Why Indians generally hate Aam Aadmi Party and Kejriwal?

[Guynextdoor2]

U understood my point. Thats why I am saying that AAP's win will not be a setback for BJP in other states as there is no AAP in other states and the regional parties are in no match to Modi ideologically.

Thats why I say, give AAP 10 years and let it spread thruout India. Then we can talk bout opposition and threat to Modi.

We will have to see. I think the effort to remain in Delhi was a spectacular one. How fast to spread will have to be decided by them. I think they'll fight next Lok Sabha and will have created an organization to fight it. If they decide to not spread that fast, that's all right too I guess.

 

[Stephen Cohen]

@Guynextdoor2

The BJP was decimated by the CORRUPTION in Municipal Corporation of Delhi
which was controlled by it along with the infighting in the state unit
and outsider CM like Kiran Bedi

 

[Norwegian]

Thats not how u do in democracy. Walking out mean imposing another election which means burden on common man as money and governance take a hit.

He walked out because opposition was pro-corruption. He is a man of principles not money.

 

[WAR-rior]

Unchecked capitalism is in fact part of the problem. They say India has world's third most billionaires. What good are they if the economic growth didn't benefit Indian majority but a tiny class?

Thats true. Coz govt vehicles are inefficient. Capitalists do their job by earning money. Then they fill govt treasury in forms of taxes and donations. Now its govt's onus how it spends that money on common man. Capitalists shudnt be blamed for govt's inefficiencies.

Its there are no capitalists, who will earn money for the govt?

 

[zip]

I think that negativity is because of LS poll where public was very angry due to corruption charges on congress govt ..Their only possible alternative was a bjp led govt ..Kejriwal needed to sit in fence and watch the show but he did oppositte to that ..without any real platform he jumped to general election accusing everyone in the process ..Contested against modi ..All these hyperactivity without providing alternative infuriated many people and he lost badly ..His party image would have been better through out India if he waited for his time without jumping in to each and every contest ..Having said that his aggressive nature has contributed to whatever he got till now ..

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Thats not how u do in democracy. Walking out mean imposing another election which means burden on common man as money and governance take a hit.

There is now evidence that walking out has proved an asset to him and not a liability. Only people outside Delhi seem to be complaining. People of Delhi seem to have been fine with it and were waiting for him to come back with a majority.

 

[WAR-rior]

He walked out because opposition was pro-corruption. He is a man of principles not money.

Ha Ha. He walked out coz opposition was pro corruption?

But he made govt with support of most corrupt.

How do u explain that?

 

[Stephen Cohen]

I feel SORRY for Kiran Bedi

She has a much better RESUME than Kejriwal ; along with much more experience

It is BJP's defeat ; not her's

 

[SrNair]

We dont hate him. We simply dont trust his socialists ideology. India is a hughely than huge populated country. To give good lives to people we not only need corruptionfree country but also simultaneous growth to the nation. Socialism as a theory dont talk bout growth but equal distribution. We can never bring poor out of poverty till we dont have double digit growth.

We believe in Modi coz hes not corrupt. We believe in Modi coz hes pro development and growth. We believe in Modi coz he believes in job creation.

Now this election result of delhi is a mandate against Congress and in favor of AAP and this is proved by the shift in vote percentages. BJP vote is entact. All congress vote went to AAP.

Now point is, why BJP vote didnt increase? Its coz of their local leadership.All the State elections fought in Modi's name were successful only where there was no notable state leadership. So people had no notions bout them and hence voted for BJP in Modi's name.

In Delhi, BJP leaders are very infamous. In 2013 they won on Modi wave, not on the credability of their work.

Some reason, BJP shifted its strategy in last moments but fact remains that people were determined to not vote BJP.

Again, its a lesson for u. Democracy in India is federal in nature. National issues are different from local issues. People of this country still love and trust Modi but his local leaders had earned so much infame in their name that even Modi wasnt able to do anything, that too against a party like AAP who gave an alternative to Congress.

Even Kejiriwal.used PM picture in his website to gathering the votes.

 

[Norwegian]

Its there are no capitalists, who will earn money for the govt?

Through direct and indirect taxation. Capitalism in US failed after the super rich elite got their way of avoiding direct taxation since Reaganomics!

 

[WAR-rior]

There is now evidence that walking out has proved an asset to him and not a liability. Only people outside Delhi seem to be complaining. People of Delhi seem to have been fine with it and were waiting for him to come back with a majority.

Its all bout how u see. Kejru won not coz of his 49 days. He won coz there was no Congress. All congress votes went to AAP. This itself was enough for AAP to win this way.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Wave, Meet Tsunami: Uddhav Thackeray's Takedown of PM Narendra Modi

 

[NKVD]

I am sure,in the near future you will regret voting for BJP and will join the kejrival clud,InshAllah

Thats not happening because his term is Ending on 2020 and Next LS Elections is in 2019.He has to Became bhagoda once More for contesting Elections

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Its all bout how u see. Kejru won not coz of his 49 days. He won coz there was no Congress. All congress votes went to AAP. This itself was enough for AAP to win this way.

This was TOI Front Page last week.

Delhi elections 2015: Bhagora? 49-day term proves to be an asset, not a liability for AAP - The Times of India

 

[lightoftruth]

And 70% of Delhi belong to these classes?

yes just lower middle can do,volatile vote bank though.