Kabira
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,383
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
LOL this is like the 1000th time this forum has posted MPI without realising the data used for India is like 7 years older than Pakistan's:
http://www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/global-mpi-2016/#tables
Download and check yourself.
Their own FAQ:
http://www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/mpi-faqs/
Why does national data for the MPI date from so many different years? Isn’t it unfair to compare countries if the statistics in one case are five years older than in another? The MPI relies on the most recent and reliable data available since 2005. However surveys are taken in different years, and some countries do not have recent data. In order to facilitate the analysis, the year of the survey is reported in the MPI tables. The difference in dates limits direct cross country comparisons, as circumstances may have improved, or deteriorated, in the intervening years. Naturally, this is a stimulus for country government to collect new surveys that reflect more recent progress better. A significant number of DHS and MICS household surveys are currently underway and it is expected that more recent data will be available soon for a number of countries.
Let me just tag those that gave you thumbs up so they get this in their heads too.
@Kaptaan @friendly_troll96 @member.exe
If MPI is indeed so much better than India's, why is Pakistans infant mortality rate and hunger index abhorrently bad compared to India (15 years behind in the case of IMR)?
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN?locations=IN-PK
http://ghi.ifpri.org/
If data is old then why India's 2016 MPI figures are changed? They are taking in to account new developments. Indian own government poverty line on the other hand can't be taken seriously to compare it with any country. Next you will say World Bank poverty rank is also from old data.