What's new

Bangladesh improves 11 steps in new GFP ranking. Now 45th strongest military in the world.

GFP measures many variables. It is expected to be dismissed by those who have a false sense of their country's power relative to others.
 
.
GFP measures many variables. It is expected to be dismissed by those who have a false sense of their country's power relative to others.

The list is BULLSHIT.

I refuse to believe Bangaldesh is more capable than the UAE.
 
Last edited:
.
GFP measures many variables. It is expected to be dismissed by those who have a false sense of their country's power relative to others.
It is misleading at the least if not outright nonsense. A country's potential power is based on far more variables than what GFP whittles it down to. GFP is afflicted with the shiny toy syndrome, I.e. whosoever has the biggest defense budget gets to the top (I am not saying some don't deserve to be up there) but there are very many intangibles that are missing from their simplistic assumptions.

By the way, this is in no way a slight to my BD friends. My comment was specific to GFP not their ranking of BD.
 
.
It is misleading at the least if not outright nonsense. A country's potential power is based on far more variables than what GFP whittles it down to. GFP is afflicted with the shiny toy syndrome, I.e. whosoever has the biggest defense budget gets to the top (I am not saying some don't deserve to be up there) but there are very many intangibles that are missing from their simplistic assumptions.

By the way, this is in no way a slight to my BD friends. My comment was specific to GFP not their ranking of BD.

Not true. In fact, use the comparison tool for UAE v Bangladesh, which the poster before you is upset about.

Goes to show that nobody actually reads how the rankings are calculated.
 
.
why do you sound like beiruni?

Who is beiruni?

The list is BULLSHIT.

I refuse to believe Bangaldesh is indeed more capable than the UAE.

List is BS indeed but BD is more capable than UAE without a shadow of a doubt.

Yes, UAE has a lot of expensive toys but that's not the only thing that matters. About 90% of UAE population are expats. Their local population is about 1 million and rest are foreigners on visas. When a war breaks out, all these foreigners will leave and it will bring the country to a standstill, that country is literally run by foreigners. Remaining 1 million, LOL. BD has 1 million people in one of the smallest suburbs of Dhaka.
 
.
Bangladesh armed forces is now 45th strongest in the world according to Global Firepower Index 2019. Last year it was 56th. Most notable inclusion is 340 pieces of Towed Artillery in their list which earlier they showed zero. But defence budget is still showing outdated 1.59 billion US dollar figure. According to IISS 2018, Bangladesh has 841 pieces of Artillery. Last year's defence budget was 3.50 billion US dollar.
https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp
https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=bangladesh

Global Firepower is actually disgusting, they put Israel behind freaking Indonesia.

GFP measures many variables. It is expected to be dismissed by those who have a false sense of their country's power relative to others.

It sucks, end of story. It put Indonesia, I repeat, Indonesia, above Israel.

BD is more capable than UAE without a shadow of a doubt.

The UAE has almost 150 Vipers/2000s, and their Vipers in particular are quite lethal, belonging to the latest batch and literally being described as a cheaper alternative to the F-35. They've also got about 30 Rafales on order.

Bangladesh, on the other hand, has less than 40 Fishcans and only 8 Fulcrums. Not only that, but the UAE's air force has far more combat experience.

This edge in airpower is enough to conclude that the UAE is more powerful than Bangladesh by a significant margin.

And if you want to discuss who would win in a war, the UAE would have the ability to hit Bangladesh pretty hard using economical warfare alone, bringing in their military wouldn't even be necessary.
 
.
Global Firepower is actually disgusting, they put Israel behind freaking Indonesia.



It sucks, end of story. It put Indonesia, I repeat, Indonesia, above Israel.



The UAE has almost 150 Vipers/2000s, and their Vipers in particular are quite lethal, belonging to the latest batch and literally being described as a cheaper alternative to the F-35. They've also got about 30 Rafales on order.

Bangladesh, on the other hand, has less than 40 Fishcans and only 8 Fulcrums. Not only that, but the UAE's air force has far more combat experience.

This edge in airpower is enough to conclude that the UAE is more powerful than Bangladesh by a significant margin.

At least I understand why you aren't getting the rankings.

Good luck winning a war with 150 aircraft.
 
.
Good luck winning a war with 150 aircraft.

You dense idiot, they have almost 150 top of the line 4th gen fighter/attack aircraft, where as Bangladesh has less than 50 fighter/attack aircraft, and only 8 of them are even 4th gen (the rest are 3rd gen).

If you think Bangladesh could beat the UAE in a war, you're not normal.
 
.
You dense idiot, they have almost 150 top of the line 4th gen fighter/attack aircraft, where as Bangladesh has less than 50 fighter/attack aircraft, and only 8 of them are even 4th gen (the rest are 3rd gen).

If you think Bangladesh could beat the UAE in a war, you're not normal.

Where do you land a plane if ground forces take over your base?

If you think airpower, especially that small of an amount, can win a war alone, start reading.
 
.
Where do you land a plane if ground forces take over your base?

Ground forces won't be able to do anything if they don't have air support, unless they intend on waging guerilla warfare.

The UAE's ground forces are also much better equipped than their Bangladeshi counterparts.

If you think airpower, especially that small of an amount, can win a war alone, start reading.

If you think Bangladesh is more powerful than the UAE, you need to do more than just read.
 
.
^ I'll stick with GFP over airplane nonsense, cheers.
 
.
Ground forces won't be able to do anything if they don't have air support, unless they intend on waging guerilla warfare.

The UAE's ground forces are also much better equipped than their Bangladeshi counterparts.



If you think Bangladesh is more powerful than the UAE, you need to do more than just read.
Where do u find the patience to argue with this retard? Leave it, stupidity has no cure.

Where do you land a plane if ground forces take over your base?

If you think airpower, especially that small of an amount, can win a war alone, start reading.
Wtf jani?:hitwall:
 
.
Global Firepower is actually disgusting, they put Israel behind freaking Indonesia.



It sucks, end of story. It put Indonesia, I repeat, Indonesia, above Israel.



The UAE has almost 150 Vipers/2000s, and their Vipers in particular are quite lethal, belonging to the latest batch and literally being described as a cheaper alternative to the F-35. They've also got about 30 Rafales on order.

Bangladesh, on the other hand, has less than 40 Fishcans and only 8 Fulcrums. Not only that, but the UAE's air force has far more combat experience.

This edge in airpower is enough to conclude that the UAE is more powerful than Bangladesh by a significant margin.

And if you want to discuss who would win in a war, the UAE would have the ability to hit Bangladesh pretty hard using economical warfare alone, bringing in their military wouldn't even be necessary.

I don't know why you are giving a tally of how many vipers they have. I already know they have many advanced weapons. But that's not the point. UAE can hardly be called a nation or a state. 90% of it's population is expat and local population is only about 1 million. Their entire country will come to a grinding standstill the moment war breaks out, they won't even have water supply, sweage operating properly or electricity working properly.

BD is not a great power, it's not even a strong enough military power for it's size of population and economy, but that does not mean a comparison can be made with a country like UAE. Same goes about countries like Singapore, they have very advanced weapons and the backing of USA but on their own they are nothing.
 
.
I don't know why you are giving a tally of how many vipers they have. I already know they have many advanced weapons. But that's not the point. UAE can hardly be called a nation or a state. 90% of it's population is expat and local population is only about 1 million. Their entire country will come to a grinding standstill the moment war breaks out, they won't even have water supply, sweage operating properly or electricity working properly.

BD is not a great power, it's not even a strong enough military power for it's size of population and economy, but that does not mean a comparison can be made with a country like UAE. Same goes about countries like Singapore, they have very advanced weapons and the backing of USA but on their own they are nothing.
Mate, UAE has the direct backing of the west so there country wont come to a standstill. There allies wont allow u to block UAEs shipping lanes even if ur navy could block them which u cant actually. UAE and Bengka cant go to war due to three factors 1) the distance between the two states. 2) both countries lack amphibious landing and transport capability. 3) both lack long range bombers for ariel assaults. But lets imagine a scenario where u woukd he next to each other well, there airforce would knck out ur airforce the first day. Even a child knws that whatever the size of ur army, once aircover is gone, bye bye conventional war, it all gorilla for there. If u attempt conventional war with an adversory that has complete air superirotiy over u, well it will be a massacre, there areil assets will have a field day with ur advancing columns.
 
.
Mate, UAE has the direct backing of the west so there country wont come to a standstill. There allies wont allow u to block UAEs shipping lanes even if ur navy could block them which u cant actually. UAE and Bengka cant go to war due to three factors 1) the distance between the two states. 2) both countries lack amphibious landing and transport capability. 3) both lack long range bombers for ariel assaults. But lets imagine a scenario where u woukd he next to each other well, there airforce would knck out ur airforce the first day. Even a child knws that whatever the size of ur army, once aircover is gone, bye bye conventional war, it all gorilla for there. If u attempt conventional war with an adversory that has complete air superirotiy over u, well it will be a massacre, there areil assets will have a field day with ur advancing columns.

Mate, nobody is talking about BD going all the way to Arabian gulf and fighting UAE. It's about a comparison of that GFP put forth, in a comparison BD is definitely ahead in terms of war survival. We have land and natural resources, with that huge population we can still feed them during war time, we can even go foraging to survive, worst case scenario we can take a hit of 50% population being wiped out due to hunger, we have done so during the Bangal famine in the time of British raj. UAE has nothing, absolutely nothing to function as a state apart from their oil and gas. They don't have the most important thing the human resource, they don't have water sources and an agriculture to speak of.

Don't behave like a shiny toy fanboy, war of survival does not work like that.
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom