My point was specific to the two sets of figures which don't seem to square off well. Secondly, we are now told that around $ 200 million is cheap & that is supposedly the cost being paid by the French. What does that make the original MMRCA deal worth then? $25-30 billion? We have discussed this before, it was a bad deal then & remains so now. This is essentially a political decision, Funny that the UPA government had told the Americans that this was purely technical, not political, so they couldn't get in. Now we are back to a political call whether or not this government had a choice or not after the goof up before.
The figures without any details do not mean much. Its only fodder for more speculation.
The Original MMRCA deal was clearly an impossible choice for the govt. which is why it had to be re-looked and renegotiated. Again the actual values remain in the shadows, we can only make intelligent guesses based on circumstantial evidence provided in news reports.
The reasons for rejecting American goodies still remain and is unlikely to go away any time soon. So its pointless to discuss its future.
The only real choice was between Rafale and EuroFighter (as per Plan A). Of the two Rafale was reported to be cheaper, not to mention it had only one nation's strings attached to it.
Eurofighter was re-offered to us 20% cheaper, Rafale was negotiated at 25% cheaper. So it was really the only practical option.
However the exorbitant cost has ensured that only a much smaller number will make it to the IAF. IAF will just have to grow up and support LCA and AMCA to make up for the short falls.
LIVEFIST: GE Statement: F414-powered LCA’s Mission Superiority Enhanced With Indian Expertise
@ Nityam Reading your posts, you have hardly given any facts or a rationale for your points, have instead chosen to be personal and in bad taste. While it is your wish how you want to be, my suggestion is to not get personal or fanatical, present your points with proofs from open sources, or justify them with rationales, in case you want to be taken seriously. And on one more point of you trying to laugh at former air chief knowing less than the DM, bro, if you have been in the services, you will realize that there are capabilities with us that the DM is not aware of. There are few sections of the armed forces which report directly to the PM, and no one else. And sometimes it may happen that a colonel knows about something and the Chief is not aware of that at all. Indian security establishment is very well segregated and is compartmentalized. Just for your info
I find calling a spade a spade in good taste and form. Everything I have said is backed by rational and facts. Too bad you cannot understand them.
Are you seriously saying that the DM is not aware of the capabilities of our forces or that the forces keep secrets from the DM ?
Now take you own advice and provide proof from open sources if want to be taken seriously.
In any case, how is a certain exceptions in the rules relevant to the debate at hand ? You appear to suggest that the IAF has secretes needs for MMRCA which is Known only to the PM and not to the DM. All I can say is LOL.