What's new

Taiwan to Follow Hong Kong

Didn't you see the Economist article and charts above? We are light years ahead of India in terms of social indicators, we don't starve 5.6 million children to death every year or have the majority of our population going to the toilet on the floor.

China does lack in political freedoms, that is true. Though on an individual level you can say almost anything, go to any Chinese forum and watch people openly swearing at the highest Chinese leaders like Hu Jintao. It's only when you start a large political movement that can actually threaten the CPC that you are in danger of being clamped down on.

Anyway, Wen Jiabao already said several times that China needs political liberalization to go along with our economic liberalization. It's only a matter of time before it happens. This is the East Asian model of development, focus on industrial output first under an authoritarian government, then political liberalization later, when development is at its final stages.

I did read ..and hence questioned your logic on when you said liberalization is function prosperity ....but you don't seem to have ny ..all you have are Wen Jiabaos speeches to content with. Besides political liberalization is not the only freedom..

Where is your religious freedom, freedom of speech..or even freedom access even a site on internet?

You are but a decade ahead of India on some of the social indicators but again ligtyears behind on liberalization.
 
SINCE WE ALL LOVE CHINA! how about a referandum like we will have in scotland and wales in TIBET. HK AND TAIWAN WITHOUTH MISSILES?

China is not a democracy, we do not believe in referendums. :lol:

On the other hand, shining democratic India PROMISED a referendum to the Kashmiri people.

But as usual, they have failed to live up to their promise. If even a "shining democracy" like India refuses to live up to it's promise to give the Kashmiris a referendum, how can you ask a non-democracy like China to do so?

Anyway, all the minority provinces in China will soon be majority Han Chinese. So even if there was a referendum it would always favour China.

---------- Post added at 07:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 AM ----------

You are but a decade ahead of India on some of the social indicators but again ligtyears behind on liberalization.

Umm... no. Read the Economist article, India is 40 years behind mainland China in terms of social indicators. :wave:
 
You seems like a prime example of an adolescent hillbilly, who has grown up only on govt propaganda, forget about going to other countries but someone who never even steeped out of his village or even so much so as read even a neutral newspaper or magazine.
Hence your present sate of schizophrenic delusion though regrettable but is understandable..so Get Help!!

i like how you have nothing to say, then again, after exposing your fake democracy and joke freedom what is there even left for you talk about? economy? how we are 4 times larger than yours and growing in double digits while your hopes for double digits growth is only occurring in inflation? how about military then? while china is able to produce almost everything domestically, india has to look to foreign supplies because not even your own country buy your own indian arms. what about public health? 65% of indians defecate in the street, nuff' said. education? 74% of indians are literate, 92% china. we also have world class institution while you have none.

you see, besides your fake democracy and joke freedom, there is absolutely nothing india can compare with china about. india can only be compared to africa. before you get offended, know that india was never a real country. the british created india as a long term strategy to keep asia in bondage so it may never rise to challenge white hegemony. that is the only purpose of india.
 
GLAD TO KNOW HANS ARE BIGOTS?

Racism now? What a true Indian you are. :lol:

you see, besides your fake democracy and joke freedom, there is absolutely nothing india can compare with china about. india can only be compared to africa. before you get offended, know that india was never a real country. the british created india as a long term strategy to keep asia in bondage so it may never rise to challenge white hegemony. that is the only purpose of india.

Actually India is behind Africa. India has more poverty than the entire African continent combined, more people practicing open defecation, and more people starving to death than the whole world combined.

It's common knowledge now, that once Africa was at the bottom of the heap in terms of starvation and malnutrition, but now India is at the very bottom, below even Africa.
 
China is not a democracy, we do not believe in referendums. :lol:

On the other hand, shining democratic India PROMISED a referendum to the Kashmiri people.

But as usual, they have failed to live up to their promise. If even a "shining democracy" like India refuses to live up to it's promise to give the Kashmiris a referendum, how can you ask a non-democracy like China to do so?

Anyway, all the minority provinces in China will soon be majority Han Chinese. So even if there was a referendum it would always favour China.

---------- Post added at 07:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 AM ----------



Umm... no. Read the Economist article, India is 40 years behind mainland China in terms of social indicators. :wave:


Your entire arguments is based on that only Indians do not like the Chinese but there are plenty other nationalities too who do not like Chinese authoritarian form of govt and Chinese nationalists who support such sys of governance.

Your inability to judge people(or judge them wrong) is the fundamental flaw which shows in your arguments itself.
 
Your inability to judge people(or judge them wrong) is the fundamental flaw which shows in your arguments itself.

LOL if you think the BBC is wrong for quoting the UN Human development report, that India has more poverty and starvation than Africa, then take it up with them.

If you think "the Economist" is wrong for saying that India is 40 years behind China in terms of social indicators, then take it up with them.

I am posting neutral sources from your beloved West, who are now ranking you guys below Africa.
 
i like how you have nothing to say, then again, after exposing your fake democracy and joke freedom what is there even left for you talk about? economy? how we are 4 times larger than yours and growing in double digits while your hopes for double digits growth is only occurring in inflation? how about military then? while china is able to produce almost everything domestically, india has to look to foreign supplies because not even your own country buy your own indian arms. what about public health? 65% of indians defecate in the street, nuff' said. education? 74% of indians are literate, 92% china. we also have world class institution while you have none.

you see, besides your fake democracy and joke freedom, there is absolutely nothing india can compare with china about. india can only be compared to africa. before you get offended, know that india was never a real country. the british created india as a long term strategy to keep asia in bondage so it may never rise to challenge white hegemony. that is the only purpose of india.

Only fool would think ..that he was exposing anything but his own cockiness.

Just like your previous diatribe this post of your again exposes your are some teenage kid ..who does not even know his own roots (ie what were the conditions in China, not long ago)..but just wants to brag his new found success even it though makes him seem like an uneducated delinquent.
 
BUT U HAVE BEATEN US IN TIANNMAN, TIBET.ETC, CHINESE HANS ARE FAR AHEAD OF US KILLING THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

The only difference is that PLA only killed those CIA backed rebels who deliberately set fire and chaos in our national capital.

Meanwhile the best your British master can do is to kill those defenceless poor Irish potato farmers.
 
BUT U HAVE BEATEN US IN TIANNMAN, TIBET.ETC, CHINESE HANS ARE FAR AHEAD OF US KILLING THEIR OWN PEOPLE?

world war 1
world war 2

more whites died by the hands of whites than there are whites in britain.

if world war 3 happens, im afraid there will be no more whites. the world needs to stop you guys from killing each other in these massive casual wars you have with each other.
 
Back
Top Bottom