What's new

The Shame Of India

I think writer has adopt neutral posture. Not criticizing the acquiring the career but the bizarre condition of navel equipment and maintenance.;)
 
.
August 13, 2010: The Indian government conducted an inspection of their naval aviation, and were not happy with what they found. Some of the problems were known. For example, a year ago, India's sole operational aircraft carrier, the INS Viraat returned to service, after 18 months in a shipyard for upgrades and refurbishment.

But it's primary aircraft, AV-8 Harriers. were grounded because of a recent crash that destroyed one of the Harriers. That left the carrier with only a dozen or so helicopters.

India has long had problems with its carriers and its AV-8 carrier aircraft. The government investigators found that only about 40 percent of the AV-8s were available for use most of the time. It was known that many Harriers were unavailable for service because of maintenance problems, but the extent of the problem was a shocker. The inspectors also uncovered other problems that were not generally known. For example, the air-to-air missiles used by the AV-8s had not undergone practice firings since 2003. Worse, the bombs carried by the AV-8s were obsolete and there was little ammunition available for the 30mm autocannon carried by the AV-8. The electronics on the AV-8s were in bad shape as well. But worse was the sad state of the carrier helicopters, which were also old and frequently out of action for maintenance or waiting for spare parts.

The AV-8 is a STOVL (vertical takeoff and landing) aircraft that first entered service in 1969. That early version was used mainly by the British Royal Navy and the U.S. Marine Corps. It was a 11 ton aircraft (7 tons when taking off vertically) that carried about two tons of weapons. In the 1980s, a more powerful 14 ton version was developed, which could carry three tons of weapons.

The AV-8 has the highest accident rate of any jet fighter. This is largely because of its vertical flight capabilities, which give it an accident rate similar to that of helicopters. The U.S. Marine Corps has lost a third of its 397 AV-8s to such accidents in 32 years. In the last twenty years, India has lost most of its 30 AV-8s vertical takeoff fighters to accidents, and now only has eleven of those left.

The U.S. is replacing its AV-8s with the new F-35B. The Indians have bought eight retired AV-8s from Britain, and refurbished their current ones, to keep the Viraat armed with jet aircraft for the last ten years of its service life.

Meanwhile, India has agreed to pay more money, and wait longer, to complete the delayed refurbishment of the Russian aircraft carrier Gorshkov. The Russians not only demanded more money, but also admitted that a labor shortage would delay delivery until 2012. Once refurbished, the Gorshkov (INS Vikramaditya), should be good for about 30 years of service. That's because, after the refit, 70 percent of the ships equipment will be new, and the rest refurbished.

India has operated carriers for decades, having initially acquired INS Vikrant from Britain in 1961. Vikrant was decommissioned in 1997. India acquired a second carrier, also from Britain, the Viraat, in 1986. When it enters service in 2012, the Vikramaditya/Gorshkov will operate sixteen navalized MiG-29 fighters, plus some helicopters.

India is also building a 42,000 ton carrier, or Air Defense Ship (ADS) and will begin construction of a second one once the first one is launched. The first ADS ship is expected to enter service in 2012, and the second one in 2017. Each ADS ship will have a similar aircraft complement to the Vikramaditya.
Naval Air: The Shame Of India
@MY Indian fellowmates:

Guys, I think the article refers to the shame on our MOD because of its corrupt and inefficient policies. Certainly aircraft carriers are not something to be ashamed of and are the dream machines of every navy around the planet.

The article in real sense is relevant and sensible because it is indeed a shame on MOD that our pilots both in IAF and IN are losing lives because of some inefficient, civilian, uneducated-in-defense, corrupt netas running the ministry all Socialist style rather than adopting change.

We get to hear all big headlines but how many of those are really implemented as of yet to be seen in action? All articles make 2012 year as though it will be the year our entire armed forces get all new stuff instantly. But it is also another date like the thousands that DRDO and their corrupt government bodies have mis-managed.

How many times has MOD canceled artillery and gunship contracts before and re-started after making India a laughing stock in front of all the suppliers? Not even managable on fingertips.

The article reflects the bitter truth that by showing a "grand future" mirage in the forthcoming years, MOD is simply eating up money for nothing and that is costing our soldiers whether land, sea or air their lives. We must demand answers from MOD and their accountability.
 
.
if this author had written a similar article about our ministry of defense i would have agreed ,hell i would have even thanked haider for his useful post.but the navy its not digestable.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom