Why? IF it did happen then the indian government would want to broadcast it to the rest of the world to malign Pakistan and showcase indian military power. That was the whole point. If not then it puts ALL indian claims in serious doubt.
There are specific reasons to restrict the photographs and videographs; they have to do with the details of the operation, as they reveal certain details which are not desirable to be shown at the moment.
It is also not important for the Indian government to broadcast it to the rest of the world to malign Pakistan and showcase Indian military power; by thinking that, you are letting yourself think like the rest of the fanboys. The rest of the world knows what it needs to know. All the major powers were briefed, to the extent necessary. They do not need to be convinced with the kind of specific forensic detail that you are asking for, because some of these governments know, from their own experience, what is credible and what is not. They are aware that there is a long history of cross-border raiding; they are aware that certain things are possible,certain other things are not possible. They can piece together, as some experts on PDF already have, the most probable scenario, including various options for action within a scenario. They can judge, from the statements released by ISPR, what, out of the possible options, might have been the most probable option. They also get reinforcement of their own reconstructions from comparison and evaluation of the contrary ideas given to them by each government concerned. And some of them, with their superior intelligence-gathering methods and capabilities, already know as much as the Indian and Pakistani governments and their militaries know.
So they don't need convincing. They need reassuring. They get reassurances from the government; this is now of primary importance, once they know that something happened, and what most likely happened. They have been getting precisely that from the Delhi government, and that is one reason, among other reasons, why they are inclined to believe what is being said to them by India.
That will obviously not convince fanboys, who are deeply invested in the loyalty to 'their' side, 'their' army, 'their' cause. To these fanboys, Indian and Pakistani, nothing short of a film script will be of interest, or will be worth believing.It MUST have been like it has been in movies that they have seen, because they have no other standard of comparison. Unlike governments, which are able to grasp the essentials from a relatively few bare facts, fanboys need convincing in detail, not only that something happened, but also that their own side's contrary statements are false. That is never going to happen. Convincing fanboys is never going to be possible, because their being convinced, to them, means the complete destruction of their fundamental faith and belief. So it won't happen. Pictures will have been doctored, videos will have been tampered with, documents will be forged, clues will have been manufactured.
Therefore, there is no point in giving away vital aspects of the operation merely to gain the approbation of those who don't matter, those who are part of the problem, yet not part of the solutions.
There are a bare handful on this forum who are sufficiently connected to find out what might have happened. Their conclusions have already been presented. Nothing else is going to happen for the time being.
International matters do not run on faith. If you are sure that SF conducted a dream strikes across the border, why running away from showing some concrete proofs? There are several versions of thrillin storiez being aired by your media and their substance doffer each other. Dont come up with lame reasons, just to the point, and if you dont have anything, then dont tag me please.
Thanks
International matters do not run on faith, they also do not run on the laws of evidence required by courts. They run on credibility. None of the ridiculous stories created by media are correct; this is emphatically not what other governments have been told. They have been told the truth, and they will have resources to gauge the authenticity of what they are being told, and the experience of past briefings and subsequent developments to allow them to assign credibility to these.
As I said, you are already my b!tch, and what you are doing right now is moaning. I will let you moan. People are laughing at you and you are providing good entertainment. Lookup son, check our conversation, you are already in my pocket.
Heh.
I am afraid you have just been using the same language, the same coarse insults, the same defences that phonies do when they are caught. Give it up before you run out of space and start getting punished. You won't get told this again.