What's new

The Farce of Western Free Speech

All I needed from you was a bit respect..

Why do you need his respect?
He is an inconsequential nothing, deluded by his own self-importance.

Make the Islamic world strong, dominate their media, and the European leaders will grovel for YOUR respect. Ordinary European citizens will either adapt or be marginalized as extremist fanatics.

Oh Sire!
You're expecting too much.You've an idealistic world in view.

I am not an idealist. I am a realist who knows how unfair the world really is.

What we are trying to do is to highlight the fact that there is hypocrisy in the "free speech" debate.
 
To be honest i see all this as a good thing. the fronts are clear, we are united against an enemy and it is spoken out that islam is incompatible with our culture. right wing parties were already on the rise all over europe. This events push it in the right direction. Also i never saw so many mohamed caricatures ever before. This cult has been finally exposed as what it is.
Yes you are absolutely right the fight is not with some random terrorists but the ideology/relegion which is incompatible with modern society.SO is the perfect time for the for 500 million people of E.U to remove the cancer of 1 million people until it destroyed their way of life.

I don't understand French are so delusional in 21st century unlike their ancestor Charles Mortel who stopped the islamization of west in 8th century.

Lastly i quote geert wilders "i am not against Muslims but Islam"
 
respect must be earned and is not a free thing. So far nothing in the islamic world shows anything that i can respect.
I am sure that you haven't been out of Europe yet. Trust me, world is different than your perception.

let me ask you something, why am i not allowed to visit Mecca? And do you think we should create an equal policiy and ban muslims from visiting Rome?
You need to ask this question from Saudis not from me. You are free to travel any where in my country. You are more than welcome. Every country have different rules and regulations.
 
Well the solution is very simple and Practical , EUROPEANS drink their Coffee and Muslims drink the Tea and chill
out ....

What is the worse that could happen , Muslims might invade Europe or worse Russia will take over Europe anyways

70,000 folks died in Syria , due to weapons supplied from Europe and else where don't hear anyone complaining , so few incidents should not cause concern these are random acts
of vengeance could happen to anyone.
 
Yes you are absolutely right the fight is not with some random terrorists but the ideology/relegion which is incompatible with modern society.SO is the perfect time for the for 500 million people of E.U to remove the cancer of 1 million people until it destroyed their way of life.

I don't understand French are so delusional in 21st century unlike their ancestor Charles Mortel who stopped the islamization of west in 8th century.

Lastly i quote geert wilders "i am not against Muslims but Islam"
How about banning your kind from visiting Nankana? Make sense. Isn't it?
 
What we are trying to do is to highlight the fact that there is hypocrisy in the "free speech" debate.
Their country, their rules!!!
Those who're incongruous to it can shift to a place which they deem fit.
 
Their country, their rules!!!
Those who're incongruous to it can shift to a place which they deem fit.

Of course, any country can enact any laws it wishes.
And others can point out any hypocrisy inherent in those laws.

No one is telling France what laws to pass. We are merely highlighting their hypocrisy.
 
How about banning your kind from visiting Nankana? Make sense. Isn't it?
Who said i care abt Nankana you can go ahead and blow that up like your brothers did in Bamiyan.
 
Who said i care abt Nankana you can go ahead and blow that up like your brothers did in Bamiyan.
Like Sikh terrorists who highjacked the Air India planes back in Indra Gandhi's era or the Sikh terrorists who played the Golden temple's card just to get the sympathy from the world? Matter fact, the ones who shot and killed Indra Gandhi were Sikhs. What would you call them?
 
Last edited:
Yes you are absolutely right the fight is not with some random terrorists but the ideology/relegion which is incompatible with modern society.SO is the perfect time for the for 500 million people of E.U to remove the cancer of 1 million people until it destroyed their way of life.

I don't understand French are so delusional in 21st century unlike their ancestor Charles Mortel who stopped the islamization of west in 8th century.

Lastly i quote geert wilders "i am not against Muslims but Islam"

Lol @ the amount of stupidity and innocence in one post.

I also think its the perfect time for 500 million people of E.U to remove cancer of few thousands of terrorists first, 1 million is a big shot.
 
Yes you are absolutely right the fight is not with some random terrorists but the ideology/relegion which is incompatible with modern society.SO is the perfect time for the for 500 million people of E.U to remove the cancer of 1 million people until it destroyed their way of life.

I don't understand French are so delusional in 21st century unlike their ancestor Charles Mortel who stopped the islamization of west in 8th century.

Lastly i quote geert wilders "i am not against Muslims but Islam"


100% agree
 
to the defenders and apologists of usa government...

go guide the "occupy wall street" movement in usa and call for a peaceful socialist system to become the usa government... do this and you will see the full force of western democracy.

plus do this in all the puppet nations of usa government.

until then, there should be no more debate on this.
 
to the defenders and apologists of usa government...

go guide the "occupy wall street" movement in usa and call for a peaceful socialist system to become the usa government... do this and you will see the full force of western democracy.

plus do this in all the puppet nations of usa government.

until then, there should be no more debate on this.
loolz man ... :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
We have shown that numerous European countries have laws restricting speech around specific subjects which they consider sensitive.

But I don't expect you to understand plain English. Best to move along...

I think you have serious comprehension problem with English. Please read my previous posts where I clearly explained about law of land. I am not saying that law of land is cannot be biased, but you have no option but to follow.
 
Back
Top Bottom