Not a word about MMA under the banner of mush, not a word about enlighten moderation that had put Pakistan in a hell hole, not a word about PPP and their buddy sharifs. Seduced by $ sharifs and zardaries bhuttos and the power hungry, Two extremes can't be right include liberals not to forget mqm was creation of zia ul haq
.
Hon Sir,
You are quite correct there are many others involved in Pakistan’s slide into anarchy. This includes MQM & ANP fight for the control of Karachi.
I limited my post to condemning Zia ul Haq & JI & Afghan war primarily because that was the foundation of most of the troubles such as Kalashnikov culture, drug menace & sectarianism.
I have experienced Pakistan from her birth and grew up during the Ayub era when Pakistan had better standard of living than India and many Far East countries and was a happy place to live. I therefore blame the people responsible for her decline more than those that came after. However, it is no excuse and later governments are equally guilty by letting the rot increase without doing anything about it.
I am from a family of Syeds and have Sunnis as well as Shias among my relations. I therefore find sectarianism especially abhorrent. You are entitled to practice what you believe but must you kill Hazaras just cecause they are Shia or bomb a gathering of Sunnis Tehreek because of their maslak? TTP are the worst offenders, didn’t you read that they butchered Shia prisoners with knife during the KPK jail break. Now Sunni Ulemas are being targeted probably by the Shia terrorists in revenge. When will this tit for tat murders stop?
For someone like me, who is partial to Sufi Islam, attacks on Data Durbar, Pakpattan shrine, Bari Imam, Abdulla Shah Ghazi etc. are very painful. I singled out Jamaat Islami because the bigot Munawwar Hassan is the biggest supporter of Taliban and thus of sectarianism.
I am also against Imran Khan, who despite spent spending most his life sporting the Western Culture; heard that PTI gatherings in Karachi also had Pakistani pop music; has now allied himself with the anti-Pakistan Jamaat Islami.
I know that Imran himself is anti - sectarian but he sponsored a ‘Dharna’ in the support of the sectarian Taliban for the right wing vote? Doesn’t this make Imran khan a hypocrite of the first order?
Here is an article in Dawn highlighting the sectarian problem in Pakistan.
The sectarian knot
FROM THE NEWSPAPER
Published 2014-01-07 07:32:32
OVER the last few decades, especially since virulently sectarian groups took root during Ziaul Haq’s blighted rule, violence fuelled by sectarian motives has had a devastating impact on Pakistani society. Much blood has flowed while prejudice has begun to colour the thinking of even many ‘moderate’ Pakistanis who now view sectarian ‘others’ with suspicion. While there have been highs and lows in the level of violence, what has consistently been missing is the state’s resolve to tackle the problem, especially the proliferation of violent groups and the spread of hate literature. It seems the state is more interested in trying to control the violence rather than eliminating it. Many in the ulema’s ranks have also displayed a similar attitude, condemning sectarianism on one hand but doing little to counter it on the other.
There is still time to address the issue if all stakeholders play their part. In this context, the ‘peace convention’ of Shia and Sunni religious and political groups held in Islamabad on Sunday is a positive development. It shows that the majority want peaceful coexistence and that only a handful of troublemakers are bent on stoking unrest. Yet holding joint rallies — though a step forward — alone will not solve the problem, which has reached critical proportions. Take the figure of people killed in sectarian terrorist attacks in 2013 released on Sunday by a think tank. According to the Pakistan Institute of Peace Studies, 658 people were killed in such attacks last year countrywide, while 1,195 were injured.
To try and ensure that 2014 does not see a similar body count, several steps need to be taken by the government and ulema. First, any armed sectarian group from any school of thought found involved in acts of terrorism or targeted killings must be dismantled and its members prosecuted. The security establishment has a fair idea about the operations of such groups and those that give them protection and political cover. For example, the PIPS report says nine suicide attacks were carried out by Lashkar-i-Jhangvi last year. All those who aid and abet the terrorists must be brought to justice. Second, the state, aided by senior ulema, needs to clamp down on the misuse of loudspeakers at mosques and other worship places, specifically where the microphone is used to fan religious hatred. Nearly all religious groups — even some blatantly sectarian ones — swear they want harmony in society. The test of their resolve will only be proved when they help the state single out mischief-makers who spread hatred through mosque microphones. Ultimately, it is a question of whether the state and ulema have the will to sincerely tackle sectarian violence. Unless we see concrete proof of this, joint rallies or a code of conduct, such as that of Tahir Ashrafi, to maintain sectarian harmony, will have little impact in resolving the problem
The sectarian knot - DAWN.COM
