Bangladesh military 57th most-powerful in the world

[Al-zakir]

@Bilal9 bhai, exactly, but if someone doubt them ( anyone in this forum ) as false flagger , then some original sanghi ( under Indian flag) come to defend them by trying to perform gang attack .
They take it personally, although nothing is indicated to them ( keyboard warrior sanghis).
হরি ঘরে কে রে, আমি কলা খাইনি, এই অবস্থা এইগুলার।

No, some Pakistani started to hating Bd people as some Bd people hate them.

Hisab barbar my friend.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

No, some Pakistani started to hating Bd people as some Bd people hate them.

Hisab barbar my friend.

Not actually. Crux of the problem is, some Pakistani has a very patronizing attitude towards Bengali people and has a sense of superiority/inferiority complex and tendency to abuse in slightest provocation.

 

[bluesky]

Dude PK and MM both are military country, they squeezed everything they can from the people. The war doctrine for both the country is "Live of the Land".

BD is not like that. No enterprise is run by military in USA/China/Russia/Korea or any other country.
So dont bring bad example for us to follow.

No, you are wrong. Bangladesh military is following what started in Pakistan time. PA had started quite a few enterprises of their own, because the govt. alone cannot bear their welfare expenses. BD is following the same good path and no one should criticize it.

 

[BDforever]

Yeah Bangladesh sent two love letters to Myanmar with few videos of ICBM. All I can see is few ladies in the videos.

stop avoiding the topic, you supported GP that BA does not have artillery howitzer but pictures and videos proved you wrong, admit it.

 

[bluesky]

Not actually. Crux of the problem is, some Pakistani has a very patronizing attitude towards Bengali people and has a sense of superiority/inferiority complex and tendency to abuse in slightest provocation.

It is only because the word PAKISTAN had no 'B'.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

It is only because the word PAKISTAN had no 'B'.

Pakistanis so much emphasize on the acronym of their country that I wonder if Gujarat was a muslim majority state, then what would have happened? Perhaps they would have declared that Gujarat can not join Pakistan because 'G' can't be accommodated within the name. They want entire Jammu & Kashmir, but there is no Jammu's 'J' in the name. Just because there is no 'B' in the name of the country, so they thought East Bengal/Pakistan was expendable for other benefit/concession from India such as Kashmir concession. That's why they invented the epic theory of 'defence of East Pakistan lies in West Pakistan.'

 

[bluesky]

Pakistanis so much emphasize on the acronym of their country that I wonder if Gujarat was a muslim majority state, then what would have happened? Perhaps they would have declared that Gujarat can not join Pakistan because 'G' can't be accommodated within the name.

It is also true that the Pakistanis did not intentionally include Hyderabad of Nizam, only because the acronym 'H' is not in the word, PAKISTAN. Some Pakistani PDF members love to talk forcefully and try to impose a false interpretation. A similar falsification of events before and in 1971 caused the creation of Bangladesh. But, they will conclude all were conspiracy by the Hindus and India.

 

[Green Arrow]

It is also true that the Pakistanis did not intentionally include Hyderabad of Nizam, only because the acronym 'H' is not in the word, PAKISTAN. Some Pakistani PDF members love to talk forcefully and try to impose a false interpretation. A similar falsification of events before and in 1971 caused the creation of Bangladesh. But, they will conclude all were conspiracy by the Hindus and India.

Dude. Where did you find this gem of piece that Pakistan refused to take Hyderabad in because of word ‘H’ not in it ? It is mind blowing to see that how bengalis are writing history these days.

 

[bluesky]

Dude. Where did you find this gem of piece that Pakistan refused to take Hyderabad in because of word ‘H’ not in it ? It is mind blowing to see that how bengalis are writing history these days.

Oh!! I made a mistake. But, then why should you include Hyderabad in Pakistan when even the acronym H is absent in the name, PAKISTAN? Was it not the reason that you did not want Bengal to be included in PAKISTAN, because B is not present there? This is what almost all your guys are telling in every other post. But, let us hear from your side of (hi)story about the struggle the present Pakistani people did to create Pakistan.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Dude. Where did you find this gem of piece that Pakistan refused to take Hyderabad in because of word ‘H’ not in it ? It is mind blowing to see that how bengalis are writing history these days.

It is actually you, Pakistanis who propagate the theory that Bengal was not Pakistan. It was an ''extra'' addition with the ''real'' Pakistan because 'B' is not in the country's name.I have come across many Pakistani posts which give reasoning in that way.If this the case then Hyderabad or any other potential muslim states are also ineligible to become ''real'' Pakistan.If Gujarat was a mulsim state which is contiguous with Pakistan also could not become the ''real'' Pakistan as there is no 'G' in the name, nor it can be included without damaging the vary name of P A K I S T A N.

 

[Al-zakir]

Not actually. Crux of the problem is, some Pakistani has a very patronizing attitude towards Bengali people and has a sense of superiority/inferiority complex and tendency to abuse in slightest provocation.

Because Bengali nationalist in love with Indian.

Pakistani knows the difference between bangali nationalists and Bangladeshi Muslim.

They treat Muslims like their own but hate Tagore loving Indian dalal.

I don’t see any problem with it.

It is only because the word PAKISTAN had no 'B'.

Pakistan means land of pure.

 

[Doctor Strange]

It is also true that the Pakistanis did not intentionally include Hyderabad of Nizam, only because the acronym 'H' is not in the word, PAKISTAN. Some Pakistani PDF members love to talk forcefully and try to impose a false interpretation. A similar falsification of events before and in 1971 caused the creation of Bangladesh. But, they will conclude all were conspiracy by the Hindus and India.

North West areas of that region that time was known as PAKISTAN its true, Assam-Bengal joining with them was also named Pakistan. Whatever Muslim land they could gather that time was under Pakistan demand. But I think something hidden was going on behind the scene. Otherwise its beyond me why Muslim league members from around the corners of India were bickering for Pakistan, knowing their lands are not included in Pakistan demand. Where those north west regions werent that interested themselves. And in final days without consulting Bengal Muslim league leaders, parts of Bengal and Assam right was handed over to india. They were in such a haste. And after independence of Pakistan, they did all to alienate Bengal. Im convinced there was something going on behind the scene, knowing the strategic importance of Pakistan still. Bengal was fooled as rest of india. Now we should find better ways to find how to best to avoid each others common history, keeping good relation. Its good they are drawing their own identity and BD should also keep on drawing its suitable identity.

 

[Green Arrow]

Oh!! I made a mistake. But, then why should you include Hyderabad in Pakistan when even the acronym H is absent in the name, PAKISTAN? Was it not the reason that you did not want Bengal to be included in PAKISTAN, because B is not present there? This is what almost all your guys are telling in every other post. But, let us hear from your side of (hi)story about the struggle the present Pakistani people did to create Pakistan.

You only accepted the mistake when pointed and if I start following what others are saying that whole BD is Indian colony as Delhi her capital but obiviously I know that is not the case. If you can back up your stupid post about word B then it is fine other please keep your mouth shut. No one denies the role which bengalis played in creation of Pakistan but that does not mean that it was only Bengalis who made Pakistan. Regards

 

[bluesky]

You only accepted the mistake when pointed and if I start following what others are saying that whole BD is Indian colony as Delhi her capital but obiviously I know that is not the case.

Who can stop a man from talking lies in an open forum? You see, Delhi has very kindly given us permission to buy weapons from China, a Delhi foe. So, you may be correct. Better, study something on geopolitics. You guys did not understand this in 1971.

 

[UKBengali]

Because Bengali nationalist in love with Indian.

Pakistani knows the difference between bangali nationalists and Bangladeshi Muslim.

They treat Muslims like their own but hate Tagore loving Indian dalal.

I don’t see any problem with it.

Is that why during 1947-1971 there was massive economic and political discrimination against BD?