Army gives government 48 hour ultimatum: Shujat

[VCheng]

The option he's looking for is 'Is American good for Pakistan'

Apparently, USA is trying to keep things constitutional, as they should be, but that is not accpetable to IK either:


US meddling in Pakistan's politics, says Imran Khan - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: In round two of his speech on Thursday, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in a message to the United States government said it is interfering with Pakistan’s internal politics and should withdraw its statements regarding the ongoing political crisis.

The US State Department today in a statement lent support to Nawaz Sharif’s government, saying the “elected government is in place”.

Imran, however, said the government is a “servant of the US” that “polishes the shoes of the Americans”.

He said that he is familiar with the workings of the American and British democratic systems and said that the US would never accept a rigged election.

“If an election took place in the US and a Congressman said that a majority of the votes could not be verified, wouldn't that constitute a full blown enquiry in America?” he asked.

Imran appealed to US ambassador Richard Olsen to convey his message to the State Department, and asked “if Pakistanis are children of a lesser god”.

“Why one law for us and another for you? Why are our democracies different?”

Urging Olsen to take back the statements of the US government, Imran said Nawaz is hiding behind the army and the US to protect his rigged election.

Thursday marked the eighth day of the Imran Khan-led movement against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, a campaign that has partially paralysed life in the twin cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi as containers and police personnel guard state buildings against charged protesters.

Although Imran is unflinching in his demand for the premier's resignation, PTI sources say the party chairman has "no other option left" as his earlier calls for a civil disobedience movement and the mass resignation of PTI lawmakers from assemblies have yielded no results.

Imran rallied supporters with the aim to remove Nawaz as prime minister in protest of alleged rigging in the 2013 general elections. Journalists present in D-chowk — the final destination of the PTI sit-in — say that crowds are thinning as the drawn-out protest enters its eighth day.

 

[SekrutYakhni]

Apparently, USA is trying to keep things constitutional, as they should be, but that is not accpetable to IK either:


US meddling in Pakistan's politics, says Imran Khan - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: In round two of his speech on Thursday, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in a message to the United States government said it is interfering with Pakistan’s internal politics and should withdraw its statements regarding the ongoing political crisis.

The US State Department today in a statement lent support to Nawaz Sharif’s government, saying the “elected government is in place”.

Imran, however, said the government is a “servant of the US” that “polishes the shoes of the Americans”.

He said that he is familiar with the workings of the American and British democratic systems and said that the US would never accept a rigged election.

“If an election took place in the US and a Congressman said that a majority of the votes could not be verified, wouldn't that constitute a full blown enquiry in America?” he asked.

Imran appealed to US ambassador Richard Olsen to convey his message to the State Department, and asked “if Pakistanis are children of a lesser god”.

“Why one law for us and another for you? Why are our democracies different?”

Urging Olsen to take back the statements of the US government, Imran said Nawaz is hiding behind the army and the US to protect his rigged election.

Thursday marked the eighth day of the Imran Khan-led movement against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, a campaign that has partially paralysed life in the twin cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi as containers and police personnel guard state buildings against charged protesters.

Although Imran is unflinching in his demand for the premier's resignation, PTI sources say the party chairman has "no other option left" as his earlier calls for a civil disobedience movement and the mass resignation of PTI lawmakers from assemblies have yielded no results.

Imran rallied supporters with the aim to remove Nawaz as prime minister in protest of alleged rigging in the 2013 general elections. Journalists present in D-chowk — the final destination of the PTI sit-in — say that crowds are thinning as the drawn-out protest enters its eighth day.

Printing money babe believes in democracy. Printing money babe should understand rigged elections is not a democracy. But why would the babe accept it? Tind S is her man down here.

Rigged elections are illegal in the constitution.

 

[Counter-Errorist]

Apparently, USA is trying to keep things constitutional, as they should be, but that is not accpetable to IK either:


US meddling in Pakistan's politics, says Imran Khan - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: In round two of his speech on Thursday, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in a message to the United States government said it is interfering with Pakistan’s internal politics and should withdraw its statements regarding the ongoing political crisis.

The US State Department today in a statement lent support to Nawaz Sharif’s government, saying the “elected government is in place”.

Imran, however, said the government is a “servant of the US” that “polishes the shoes of the Americans”.

He said that he is familiar with the workings of the American and British democratic systems and said that the US would never accept a rigged election.

“If an election took place in the US and a Congressman said that a majority of the votes could not be verified, wouldn't that constitute a full blown enquiry in America?” he asked.

Imran appealed to US ambassador Richard Olsen to convey his message to the State Department, and asked “if Pakistanis are children of a lesser god”.

“Why one law for us and another for you? Why are our democracies different?”

Urging Olsen to take back the statements of the US government, Imran said Nawaz is hiding behind the army and the US to protect his rigged election.

Thursday marked the eighth day of the Imran Khan-led movement against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, a campaign that has partially paralysed life in the twin cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi as containers and police personnel guard state buildings against charged protesters.

Although Imran is unflinching in his demand for the premier's resignation, PTI sources say the party chairman has "no other option left" as his earlier calls for a civil disobedience movement and the mass resignation of PTI lawmakers from assemblies have yielded no results.

Imran rallied supporters with the aim to remove Nawaz as prime minister in protest of alleged rigging in the 2013 general elections. Journalists present in D-chowk — the final destination of the PTI sit-in — say that crowds are thinning as the drawn-out protest enters its eighth day.

Here's something you utterly fail to see. That US needs to keep things 'constitutional' in its own country. That we're not really interested to hear what the US has to advise us.

You behave like the US is the very essence of moral supremacy. That her very existence is for the betterment of the human race. And that we all should just bow down to it and accept her will and form of governance upon us.

 

[VCheng]

Here's something you utterly fail to see. That US needs to keep things 'constitutional' in its own country. That we're not really interested to hear what the US has to advise us.

You behave like the US is the very essence of moral supremacy. That her very existence is for the betterment of the human race. And that we all should just bow down to it and accept her will and form of governance upon us.

So if what USA says is not correct for rule of law within Pakistan, then why is IK making such a big deal out of it? What the US ambassador in the context of this thread (without going off topic), said is sound advice, it seems.

 

[Counter-Errorist]

then why is IK making such a big deal out of it?

Because they're interfering with our internal affairs?

What the US ambassador in the context of this thread (without going off topic), said is sound advice, it seems.

It's sound advice to those who want to hear it. An outrageous claim to those who don't. Besides, the fact that they're attempting to 'advise' us should be enough evidence of their intereference.

 

[VCheng]

Because they're interfering with our internal affairs?


It's sound advice to those who want to hear it. An outrageous claim to those who don't. Besides, the fact that they're attempting to 'advise' us should be enough evidence of their intereference.

Not really. If there is a coup or anything else unconstitutional in Pakistan, it will place in jeopardy the mechanisms of delivering billions of dollars in military and other aid to Pakistan, given the way Congress does things. That makes it an important bilateral matter, of concern to both countries. And that is perfectly within the purview of the US ambassador and what he said.

 

[Counter-Errorist]

Not really. If there is a coup or anything else unconstitutional in Pakistan, it will place in jeopardy the mechanisms of delivering billions of dollars in military and other aid to Pakistan, given the way Congress does things. That makes it an important bilateral matter, of concern to both countries. And that is perfectly within the purview of the US ambassador and what he said.

When has a coup in Pakistan jeopardized military aid?

 

[VCheng]

When has a coup in Pakistan jeopardized military aid?

Does Pakistan wish to test that theory now? "Past history is no guarantee of future results." What the US Ambassador said is quite relevant.

 

[Counter-Errorist]

Does Pakistan wish to test that theory now? "Past history is no guarantee of future results." What the US Ambassador said is quite relevant.

We don't care. We're better off without it anyway.

 

[VCheng]

We don't care. We're better off without it anyway.

Let's see what the "angels" decide just how important US support is.

 

[Informant]

Trust me if Army were backing it completely Noora would be off to KSA. That is not the case, this chota chuchunder is just trying to have his voice heard.

 

[Counter-Errorist]

Let's see what the "angels" decide just how important US support is.

Pass it on man, whatever you've been smoking. I wanna know whats it like seeing angels everywhere.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Yara, for once, let us know, what actually is "good for Pakistan".............. what I don't get with you is, everything is either bad or worse with/for Pakistan.

Be clear:

1. Is PMLN good for Pakistan
2. Is PPP good for Pakistan.
3. Is JI good for Pakistan.
4. Is Maulana Diesel good for Pakistan.
5. Is PTI good for Pakistan.
6. Is TuQ good for Pakistan.
7. Are 'angels' good for Pakistan.

Or any combination of the above. Once you let us know, then we can proceed from there. Until then, you better keep your peace with America, and The American Way of Life.

Hahaha .. Good luck getting a straight answer from Gen Cheng the new born American..

 

[Crypto]

No where in the video he said anything about 48 hour ultimatum. Sensation much ???

Insurgencies wont spark if another election is called. PMLN cannot do a Jalsa without patwaris, you expect people to fight for them, that too against the country. Talk to your weed dealer, he's giving you something very strong.

Can you forward me dealers details too ;p

 

[Kompromat]

No where in the video he said anything about 48 hour ultimatum. Sensation much ???


Can you forward me dealers details too ;p

I will be coming to W.A soon, will hand you in myself.