FOOLS_NIGHTMARE
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Messages
- 18,063
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. It is a disputed territory for both. However, In 1965 there was peace prevailing and there was no requirement to unnecessary disturb that. In the assessment of PA, India was in weak position after 1962 loss to China and PA tried to make good of that.My point was that Kashmir was an open ground for both sides (Read disputed) while Lahore was not a disputed territory by any means hence the difference between the two.
Pakistan did not initiate hostilities on IB when India did op Meghdot. The point here is simple that India attacked the non disputed territory in 1965 while Pakistan had attacked a disputed territory earlier.Yes. It is a disputed territory for both. However, In 1965 there was peace prevailing and there was no requirement to unnecessary disturb that. In the assessment of PA, India was in weak position after 1962 loss to China and PA tried to make good of that.
This assessment proved to be grossly incorrect.
Moreover, both countries consider part of Kashmir under their control to be an integral part of their country. Any attack on that is considered an attack on the nation and can be defended with all the means available. That’s what India did. I am sure Pakistan would also do the same if India attacks Kashmir under Pakistan control.
Pakistan should have factored-in these aspects before starting a war. Which they didn’t.
One attacks his neighbour’s home to evict him and ends up defending one’s own home. And then starts celebrating successful defence of own home. Would that be a victory to celebrate?
Pakistan launched an operation in a disputed territory vs India launched attack at IB in 1965. There is truth to why we call it defense day.
No one’s saint out here in this bad world.Pakistan did not initiate hostilities on IB when India did op Meghdot. The point here is simple that India attacked the non disputed territory in 1965 while Pakistan had attacked a disputed territory earlier.
In south Asia, defense is considered supreme hence the celebration of the victory more like how Indian side celebrates Atal Asar battle.
Im not an Ahmadi,Despite being classed as non-Muslims under Pakistani Law, you would be hard pressed to find an Ahmadi in the UK who does not identify themselves as . Besides, it’s doubtful an ex-COAS or any high-ranking official involved in this “saazish” against PTI who professes the Ahmadi faith would need to resort to exercising their Asylum-seeking benefits to settle abroad.
I would also vouch that Ahmadis are by and large PTI supporters/voters. For Pakistanis of all colours and creeds to untie against corruption and sovereignty is the need of the hour.
I will also be at your side and so will many others.I’ll be right by your side, brother.
My God, literally everything you accused Pakistan of doing (changing the narrative and so on) literally applies to India.No one’s saint out here in this bad world.
Pakistan wanted Kashmir. They thought that they had an opportunity. Tried and failed.
Pakistan did what they wanted to do. India responded the way it thought was fit.
Pakistan couldn’t achieve it‘s objective. Nothing wrong with that. The problem is, trying to create a narrative that’s completely false.
1965, 1971, 1999. There is no letup on creating a new history. Piece by piece.
Gen Bajwa has started a fresh attempt on 1971.
Blaming it on politicians. Not saying who the politicians were. Very soon 1971 will become a grand victory.
Oddly enough - with 65 much as with Kargil - it came down to a few leadership levels(including Bhutto who proposed the idea) that made up Op Gibraltar without considering the actual situation on the ground.No one’s saint out here in this bad world.
Pakistan wanted Kashmir. They thought that they had an opportunity. Tried and failed.
Pakistan did what they wanted to do. India responded the way it thought was fit.
Pakistan couldn’t achieve it‘s objective. Nothing wrong with that. The problem is, trying to create a narrative that’s completely false.
1965, 1971, 1999. There is no letup on creating a new history. Piece by piece.
Gen Bajwa has started a fresh attempt on 1971.
Blaming it on politicians. Not saying who the politicians were. Very soon 1971 will become a grand victory.
Thanks bastard Bajwa even Indian dogs can bark at us now.Northern Army Commander Lt General Upendra Dwivedi on Tuesday said the Indian Army is ready to execute orders like taking back Azad Kashmir.
Photo for representation
"As far as the Indian Army is concerned, it will carry out any order given by the Government of India. Whenever such orders are given, we will always be ready for it," said Lt Gen Upendra Dwivedi, Northern Army Commander, on the Defence Minister's statement of taking back Azad Kashmir.
"The military is always ready to make sure that ceasefire understanding is never broken as it is in the interest of both nations, but if broken at any time, we will give them a befitting reply," said Dwivedi, Northern Army Commander on the ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan.
"The country has over 50 per cent of people below the age of 25. If we take them in as Agniveers, teach them and send them back, we will absorb some, others by paramilitary, and police forces and the remaining can be self-employed," he stated.
"We have almost 160 terrorists sitting at the launchpad of which there are 130 north of Pir Panjal and 30 south of Pir Panjal. As for the complete hinterland, a total of 82 Pakistani terrorists and 53 local terrorists are there," he further stated.
Earlier on October 28, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh reiterated New Delhi's resolve to take back Azad Kashmir, saying all refugees would get their land and homes back.