undercover JIX
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 9,146
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Thank you Sir Ji, Shukar hai kisi ko to samajh aai meri angraizi ki.Sir this is an excellent post - gulabi or no gulabi.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you Sir Ji, Shukar hai kisi ko to samajh aai meri angraizi ki.Sir this is an excellent post - gulabi or no gulabi.
Either he tasted the rainbow and it was not to his taste, or he ventured off trying to find the pot of gold at the end of one with no avail..
I knew I would get this response and I wanted this kind of a response. It's just ridiculous, right? Calling you Arabidesh/Arabistan/Arabis when you ditched even the local script?Sri Ganga Ma flows within Bharat, Hindustan, India......and is very near and dear to all Hindus, if not all Indians. while Pakistan is not even part of the Middle East or even share border with any Arab land.
But we sure has ancient River Indus flowing through Pakistan...find a word using "Indus".
So please try to make some sense, someone gave you a chance to voice your opinion, at least try to use a little of your ancient wisdom.
I hope, I did not say anything offensive which you can report.
infestation overload.
you are rightly calling it ridiculousness, no comparison....similarity,,,,,I knew I would get this response and I wanted this kind of a response. It's just ridiculous, right? Calling you Arabidesh/Arabistan/Arabis when you ditched even the local script?
I'll go one level down in ridiculousness now. How will it feel if we call you Punjabistan/Pashtunistan? Will the others who are not Punjabi/Pashtun get offended?
Are you trolling yourself here?you are rightly calling it ridiculousness, no comparison....similarity,,,,,
Please try again and think before you post. I assume you are smart enough to know and I do not need to explain.
Thanks
no.Are you trolling yourself here?
My last question and reply for you.
If the words are still on the list, they're not allowed.Astonishing to see people trying to justifying calling nationals with a name they are not comfortable to be called as. Any degree of civility will tell you that you call people with names they like to be called with and not with what you feel they should be called.
Moreover are we in a race to invent words and then call each other by those? Do we have any history of people in this part of south asia called as Gangu, even in Pakistan?
Identities are not enforced, neither people accept them on the fly.
@AgNoStiC MuSliM after pages of "allowed discussion", have you arrived to conclusion yet?
With respect to the argument by some Pakistani posters that the word 'India' is derived from 'Indus' which is in Pakistan, not India, I would suggest using the terms Bharat/Bharatis, Hindustan/Hindustanis.
There are a few threads on this topic with some excellent posts/arguments. I suggest going through them in order to avoid this thread getting hijacked.That's a unique kind of argument I am hearing that people somehow get feeling of copyright violation if someone keep a name influenced by an object which exist in there country. People name their kids influenced by other region, languages and even religion. Isn't the case with Pakistanis?
Not even getting into argument that after partition some part of IVC still falls into Indian territory. The name India came into existence when Pakistan doesn't exist as a nation. Once the name exists, anyone can use the name who likes it, how come its etymology restrict the use? Pakistan should have contested to keep this name if they liked. You didn't, we did. Its not trademarked.
Rather it should a matter of pride for Pakistan.
If the words are still on the list, they're not allowed.
There are obviously some common slurs that are not on the list that we expect posters to realize are not acceptable without being on the list (the N-word for example).
With respect to the argument by some Pakistani posters that the word 'India' is derived from 'Indus' which is in Pakistan, not India, I would suggest using the terms Bharat/Bharatis, Hindustan/Hindustanis.
If the words are still on the list, they're not allowed.
There are obviously some common slurs that are not on the list that we expect posters to realize are not acceptable without being on the list (the N-word for example).
With respect to the argument by some Pakistani posters that the word 'India' is derived from 'Indus' which is in Pakistan, not India, I would suggest using the terms Bharat/Bharatis, Hindustan/Hindustanis.
Proceed kind sirI have an humble submission to make.
strange creatures INDIANS are, preaching civility and ethics....If the words are still on the list, they're not allowed.
There are obviously some common slurs that are not on the list that we expect posters to realize are not acceptable without being on the list (the N-word for example).
With respect to the argument by some Pakistani posters that the word 'India' is derived from 'Indus' which is in Pakistan, not India, I would suggest using the terms Bharat/Bharatis, Hindustan/Hindustanis.
if that wer true would the likes of joe the bengali white gentleman and his new sidekick nilgiri be allowed to constantly wipe the floor with Pakistan and Pakistan-flag displayers? in one post you see them flattering/fellating some senior mod, in another you will see joe using the head of a junior as a mop, yet in another you will see him slandering Pakistan
BTW. it is also very very likely the joe inglish is gonna be made a moderator of upcoming sub-forum dedicated to durga mata i.e bharatvarsh