What's new

Brazil [Butantan Institute] researchers now say China’s Sinovac vaccine is 50% effective — even lower than announced earlier

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
35,188
Reaction score
30
Country
United States
Location
United States

  • Brazil’s Butantan Institute is the first to complete late-stage trial of CoronaVac, a Covid-19 vaccine developed by China’s Sinovac Biotech.
  • The institute had said last week that late-stage trial data showed CoronaVac was 78% effective among volunteers with mild to severe infections, reported the Wall Street Journal.
  • But on Tuesday, the institute said the vaccine’s overall efficacy rate fell to 50.4% when including “very mild” cases that did not require medical assistance, the Journal reported.

The Covid-19 vaccine developed by China’s Sinovac Biotech is just 50.4% effective in a Brazilian trial — barely meeting the threshold for regulatory approval and well below the initially reported efficacy rate, according to several media reports.
Brazil is the first to complete late-stage trial of the vaccine CoronaVac. The state-run Butantan Institute has been criticized by scientists and health experts for a lack of transparency in making public its trial data.

The institute reportedly delayed releasing trial results three times — which it blamed on a confidentially clause in its contract with Sinovac — and last week announced partial data that showed an efficacy rate that was later revised much lower.

Butantan said last week that CoronaVac was 78% effective among volunteers with mild to severe infections, reported the Wall Street Journal. But the institute said Tuesday that the overall efficacy rate fell to 50.4% when including “very mild” cases that did not require medical assistance, the Journal reported.

In comparison, Covid vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna were found to be about 95% effective in their late-stage trials.

Sinovac did not immediately respond to CNBC’s emailed request for comment.

Hope for China’s vaccines
Brazil and other developing nations have pinned their hopes on Chinese vaccines as wealthier countries snap up vaccines developed in the West.

Sinovac’s CoronaVac vaccine is also cheaper and easier to transport because it can be stored in ordinary refrigerators — unlike the vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna that must be kept at subfreezing temperatures.
The South American country has reported more than 8.1 million Covid infections in total, the third highest number globally, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. The country’s death toll of over 204,000 is the second highest in the world, Hopkins data showed.
Butantan has requested for CoronaVac to be authorized for emergency use, reported Reuters. Brazil’s health regulator Anvisa, which has stipulated a minimum 50% efficacy rate for vaccines in the pandemic, said it will meet on Sunday to decide, the news agency said.

Trials in other countries
In addition to Brazil, other developing countries including Turkey and Indonesia are also conducting trials on CoronaVac.

Indonesia on Monday approved the vaccine for emergency use — the first country outside China to do so after interim data from a late-stage trial showed that CoronaVac was 65.3% effective, reported Reuters.
 
It is unlikely that Sinovac would give any reply. Because it is not used to any accountability under the protection of CCP.
Come on China, you exported such a potent virus, why are you exporting such a weak vaccine? 😜😜
Brazil at least decided to do a test before inoculation with this vaccine. Imagine the plight of Chinese population that is being administered this vaccine without any knowledge about its efficacy and without any say in it.
Very soon Chinese bots would be here blindly defending Sinovac and calling names for doubting Sinovac.
 
look all traditional vaccines will be around 50-70% effective
while mRNA vaccine will be around 80-90% effective

having said mRNA vaccine will be more expensive to make, almost impossible to distribute and much more side effects
in end IMO, the traditional approach will be much better why?

because it will be very difficult to get the mRNA distributed and manufactured ..

the key is to vaccinate alot of people qickly rather then how effective the vaccine is
 
Yes, vaccinating a large population would be the best solution. But, the problem is in securing adequate number of doses for that. Hopefully, vaccine producers would ramp it up but even then it would take a lot of tIme.
The next issue is affordability. A lot of poor nations don’t have the money to buy it in adequate numbers.
The last issue is to create a supply chain and create protocols to administer the vaccine to the most vulnerable in the society.
India has done multiple dry runs and prepared a comprehensive plan to address all these issues. Advantage here is that India also happens to be one of the biggest suppliers of the vaccine. How does the dry runs pan out and implemented actually is something that is to be seen.
All governments need to aggressively work on all the aspects, then only we can see end of this pandemic. Fingers crossed.🤞
 
look all traditional vaccines will be around 50-70% effective
while mRNA vaccine will be around 80-90% effective

having said mRNA vaccine will be more expensive to make, almost impossible to distribute and much more side effects
in end IMO, the traditional approach will be much better why?

because it will be very difficult to get the mRNA distributed and manufactured ..

the key is to vaccinate alot of people qickly rather then how effective the vaccine is

the mRNA virus clinical trials did not seem to run PCR tests on all symptomatic patients.



"Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group."

They also conducted their trials on the general population, while Sinovac conducted their trials primarily on healthcare workers who have a higher exposure dose.
 
the mRNA virus clinical trials did not seem to run PCR tests on all symptomatic patients.



"Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group."

They also conducted their trials on the general population, while Sinovac conducted their trials primarily on healthcare workers who have a higher exposure dose.
the mRNA virus clinical trials did not seem to run PCR tests on all symptomatic patients.



"Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group."

They also conducted their trials on the general population, while Sinovac conducted their trials primarily on healthcare workers who have a higher exposure dose.
As you dont know what you are talking about i will leave the discussion here
Besides its too complex for this forum

But there are several methodology issue with sinovac trial
 
An American professor claimed that Pfizer’s vaccine is only 29% effective, while Pfizer himself claims that the vaccine’s effective rate is 95%
 
An American professor claimed that Pfizer’s vaccine is only 29% effective, while Pfizer himself claims that the vaccine’s effective rate is 95%

Yes, a an outspoken anti-vaxxer says he doesn't like the vaccine and he twisted the numbers to prove it...what a shocker.
 
Back
Top Bottom