Thəorətic Muslim
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2012
- Messages
- 5,006
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
Google Fungibility, then continue.
Does it qualify you to claim the funds are 100% from Pakistan's treasury?
The amount of ambiguity is astounding.
If you use $100 take your son out to celebrate his birthday, and your mother gives you $100 for you to celebrate her grandson's birthday, who paid for the celebration then? That's the core question here..
American dollars as in the American government itself, from it's budget...
The CSF is reimbursement money for Pakistan's cooperation in the WoT. The world knows Pakistan can't hold a constant war with their given financials. That's why Pakistan is getting reimbursed, to a certain degree, so the International Community to not have to march into Pakistan's borders to take out terrorist camps. You're welcome to end your contribution on the WoT and see what happens.
As for how long it takes for Pakistan to get the CSF, ask your politicians and generals about that. As far as the average American is concerned the Taliban are walking around Lahore and Islamabad freely. That's your failure not my problem.
You should be thankful, with the pi$$ poor stupidity of your leadership former President Bush could have said no to the CSF but gave Pakistan a carrot so American troops wouldn't have to clear out FATA.
It's pretty sad that Pakistan's military budget requires IMF loans, which should be used to improve the economy, but hey... those who can't learn from the history of civilizations who focused more on military than the economy are bound to lose everything.
Any total price of any contract is paid per unit of equipment. The $900 million in F-16s would not have been paid in 1 payment, but rather spread over years.
Sure President Obama offered the F-16s for Pakistan, but we know how that turned out. But if you for 1 second believe the PAF will not bend over backwards to get a few F-16s come on...
"We'll look for other options" -Pakistan
Jordan selling 15 F-16s, few days later...
Even with all the "back-stabbing" by the US, who comes asking for weaponry?
I'm standing my ground that America is paying for these helicopters. The amount of ambiguity involved in the US-Pakistan relationship allows this. If there was no WoT, then these helicopters probably wouldn't have been offered, Pakistan would probably still have been sanctioned for the 98 tests.
For all the hate former President Bush gets, you all should thank him, he brought Pakistan back in the fold while Clinton exiled it...
So does it qualify you to make an assumption that CSF funds were used for the purchase of AH-1Z .... ???
Does it qualify you to claim the funds are 100% from Pakistan's treasury?
The amount of ambiguity is astounding.
If you use $100 take your son out to celebrate his birthday, and your mother gives you $100 for you to celebrate her grandson's birthday, who paid for the celebration then? That's the core question here..
Its obvious USA does not accept PKR .... plz don't post such illogical argument
American dollars as in the American government itself, from it's budget...
And for your kind information CSF is our own money which spend as per operational needs from our own defence budget & then get the REIMBURSEMENT which most of the time take TWO year previously there was a time when reimbursement took THREE years .... read about it
The CSF is reimbursement money for Pakistan's cooperation in the WoT. The world knows Pakistan can't hold a constant war with their given financials. That's why Pakistan is getting reimbursed, to a certain degree, so the International Community to not have to march into Pakistan's borders to take out terrorist camps. You're welcome to end your contribution on the WoT and see what happens.
As for how long it takes for Pakistan to get the CSF, ask your politicians and generals about that. As far as the average American is concerned the Taliban are walking around Lahore and Islamabad freely. That's your failure not my problem.
You should be thankful, with the pi$$ poor stupidity of your leadership former President Bush could have said no to the CSF but gave Pakistan a carrot so American troops wouldn't have to clear out FATA.
CSF & IMF loans have all to gather different economic dynamics .... whats your the point here .... ???
BTW these two are part of Pakistan's national Coffer .... what difference does it make to America ....??
And for your kind information CSF is our own money which spend as per operational needs from our own defence budget & then get the REIMBURSEMENT which most of the time take TWO year previously there was a time when reimbursement took THREE years .... read about it
& for FMF .... Approval from Congress is required can you post any such FUNDING approval for AH-1Z sales to PAKISTAN .... ??
It's pretty sad that Pakistan's military budget requires IMF loans, which should be used to improve the economy, but hey... those who can't learn from the history of civilizations who focused more on military than the economy are bound to lose everything.
Again this gem of yours .... what should one make out of it .... ???
literally I am just amazed with the height of ignorance in these two lines .... you have zilch knowledge about the subject & commenting as expert
DO have any idea what the word 'BUDGET' mean .... ??
BTW can you plz post any document or link of news article which can claim that THIS TIME IT WAS PAKISTAN WHO ASKED USA SALE F-16 .... ???
plz go & check it was your president who offered F-16 in his meeting with Pakistani PM who was on his visit to USA upon the invitation of you President .... this time Pakistan Air Force have different priority therefore her resources are committed to HOME GROWN SOLUTION otherwise arranging some additional +400 $ million was not an issue PAF had already committed 250 million for that purchase ....
Any total price of any contract is paid per unit of equipment. The $900 million in F-16s would not have been paid in 1 payment, but rather spread over years.
Sure President Obama offered the F-16s for Pakistan, but we know how that turned out. But if you for 1 second believe the PAF will not bend over backwards to get a few F-16s come on...
"We'll look for other options" -Pakistan
Jordan selling 15 F-16s, few days later...
Even with all the "back-stabbing" by the US, who comes asking for weaponry?
I'm standing my ground that America is paying for these helicopters. The amount of ambiguity involved in the US-Pakistan relationship allows this. If there was no WoT, then these helicopters probably wouldn't have been offered, Pakistan would probably still have been sanctioned for the 98 tests.
For all the hate former President Bush gets, you all should thank him, he brought Pakistan back in the fold while Clinton exiled it...
Last edited: