next time you post some thing, post it with a authentic link as source, and are these DOCTORS/Professors working and talking on behalf of ISRO, if not this is just some fools crazy thought and should not be considered by any one, and if this was never happened incident then, you are an idiot trying to widen the gap between INDIA and CHINA, which is on a daily basis getting reduced by economic co-operation.
Yeah...Let US know when China get to that level. Got any insights on why China is using dated technology and methods?Well, the space shuttle is a great concept, the transition to the future space plane, but that retired space shuttle sucks, better to come out with a better and safer design.
That's total b.s.
The U.S. no longer has the capability to send a man into space with capsule technology. The U.S. is currently re-experimenting with capsule technology for the Orion space capsule. Your point is crap.
This is very simple. Can China send people into space? Obviously "yes" with Shenzhou IX in orbit.
Can U.S. send a person into space with its own technology in the next three years? Definitely not.
Well okay then, the U.S. is behind China in manned launch space capability. This is a fact.
Orion space capsule undergoing water tests. The U.S. currently has no manned launch capability. Period. I hate whiners that keep making excuses. Facts don't change when you make a ridiculous excuse.
All spacecrafts are 'deathtraps' one way or another. You think using insulting rhetoric is going to make China look any smarter? Think about it. The capsule was a Western design and development. It has no methods of control while descent. It cannot be recycle, or at least not for now. Each mission is a total discard from launch to recovery. So give US a credible explanation as to why the capsule is not a deathtrap. Please refrain from using 'Chinese physics' doing so.No need to worry for us, China won't build a death trap for its own Taikonauts.
To train one costs a lot more than to build the machine.
they landed on the MOON far back in the 1970's DID THEY NOT? if they have already done then they have the technical no hows of how to reach outer space already and they are just working on how to increase the lifespan of the module over years to come
You really have no idea on what 'institutional memory' really mean, do you? It mean retained and recorded experiences for future generations. By the way, what China accomplished came from the institutional memory of Western and Soviet space experience. And that is how institutional memory enabled someone to have a generational leap and brag about it.
No, it mean defunct or obsolete. Not lost. Explain how is the current Chinese rockets are technologically superior to the Saturn series.
What kind of 'logic' is that?
Does that mean a wrecked Rolls is technologically inferior to a live and running Edsel?
