What's new

Taiwan to Follow Hong Kong

Check out some videos on the internet, even your average Westerners can't tell the difference between Indians and Africans until they hear the accent. And of course they can't tell the difference between Chinese/Japanese either.

Indians prioritize pleasing their former colonial masters, over their fellow Asians who have suffered the same injustices that they have at the hands of the colonial powers. India is truly the one who will betray their fellow Asians first, just to get a pat on the head from the former colonial powers.

Indians always think themselves as the mighty Aryans, meanwhile they can't even successfully copy a 1960s aircraft.

Now China should do a good bidding for the whole Asia by getting rid of these fools.
 
Indians think themselves as Mighty Aryans, meanwhile they can't even successfully copy a 1960s aircraft.

Now China should do a good bidding for the whole Asia by getting rid of these fools.

SAME COULD HAVE BEEN SAID OF CHINESE WHEN THEY TRIED TO INVADE CHINA (TAIWAN), VIETNAM OR WERE A PART OF JAPAN?
 
According to the Press Freedom index, Hong Kong is the #2 most free in Asia, just behind Japan, while India does not even rank in the top 100. Read it again. :lol:

In Hong Kong we don't arrest people for saying bad things about Sonia Gandhi (lol) and we don't charge people like Binayak Sen with sedition for saying nice things about Maoists.

As for China, here read a neutral source from The Economist:

Comparing India and China: Chasing the dragon | The Economist



20111008_WOC579_0.gif


You are 40 years behind in terms of social indicators compared to mainland China. :lol:

Not to mention that India has more poor people than Africa, and starves more people to death than the rest of the world combined.

Why have different sets of standards?

If you are comparing Hongkong with entire India on press freedom ..then why are you afraid of comparing rest of China with Indian on same rules.

Social indicators are not a reflection of rights or freedoms in a country.

But as you say HongKong is more liberal than India and your liberalism is byproduct of your slavery(not shared by rest of China)..what can we conclude from this?
 
Freedom? India? don't make me LOL the only rights and freedom your fake democracy has is the freedom to defecate anywhere (india is rank #1 is public defecation in the world; 65% of all indians openly defecate in the public). in china, that would be illegal. if that is the kind of freedom indians have, then trust me, nobody envy you guys.

there is absolutely nothing remotely tangible in comparison between india and china, hence the mindless praising of western ideals: "democracy" and "freedom", which india neither has. your fake democracy is a blanket put over your eyes to keep the 1.2 billion hungry indians from going ape. it is working nicely. your "free" press is also a joke. it is only free in the sense that indians do not pay for news. india as a country is built on deception, then again, india was never a country until the british turned you into one. perhaps it times to break india up into little pieces like europe.
 
But as you say HongKong is more liberal than India and your liberalism is byproduct of your slavery(not shared by rest of China)..what can we conclude from this?

What we can conclude is that Hong Kong was colonized, but unlike the other British colonies (Nigeria/Somalia/Uganda/Yemen/Iraq/Afganistan/Burma/Zimbabwe)... we made the most out of it and turned outselves into a first-world advanced economy. Singapore did the same, and of course both HK and Singapore have majority Chinese populations.

India on the other hand, was created by the British and colonized for 200 years... but it is still one of the most backward countries on Earth, with more poor than the continent of Africa, and more starvation too. Light years behind even other third-world countries in terms of social indicators.
 
But as you say HongKong is more liberal than India and your liberalism is byproduct of your slavery(not shared by rest of China)..what can we conclude from this?

Then your so-called democracy is also a byproduct of the British colonization, which you guys are so proud of it.
 
What we can conclude is that Hong Kong was colonized, but unlike the other British colonies (Nigeria/Somalia/Uganda/Yemen/Iraq/Afganistan/Burma/Zimbabwe)... we made the most out of it and turned outselves into a first-world advanced economy. Singapore did the same, and of course both HK and Singapore have majority Chinese populations.

India on the other hand, was created by the British and colonized for 200 years... but it is still one of the most backward countries on Earth, with more poor than the continent of Africa, and more starvation too. Light years behind even other third-world countries in terms of social indicators.

If political or religious Liberalism is by product of development ..why don't your brethren the mainland have it are they still underdeveloped compared backwards colony(supposedly) such as India?

---------- Post added at 04:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:22 AM ----------

Then your so-called democracy is also a byproduct of the British colonization, which you guys are so proud of it.

Yes it is!!..who is denying it..unlike you we have the ability to see shades of grey ...nothing is all black or all white...ie nothing(including colonization) is all good or all bad.
 
If political or religious Liberalism is by product of development ..why don't your brethren the mainland have it are they still underdeveloped compared backwards colony(supposedly) such as India?

Didn't you see the Economist article and charts above? We are light years ahead of India in terms of social indicators, we don't starve 5.6 million children to death every year or have the majority of our population going to the toilet on the floor.

China does lack in political freedoms, that is true. Though on an individual level you can say almost anything, go to any Chinese forum and watch people openly swearing at the highest Chinese leaders like Hu Jintao. It's only when you start a large political movement that can actually threaten the CPC that you are in danger of being clamped down on.

Anyway, Wen Jiabao already said several times that China needs political liberalization to go along with our economic liberalization. It's only a matter of time before it happens. This is the East Asian model of development, focus on industrial output first under an authoritarian government, then political liberalization later, when development is at its final stages.
 
If political or religious Liberalism is by product of development ..why don't your brethren the mainland have it are they still underdeveloped compared backwards colony(supposedly) such as India?

Are you kidding me?!

Mainland China under developed compared to India?

Now i just get it, you are just the same group of fools who buy everything from your mouthpiece media who also said that Shanghai needs 20 years in order to catch up Mumbai. :rofl:

It is a such waste of time to talk with the propaganda programmed drone.
 
Are you kidding me?!

Mainland China under developed compared to India?

Now i just get it, you are just the same group of fools who buy everything from your mouthpiece media who also said that Shanghai needs 20 years in order to catch up Mumbai. :rofl:

It is a such waste of time to talk with the propaganda programmed drone.

LOL, Manmohan Singh saying that Mumbai would catch up with Shanghai in 5 years. Time is up, where is it? :rofl:

In fact, Shanghai and Beijing appear on lists like this:

Global Financial Centres Index

But where are Mumbai and New Delhi? Don't worry, they rank highly on the list below:

Forbes.com - The World's 25 Dirtiest Cities
 
What we can conclude is that Hong Kong was colonized, but unlike the other British colonies (Nigeria/Somalia/Uganda/Yemen/Iraq/Afganistan/Burma/Zimbabwe)... we made the most out of it and turned outselves into a first-world advanced economy. Singapore did the same, and of course both HK and Singapore have majority Chinese populations.

India on the other hand, was created by the British and colonized for 200 years... but it is still one of the most backward countries on Earth, with more poor than the continent of Africa, and more starvation too. Light years behind even other third-world countries in terms of social indicators.

and they will reply that everything is perfect and well because they are the worlds largest (fake) democracy and have freedom (to defecate anywhere they want). even though indians are physically starving, their minds are well fed by the anglo-whites propaganda. it's easy to fool indians as they are slaves to white people.

i believe the purpose for the creation of india as a nation by the british was to keep asia "in check". india is part of the anglo-whites long term strategy in the suppression of asia. the only counter to this is to break india up into multiple nations.
 
LOL, Manmohan Singh saying that Mumbai would catch up with Shanghai in 5 years. Time is up, where is it? :rofl:

In fact, Shanghai and Beijing appear on lists like this:

Global Financial Centres Index

But where are Mumbai and New Delhi? Don't worry, they rank highly on the list below:

Forbes.com - The World's 25 Dirtiest Cities

Yeah, so much about the superior Indian democracy, which produces nothing, but dirty slums across the entire nation.

---------- Post added at 06:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:34 PM ----------

and they will reply that everything is perfect and well because they are the worlds largest (fake) democracy and have freedom (to defecate anywhere they want). even though indians are physically starving, their minds are well fed by the anglo-whites propaganda. it's easy to fool indians as they are slaves to white people.

i believe the purpose for the creation of india as a nation by the british was to keep asia "in check". india is part of the anglo-whites long term strategy in the suppression of asia. the only counter to this is to break india up into multiple nations.

Yeah, for the long term peace in Asia, this Anglo-American backed saboteur regime must be broken into pieces.
 
Freedom? India? don't make me LOL the only rights and freedom your fake democracy has is the freedom to defecate anywhere (india is rank #1 is public defecation in the world; 65% of all indians openly defecate in the public). in china, that would be illegal. if that is the kind of freedom indians have, then trust me, nobody envy you guys.

there is absolutely nothing remotely tangible in comparison between india and china, hence the mindless praising of western ideals: "democracy" and "freedom", which india neither has. your fake democracy is a blanket put over your eyes to keep the 1.2 billion hungry indians from going ape. it is working nicely. your "free" press is also a joke. it is only free in the sense that indians do not pay for news. india as a country is built on deception, then again, india was never a country until the british turned you into one. perhaps it times to break india up into little pieces like europe.

You seems like a prime example of an adolescent hillbilly, who has grown up only on govt propaganda, forget about going to other countries but someone who never even steeped out of his village or even so much so as read even a neutral newspaper or magazine.
Hence your present sate of schizophrenic delusion though regrettable but is understandable..so Get Help!!
 
SINCE WE ALL LOVE CHINA! how about a referandum like we will have in scotland and wales ALSO IN TIBET, HK AND TAIWAN WITHOUGHT MISSILES BEING FIRED?
 
Back
Top Bottom