My father and both of my brothers served in the army. Besides, as Iranians, we have to right to speak up regardless of our talent for war.....that's what you guys have turned our country into, an angry, paranoid, broken, corrupt and violent country. A place where you try to silence people who have a legitimate right to speak. It's is a shame, that people in some Arab countries have more freedoms than we do. Like I said before regardless what happens during this election....The time for making people scared, making people disappear and making threats is fast coming to an end.....enjoy it because WINTER IS COMING.
you have right to speak , but you don't have right to lie and scare people and except other shout their mouth and don't protest ....
Sanctions
Further information:
Sanctions against Iran
The following provisions regarding sanctions are written into the JCPOA:
- Following the issuance of a IAEA report verifying implementation by Iran of the nuclear-related measures, the UN sanctions against Iran and some EU sanctions will terminate and some will be suspended. Once sanctions are lifted, Iran will recover approximately $100 billion of its assets (U.S. Treasury Department estimate) frozen in overseas banks.[87]
- Eight years into the agreement, EU sanctions against a number of Iranian companies, individuals and institutions (such as the Revolutionary Guards) will be lifted.[88]
- The United States will "cease" application of its nuclear-related secondary sanctions[89] by presidential action or executive waiver.[90] Secondary sanctions are those that sanction other countries for doing business with Iran. Primary U.S. sanctions, which prohibit U.S. firms from conducting commercial transactions with few exceptions, are not altered by the JCPOA.[91]
- This step is not tied to any specific date, but is expected to occur "roughly in the first half of 2016".[89][92][93]
- Sanctions relating to ballistic missile technologies would remain for eight years; similar sanctions on conventional weapon sales to Iran would remain for five years.[33][94]
- However, all U.S. sanctions against Iran related to alleged human rights abuses, missiles, and support for terrorism are not affected by the agreement and will remain in place.[53][95] U.S. sanctions are viewed as more stringent, since many have extraterritorial effect (i.e., they apply worldwide). EU sanctions, by contrast, apply only in Europe.[88]
- No new UN or EU nuclear-related sanctions or restrictive measures will be imposed.[96]
- If Iran violates the agreement, any of the P5+1 can invoke a "snap back" provision, under which the sanctions "snap back" into place (i.e., are reimplemented).[51][52][96]
- Specifically, the JCPOA establishes the following dispute resolution process: if a party to the JCPOA has reason to believe that another party is not upholding its commitments under the agreement, then the complaining party may refer its complaint to the Joint Commission, a body created under the JCPOA to monitor implementation.[53][97] If a complaint made by a non-Iran party is not resolved to the satisfaction of the complaining party within thirty-five days of referral, then that party could treat the unresolved issue as grounds to cease performing its commitments under the JCPOA, notify the United Nations Security Council that it believes the issue constitutes significant non-performance, or both.[97] The Security Council would then have thirty days to adopt a resolution to continue the lifting of sanctions. If such a resolution is not adopted within those thirty days, then the sanctions of all of the pre-JCPOA nuclear-related UN Security Council resolutions would automatically be re-imposed. Iran has stated that in such a case, it would cease performing its nuclear obligations under the deal.[42][97] The effect of this rule is that any permanent member of the Security Council (United States, United Kingdom, China, Russia and France) can veto any ongoing sanctions relief, but no member can veto the re-imposition of sanctions.
- Snapback sanctions "would not apply with retroactive effect to contracts signed between any party and Iran or Iranian individuals and entities prior to the date of application, provided that the activities contemplated under and execution of such contracts are consistent with this JCPOA and the previous and current UN Security Council resolutions".[57]
Ankit Panda of
The Diplomat states that this will make impossible any scenario where Iran is non-compliant with the JCPOA yet escapes re-imposition of sanctions.
[97] Mark Dubowitz of the
Foundation for Defense of Democracies (which opposes the agreement) argues, however, that because the JCPOA provides that Iran could treat reinstatement of sanctions (in part or entirely) as grounds for leaving the agreement, the United States would be reluctant to impose a "snapback" for smaller violations: "The only thing you'll take to the Security Council are massive Iranian violations, because you're certainly not going to risk the Iranians walking away from the deal and engaging in nuclear escalation over smaller violations."
[98]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action#Sanctions
you are lying and in same time try to silence other people by spreading fear .... and ironically , you are saying that someone like me who is just saying the truth ( just read above document ) is dictator who is trying to silence you ... for sure , I strongly believe that you guys are lying and just show proof of your lies in just 3 minutes ....
if you don't accept Wikipedia , just go and read this docs from your Lord's official website :
https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/iran/jcpoa/
boy , this is international community and most of member of this site knew basic English so you can't come and say nonsense and obvious lies and except all member act like they are ignorant fools ...
as I said ,
you guys are beacon of hypocrisy ... and don't be happy about some Arabs , western , Indian or Pakistani and Turks come here and support you because you can simply track their post and see what your support think about Iran and how much hatred they have toward Iran ....