army had created a huge refugee problem in India. Millions of Bengali's fleeing the prosecution in East Pakistan fled to India and this created a huge refugee problem for us(i.e trying to feed them and give them relief, this put immense pressure on our civil system but we still did not turn them back).
Yeah, you sure do rush to the aid of the Kashmiris living in Indian held Kashmir..
(sarcasm)
India can ofcourse contribute much larger financially to international aid due to it's economy, you don't have to brag about that, we know that aswell, but hey, Pakistan contributes and sends its soldiers in much larger numbers outside our country to help stabilize and protect other countries/innocent people, now how about that for a d!ck-measuring contest.
Do you want a tap on the back btw for portraying India as a country which never turns down any plea for help?
It takes just two years to build a dam, if we wanted to do it we could very easily have done it in the past and dried your rivers. Just that we didn't do so in spite of having the capability, should be reason enough for you to believe that we didn't want stoop to such low levels. But if still don't want to believe it then don't, we here are not new to dealing with people who prefer to live in a state of self proclaimed paranoia.
That's not paranoia, that's just common sense and awareness, India will use all means to force Pakistan into doing what it likes, and holding off water is something which the Indians will most certainly keep in mind in future conflicts which will hopefully not occur between both countries.
Are you talking of stooping to low levels?
You talk as if Indian people are model citizens, you call Pakistanis paranoid because they fear that India might use its water advantage to pressurize Pakistan, but what about your government officials who see every country bordering India as a threat to India's stability?
Indians are paranoid theirselves over Pakistan, the coin has two sides, whatever you say, I can throw right back at you, simply because India isn't so innocent and well hearted as you claim it to be in your previous posts.
As for the releasment of Hafiz Saeed, it's simply stupid for crying out loud to believe that the GoP would release him even if it had received proper and convincing evidence that he was indeed the mastermind or was involved in the Mumbai attacks.
Do you really think that when the GoP unleashes hell on the militants, and wants the nation to stand with them to honestly and decisively eliminate these Taliban scumbags, that they'll simply release the likes of Hafiz Saeed afterwards?
To me, it looks like All-Green is correct, without further proof, he cannot be taken into further custody or be locked away, now if he would've been locked in jail without having absolutely
NOTHING to do with the Mumbai drama, you'd hear Indians whining about Pakistan's judiciary system and saying that Pakistan locks up innocent people and that their constitution is not being followed etc.
I'm 100% sure we'd have the likes of you pointing fingers at a "corrupt" Pakistan where free men are locked up in jail without having the chance of getting a trial and so fort.
No sir, it's simple, the Indian government most likely hasn't provided adequate proof to show the GoP that this Hafiz had something to do with the whole drama.
Talking about Indian proof, we all know how the Mumbai drama unfolded and how India reacted on it, it was quite hilarious, not the drama itself and the victims, all respect to them ofcourse, but the way the GoI handled it and the way the whole nation got brainwashed mainly by their own media.
Ah,
proof, evidence, these words were so common back then when it happened not too long ago.
The releasment of Hafiz Saeed either means that the GoP is not sincere and pure in its approach and fight against rooting out militancy and its network, or the GoI simply wasn't convincing nor had it handed sufficient evidence for this man to be convicted and locked up in Pakistani jails.
Remembering India's record when it comes to pointing fingers at Pakistan without showing adequate proof, I'd say that India simply missed her chance to get this man locked up away ******* in jail.
However, as All-Green righteously pointed out, i'm sure aswell that the GoP is strongly monitoring Hafiz Saeed and is keeping an eye on him at all times, perhaps he might bite the dust sooner or later, it depends on his actions though.
Anyways, our political and judicial system must remain intact and honest if we are willing to be a stable country once again, we pull a Gitmo on these people nor anything else which comes near it.
Fair trials must be given, and if there is enough proof or indications that a person is guilty of commiting a crime, then he/she must be punished accordingly.
That's the way things work, and now ofcourse Indians would like to see the rules of law bent for them or twisted around just like they wanted it to happen during the Mumbai episode only to see their wishes fulfilled and hearts content, but things simply don't work that way, live with it, or do something about it, that's all I can say.
....its a chicken and egg story.......
