mughal arslan shah mirza
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 383
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
The three gunpowder empires :
Mughals-Safavid-Ottomans
Mughals-Safavid-Ottomans
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Nihonjin1051
Another intersting factor about the Mughals is that on the Western front, they were figthing against the Safavid empire. Most of the fights took place over who will control parts of Afghanistan. They fought many wars in what is today eastern afghanistan especially Kandahar area.
Would not have happened, they were fighting each other for the control of kandaharIsn't that interesting? Imagine if the Mughals and Safavids combined their territories into one Empire?
An extremely rare portrait of jehangir holding a grenade
or is it a perfectly formed brinjal which mughals were extremely fond of?An extremely rare portrait of jehangir holding a grenade
Would not have happened, they were fighting each other for the control of kandahar
Safavids, Mughals and Ottomans all spoke the same language and had same origins. It would be possible.Isn't that interesting? Imagine if the Mughals and Safavids combined their territories into one Empire?
Safavids, Mughals and Ottomans all spoke the same language and had same origins. It would be possible.
Safavids, Mughals and Ottomans all spoke the same language and had same origins. It would be possible.
Turkic dynasties, in this case Mughal, Ottomans and Safavids' mother language was Turkic. For example Babur's biography was written in Turki. Persian was only used for poetry and some administrative things. Mughal, Safavids and Ottomans could have fused their empire together but instead they weakened each other. It is historical mistake they made.That's right bro. Persian , as i read, was the language of the royal court in the Mughal Empire. Actually, this is how the modern language of Urdu came about. Urdu being a fusion of Persian and Hindi.
BS, as a tamil our people were never ruled by Muslims, stop lying u wannabe Mughal. Every time they attempted to invade, the vijaynagars defeated them
There are no heirs of Safavids so I'm fine with it.How do u feel about pakistanis claiming ur empires?
Malik Kafur, a general of the Delhi Sultan Alauddin Khilji invaded and sacked Madurai in 1311 Pandyas and their descendants where confined to a small region around Thirunelveli for a few more years. Ravivarman Kulasekara (1299–1314), a Chera feudatory of Kulasekara Pandya, staked his claim to the Pandya throne. Ravivarman Kulasekhara, utilising the unsettled nature of the country, quickly overran the southern Tamil Nadu and brought the entire region from Kanyakumari to Kanchipuram, under the Chera kingdom. His inscription was found in Punaamalli, a suburb of Madras. Deccan Sultans also had strong historical rule over Tamil Nadu.
Tamils were verily much under the suzerainty of Muslims Shahs. Many of these were tributary states to the Mughal Empire.
how can you call mughals as turkik empire, they had no contact with turkey as far as I know. They used farsi in their courts. Genetically early moghuls might be .. then they got heavily desi mixed.There are no heirs of Safavids so I'm fine with it.
Iranians also claim Safavid Empire. I'm more angry about that since only heirs of Safavids are Azerbaijani people.
Same way only heirs of Ottomans are Turks.
LOL, seems like u are a Muslim lover. The Madurai sultanate only ruled tamil border lands for 15 years. So yes, Muslims ruled tamils for 15 years
Lol, why is pakistani calling himself Mughal, I am tamil lankan anyway. Never been ruled by muslims although we respect the Mughals.