What's new

The 5 Most Deadly Navies in Asia

Even before there was an Indian Navy, or Korean Navy, Japan had already defeated China in the Sino Japanese War, and the Russians in the Russo Japanese War.

Japan pioneered carrier based airwarfare through our Kido Butai. Don't let our relative silence evade our naval prowess in history and how that legacy still is alive in the JMSDF .

Koreans were nice too:

Battle of Myeongnyang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Nothing more to say

Indian_Navy_flotilla_of_Western_Fleet_escort_INS_Vikramaditya_(R33)_and_INS_Viraat_(R22)_in_the_Arabian_Sea.jpg


INS+Vikramaditya+Enters+The+Arabian+Sea+with+future+Carrier+battle+group+3.jpeg
 
Even before there was an Indian Navy, or Korean Navy, Japan had already defeated China in the Sino Japanese War, and the Russians in the Russo Japanese War.

Japan pioneered carrier based airwarfare through our Kido Butai. Don't let our relative silence evade our naval prowess in history and how that legacy still is alive in the JMSDF .

Japanese Forces is a sleeping giant.That WW2 type Navy is still not a problem for Japan.
 
The darnedest thing is that it was the British themselves that give the blue print for Japanese war machine and its plan for the invasion of the pacific.

We conquered French Indochina in 5 days, the Symbol of British Power (Singapore) collapses to is in 7 days. The Dutch , we eviscerated as well. The force that drained our resources were the Americans. It was the US Navy that broke the Imperial Navy. Thus I have utmost respect for their adaptive ability and capability.

JMSDF --- we only really fear one power --- the USN.

Even the PLAN -- we do not fear them as much as the USN.
 
An examination of Asia’s navies—or more precisely, navies that operate regularly in Asian waters—puts these questions in the spotlight, not least because there is a massive disparity in the size and quality of the maritime forces in question. In a (highly hypothetical) fight between, say, India and Singapore, you’d expect the Indian Navy (IN) to best the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN): it’s got bucketloads of experience, more ships, more manpower and more money to buy or build replacements.

But which is the better navy? In qualitative, operational and policy-making terms, you’d say Singapore’s. And that’s why the RSN in is in this top five list, and the IN doesn’t make the cut, despite its heritage, history, two aircraft carriers and imminent commissioning of a nuclear-armed submarine.



WTF does that even mean?
 
An examination of Asia’s navies—or more precisely, navies that operate regularly in Asian waters—puts these questions in the spotlight, not least because there is a massive disparity in the size and quality of the maritime forces in question. In a (highly hypothetical) fight between, say, India and Singapore, you’d expect the Indian Navy (IN) to best the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN): it’s got bucketloads of experience, more ships, more manpower and more money to buy or build replacements.

But which is the better navy? In qualitative, operational and policy-making terms, you’d say Singapore’s. And that’s why the RSN in is in this top five list, and the IN doesn’t make the cut, despite its heritage, history, two aircraft carriers and imminent commissioning of a nuclear-armed submarine.



WTF does that even mean?

It mean the Singapore take better care of their navy. India Armed Forces is way too army oriented.
 
Back
Top Bottom