Kinetic
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 11,200
- Reaction score
- -33
Did I say you did? Pointed out a fact? Why act so butt hurt?
Its he who pointed out a fact against your as usual rant to divert the thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did I say you did? Pointed out a fact? Why act so butt hurt?
It mean the Singapore take better care of their navy. India AF is way too army oriented.
It mean the Singapore take better care of their navy. India AF is way too army oriented.
Not to belittle RSN or anything.
Singapore has a smaller navy to begin with and how much "care" does it need anyway that is comparable to IN.
With respect to anti-piracy operations and the multiple belligerent nations all around India you would think otherwise.
Considering its packing one of the most advanced ships this side of the pond, I reckon they need way more care than the standard Indian Navy ship.
Not to belittle the IN, but you guys ain't exactly known for "safety." In this area.
Oh really? On what category are IN ships not comparable or better than RSN ships?
Please don't take the hyperbolic media reports as the gospel of truth naval accidents happen all over the world they are just not as exaggerated as ours is.
He clearly specified that he was referring to "navies that operate regularly in Asian waters" . And according to him it's not limited to Asia pacific. And Indian ocean region is included in his analysis & he makes it crystal clear in the initial part of his article . He also gave the reason for leaving Indian Navy out.All your points are valid, and I do agree that it was unfortunate that the author did not include the Indian Navy, as it is indeed a powerful naval force. If i had to attempt to explain the author's analysis -- probably he was referring to the Asia-Pacific Rim nations' navies. In an analysis of the Indian Ocean Region, am sure the Indian Navy would be #1 in that list.
Me too Every indian in this forumis thinking WTF , IN not in top 5 Navy in Asia??? By the way i am also in that Indian listI am Here for Enjoyment
So you agree with the author assumption????He clearly specified that he was referring to "navies that operate regularly in Asian waters" . And according to him it's not limited to Asia pacific. And Indian ocean region is included in his analysis & he makes it crystal clear in the initial part of his article . He also gave the reason for leaving Indian Navy out.
Me too Every indian in this forumis thinking WTF , IN not in top 5 Navy in Asia??? By the way i am also in that Indian list
Me too Every indian in this forumis thinking WTF , IN not in top 5 Navy in Asia??? By the way i am also in that Indian list
So you agree with the author assumption????
Its he who pointed out a fact against your as usual rant to divert the thread.
You know what happened
We conquered French Indochina in 5 days, the Symbol of British Power (Singapore) collapses to is in 7 days. The Dutch , we eviscerated as well. The force that drained our resources were the Americans. It was the US Navy that broke the Imperial Navy. Thus I have utmost respect for their adaptive ability and capability.
JMSDF --- we only really fear one power --- the USN.
Even the PLAN -- we do not fear them as much as the USN.