What's new

Arabs must accept Jerusalem’s status

Similarly Israel/ Jerusalem is controlled and governed by Iserali govt and people must accept this fact . reality

You can accept the same and stay to believe as such but you cannot force your belief upon others. For people, that holds a different reality and occupation does not count as real ownership. You had your point of view then let others express as well.

Regards,
 
I have a working solution for Jerusalem Israel and the whole middle east...

We dig out Hitler... rebuild the Wehrmacht...let them run riot and turn the whole middle east into a slaugtherhous were jews sunni shia get everyday the same assfucking...so long till all people in the middle east stop hateing each other and work together to get rid of the Nazis devils...

Slowly I belive this is the only cure that would end this pointless stupid hate there... not only muslims vs jews but also muslims vs muslims...

Germany overcome the NAZI passed once we can do it twice... in the name of peace
 
What a humiliation for the US and Israel. No one willing to join the bandwagon.
 
"You". The Arabs illegally kicked nearly all the peaceable Jews out of their territories while Israel allowed those Muslims not in active revolt to remain and then some. With these facts and by your logic what "ethnic cleansing" are you supporting here, that of the Arabs kicking out their Jews, or are you encouraging the Jews to kick out revolting Arabs?

Very disingenuous argument and, as intelligent as you are, you should not be fooling others, let alone yourself. And your argument is actually implicitly charitable toward Arabs: That the Jews, who lived among Arabs for hundreds/thousands of years were being 'kicked out' on and after the Balfour Deceleration itself shows that the Jews were fairly tolerated in the Arab world (heck, even in modern Iran) unlike their existence in the Christendom. And this also begs a question: Why kick out now? Because it as a REACTION to a threat--which did materialize. Plus, unlike Palestinians who resisted the European Jews coming to take up their land, the Jews of the Middle East WILLINGLY migrated to Israel--and wisely so. And they are STILL doing it even from prosperous countries--is that 'ethnic cleansing' being done?!
 
Very disingenuous argument and, as intelligent as you are, you should not be fooling others, let alone yourself. And your argument is actually implicitly charitable toward Arabs: That the Jews, who lived among Arabs for hundreds/thousands of years were being 'kicked out' on and after the Balfour Deceleration itself shows that the Jews were fairly tolerated in the Arab world (heck, even in modern Iran) unlike their existence in the Christendom. And this also begs a question: Why kick out now? Because it as a REACTION to a threat--which did materialize.
Kicking-out-the-Jews-by-Arab-leaders started as soon as the Ottomans left, long before 1948. And what you are attempting to justify is the robbery and expulsion of people innocent of any crime, solely on the basis of being Jews, not on their actions - very different from the situation of the Arabs in Palestine.

...the Jews of the Middle East WILLINGLY migrated to Israel--and wisely so.
A great deal of it was involuntary: Jews robbed of property and savings in Iraq, forced to "voluntarily" give up their property in Egypt (a trick later employed by the Egyptian military against the Brotherhood), and so on.

Part of the motivation was simple robbery. But the other purpose of kicking 800,000+ Jews into a nation of only 550,000 people in a space of only a few years was to starve the little state to death through poverty and dearth of food. It was a difficult few years for Israel. The Arab trade embargo against Jews was felt sharply and new arrivals were often dumped into the recently-abandoned Arab villages (whose former inhabitants were being fed and housed courtesy of the UNRWA, while the Jews got nothing), given a cow and seed and tools, and other than protection courtesy of the Israeli army given very little else, even if they had been big-time businessmen in their former countries.

My point? You're supporting thieves, robbers, and murderers. For fun. Justice would require that you ally with the Jews of Israel instead.
 
Kicking-out-the-Jews-by-Arab-leaders started as soon as the Ottomans left, long before 1948. And what you are attempting to justify is the robbery and expulsion of people innocent of any crime, solely on the basis of being Jews, not on their actions - very different from the situation of the Arabs in Palestine.

A great deal of it was involuntary: Jews robbed of property and savings in Iraq, forced to "voluntarily" give up their property in Egypt (a trick later employed by the Egyptian military against the Brotherhood), and so on.

Part of the motivation was simple robbery. But the other purpose of kicking 800,000+ Jews into a nation of only 550,000 people in a space of only a few years was to starve the little state to death through poverty and dearth of food. It was a difficult few years for Israel. The Arab trade embargo against Jews was felt sharply and new arrivals were often dumped into the recently-abandoned Arab villages (whose former inhabitants were being fed and housed courtesy of the UNRWA, while the Jews got nothing), given a cow and seed and tools, and other than protection courtesy of the Israeli army given very little else, even if they had been big-time businessmen in their former countries.

My point? You're supporting thieves, robbers, and murderers. For fun. Justice would require that you ally with the Jews of Israel instead.
Bullshit. Jews are free to go anywhere they want.

They went to Israel with their own choice.

If Jews don't like living in Muslim countries, the Jews are free to leave then.
 
Instead of saying that "Arabs" must accept Jerusalem's status as including the capital of Israel, one should say that "Muslims" must accept this. Because, what underlies rejection of Israeli control of a part of Jerusalem is Muslim arrogance. Muslims believe that once they have conquered a place they can never, ever accept that people of any other faith might come to control that place instead. This concept of Muslim absolute supremacy over all other peoples of all other faiths is what must be given up by Muslims.
 
Instead of saying that "Arabs" must accept Jerusalem's status as including the capital of Israel, one should say that "Muslims" must accept this. Because what underlies rejection of Israeli control of a part of Jerusalem is Muslim arrogance. Muslims believe that once they have conquered a place they can never, ever accept that people of any other faith might come to control that place instead. This concept of Muslim absolute supremacy over all other peoples of all other faiths is what must be given up by Muslims.
lol talk about arrogance. It is Israeli arrogance that they think they own Jerusalem, even though it is against international law for Jerusalem to be under Israeli sovereignty.

Please don't talk bullshit here you will be caught!
 
lol talk about arrogance. It is Israeli arrogance that they think they own Jerusalem, even though it is against international law for Jerusalem to be under Israeli sovereignty.

Please don't talk bullshit here you will be caught!

You don't even believe or accept "international" law. You only accept "Allah's" law. And THAT is the source of your arrogance.
 
Hahaha, Arabs have accepted and are party to this decision. Rest is just drama. Some people just dont wanna open their eyes.:lol:
 
You can accept the same and stay to believe as such but you cannot force your belief upon others. For people, that holds a different reality and occupation does not count as real ownership. You had your point of view then let others express as well.
Regards,
Remember, it's not just that "occupation does not count as real ownership." It's that fair purchase and gift doesn't count either: a Jew who purchased land from an Arab is considered as much of an evil "occupier" as if he had slain the family and built a castle upon their remains.

Because it's not the land that matters, but that the Jews have sovereignty over it, yes?
 
Hahaha, Arabs have accepted and are party to this decision. Rest is just drama. Some people just dont wanna open their eyes.:lol:
There are many Arabs who are against the Jerusalem being Israel's capital like Saudi Arabia.

but ofcourse @Solomon2 supports Jerusalem being Israel's capital. lol :lol:
 
learn to accept the change, learn to accept reality

Israel is reality, that piece of land in controlled and governed by Israeli government since decades,

Why world didn't accept the reality of hitler? Answer me.

It is not only Muslims who are protesting and didn't like the move but others as well...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/us/trump-jerusalem-jews.html
https://www.timesofisrael.com/egypts-coptic-pope-rejects-pence-meeting-over-jerusalem/

I donot see Christians protesting for Constantinople (Istanbul) and asking Turks to return the same to Vatican,
I donot see Mongols protesting for Central China and asking them to return the same,

Jerusalem in Israel is reality!!!!!

Christians are not protesting for Istanbul because WHOLE WORLD recognizes Turks control over it...
Muslims are not protesting for SPAIN where they ruled for centuries because WHOLE WORLD recognizes Spanish (Christians) control over it., including Muslims.

Jerusalem has been lived in by Jews, Christians and Muslims alike...It can't be subjugated to one party alone - a stance whole world acknowledges.

May be Jerusalem in Israel is reality but the whole world also don't recognize it...That's a reality as well.

Sucking other's territory inch by inch and displacing locals will not get you world's support but condemnation.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom