What's new

Will Indian Army shoot its own people?

Will Indian army shot its own people?


  • Total voters
    50
we put the pashtun in his place which you hindus failed to do for a thousand years .And then came along the hindu dogras who destroyed the sikh empire by selling out the khalsa to the british .

But still what the russians did to the pashtuns ,man that was something.Soviets would have won had it been not for the weakling Gorbachev.

How you put the Pashtun in his place? Or the Pashtun put you in your place :confused:

And look at the Sovets after stepping in Afghanistan, broke into hundred pieces :lol:
 
You have our jugular vein, and we have grabbed you by the balls with our nukes.

We're just asking for you to try something.

It doesn't seem like,whatever you are describing.

Even your cocky,crazy drunk generals have the balls to do what you are saying.
 
Eh... I sympathize with the Mughals after Aurangzeb died...
All of Aurangzebs offsprings had Hindu blood.
So you can tell how much I care.

And Pashtun were never butchered... It was Sikhs which were butchered in Peshawar and along with British at the BIGGEST embarassment for British in the world
didn't you write in a previous post that you are the descendant of some higher caste Hindu convert!so why so much anger on the Hindu community when you yourself have some hindu blood running in your vein!are you ashamed of your ancestors?
 
we put the pashtun in his place which you hindus failed to do for a thousand years .And then came along the hindu dogras who destroyed the sikh empire by selling out the khalsa to the british .

But still what the russians did to the pashtuns ,man that was something.Soviets would have won had it been not for the weakling Gorbachev.

He was a Muslim, Pashtuns looted their homes after the invasion of October 1947.
 
That's a letter to the editor by some separatist. Please provide some encyclopedia or some report to prove your claim of Sikhs being discriminated.

http://www.sikhreview.org/pdf/may2001/pdf-files/perspective.pdf

from 30% to 7%.As above


Sikhs being discriminated.

Congressional Record, V. 151, PT. 17, October 7 to 26, 2005 - Google Books


in the past till 1995 ,we were discriminated.After BJP came in power ,things changed.my posts are not on discrimination.
 
didn't you write in a previous post that you are the descendant of some higher caste Hindu convert!so why so much anger on the Hindu community when you yourself have some hindu blood running in your vein!are you ashamed of your ancestors?

Good question, but I dont have Hindu mother or grandfather like Aurangzeb sons :)
 
Even the British government considered the Sikhs a separate nation. In the 1940’s the British Parliament declared unequivocally that after the British quit India, there are three distinct peoples, i.e. Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims who are the legitimate heirs to the sovereignty of India, and whatever these three “nations” agree to, the British will accept their decision before they quit India. But the Indian government always mistrusted them and exploited them. On 10th October 1947, less than two months of India’s independence a secret circular by the Punjab Governor, Sir Chandu Lal Trivedi, declared that Sikhs are a criminal tribe and threat to peace and that the activities of Sikhs should be kept under watch.

Nehru and Gandhi, urging the Sikhs to join India, made a commitment that no constitution of India would be framed unless it was acceptable to the Sikhs. Even the Indian constitution farmed and adopted in 1950, did not recognize Sikhs as a separate identity and considers them Hindus with long hair. Due to this the Sikh representatives had rejected and refused to give their assent to it. In 2005 the Indian Supreme Court, said, “ if the argument for recognising every religious group within the broad Hindu religion as separate religious minority was accepted and such tendencies were encouraged, ‘the whole country, which is already under class and social conflicts due to various divisive forces, will further face divisions on the basis of religious diversities. A claim by one group of citizens would lead to a similar claim by another group and conflict and strife would ensue.”

The Indian government tried to undermine Punjabi, the language of Sikhs, several times. In 1951 census Hindi was preferred over Punjabi. The ruling Congress party issued an advertisement in newspapers asking non-Sikh residents of Punjab to return to Hindi as their mother tongue, even though Punjabi had been their mother tongue since ages. Almost all the Punjabi speaking Hindus declared Hindi as their mother tongue during the census of India in 1951 and 1961. Similarly, the Congress government even opposed the formation of Punjabi State in total contrast to the commitment to demarcate India on a linguistic basis made by the Congress party in 1929, 1946 and 1947
Sikhism in Jeopardy (In India)*|*Sikh Siyasat News (in English)

On 10th October 1947, less than two months of India’s independence a secret circular by the Punjab Governor, Sir Chandu Lal Trivedi, declared that Sikhs are a criminal tribe and threat to peace and that the activities of Sikhs should be kept under watch.
 
we put the pashtun in his place which you hindus failed to do for a thousand years .And then came along the hindu dogras who destroyed the sikh empire by selling out the khalsa to the british .

But still what the russians did to the pashtuns ,man that was something.Soviets would have won had it been not for the weakling Gorbachev.

I agree with your call on the Hindu Dogras but it is unfair to blame so many people for the decision of a few nobility.

How you put the Pashtun in his place? Or the Pashtun put you in your place :confused:

And look at the Sovets after stepping in Afghanistan, broke into hundred pieces :lol:

So did your Lohar make the Stingers,then?
 
How you put the Pashtun in his place? Or the Pashtun put you in your place :confused:

And look at the Sovets after stepping in Afghanistan, broke into hundred pieces :lol:

And as if pashtuns are eating chicken and drinking beer.......All those 100 pieces are indivisually better than pashtun areas and i don't get it why do ppl celebrate when they have lost the max.I am no pashtun basher but ppl ought to realize that war is **** for everyone but especially the weaker side which was pashtuns in russian invasion and usa invasion.Their 2-3 generations are already lost and u claim they have won??God help you man,instead of focussing on education etc they are joining taliban ranks and if this keeps on happening they are bound to be bombed to stone age.

Pakistan must understand that its the era of technology and not manpower and pashtuns have none so they better focus on themselves than fighting useless jihads
 
How you put the Pashtun in his place? Or the Pashtun put you in your place :confused:

And look at the Sovets after stepping in Afghanistan, broke into hundred pieces :lol:

So why did pashtun lose kashmir and peshawar to us? Why did their women marry us?

and pashtuns lost 1.5 million to soviet forces today ,the pashtuns are starving and working as prostitutes in peshawar. Most of them regret fighting ussr for pakistani punjabi who are like brahmins according to them.

Had the soviets used mustard gas like they did in xinjiang the insurgency would have been crushed in 1.5 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom