CardSharp
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2010
- Messages
- 9,355
- Reaction score
- 0
Shouldn't that be the drive for them to expand in search of more "living space for the master race"?
On a serious note I think that our opinions differ regarding Vietnam's economical developments (a half empty half full argument). You see that Vietnam is impoverished due to decades of war and lags behind all of her neighbors while I see that the Vietnamese (unlike the North Koreans) are on the right track and has tremendous growth potentials. The PRC was equally impoverished about 30 years ago and just look how far we've come.
I think both of us missed a major point that could be the decisive advantage for the Vietnamese in the South China Sea conflict. Although they probably can't depend on the Americans for military assistance we have to keep in mind that Western media is already working in favor for them. Look up any newspaper article on the South China Sea contention and you will see journalists labeling the Chinese as the aggressors, despite the fact that China had the historic claim of these islands. The Vietnamese is backed by world opinion at this stage. We must convince the world otherwise or we'll really be the "invaders" in a future conflict.
Oh I think we agree far more than we disagree. I am also bullish on Vietnam. They have a very good work ethnic and are moving towards good economic reforms. My point was only that they started on the "right" track much later than the others in the area.
Also I wouldn't care too much about western opinion when local opinion is against them
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...ys-us-not-needed-south-china-sea-dispute.html