The NATO and Arab coalitions aren't bombing Jaish al Islam you inbred.
One things is clear you are a racist bigot and can not hold an intelligent conversation without resorting and acting like a juvenile. So far you have either called Russians or personally attacked me by using the following phrases: Bitches, f****rs (you actually spelled it out) baboons, retards, and inbreds.
@Serpentine @Oscar
Arab coalition in Yemen has killed more houthis than civilians, but that doesn't discount them from the civilians they killed. Nice job trying to change the subject btw.
Lets look at report and not make up things out of thin air. Now you can wipe the egg off your face and go hid under a rock.
Saudi strikes destroy Doctors Without Borders hospital in Yemen ...
More than 90 percent of those killed by the Yemen war have been civilians, according to a recent UN report, “State of Crisis, Explosive Weapons in Yemen.” At 2,200, the confirmed civilian death toll in Yemen surpassed total war related deaths in every other country worldwide this year, as of September 2015. Fully 93 percent of those killed by air-launched explosive weapons have been civilians, according to the UN.
93% of deaths and injuries in Yemen are civilian - this must ...
As a recent report,
State of Crisis: Explosive Weapons in Yemen (pdf) documents, more than 2,200 civilian deaths had been registered by September. “The intensity of explosive violence in the country has meant that
more civilian deaths and injuries from explosive weapons were recorded … during the first seven months of 2015 than in any other country in the world.”
Gotta love how Arabs are condemning Russia in Syria but are slaughtering civilians in Yemen. But what is new in regards to Arab incompetence?
"Russia hit a grouping of 20 tanks...." no proof of that.
There is a video released by the MOD although it is in a forested area and it is difficult to make out the type of vehicles. Nevertheless the video is out there and an official statement was made, which is far more proof of anything you have provided.
A "terrorist propaganda video" which shows a training exercise of Jaish al Islam's armor on September 16th. 14 armored vehicles participated, 11 tanks (T-72, T-62, T-55), 2 Shilkas, and 1 ARV. Now please, tell me, how is a live firing a "terrorist propaganda video?" That means all filmed live firings of every army in the world is a "terrorist propaganda video."
This is terrorist propaganda in the sense that we don't know when or where this video was taken for all anyone knows it could have been taken in 2013 or 2014 just about anywhere. That is where the propaganda lies, like i mentioned earlier there is countless propaganda from these terrorist groups, check out the "Jaish Alislam training camp" video and die from laughter or the ISIS 'navy seals' wanabe video. Using these dubious unconfirmed videos only further proves that you have no credibility.
Since when did FSA claim to assassinate any Russian general? lol.
There is a press conference with details and all, epic how the General shows up on public TV and calls the FSA liars
No. But neither can any of your claims. Of 60 videos published by Russian MoD, 48 were geolocated, only 1 targeted ISIS.
How can those videos be "geolocated" if most videos are either open dessert and in most cases in FLIR mode? Who is exactly geolocating them? And yes thank you for acknowledging that you can not confirm the authenticity of your terrorist propaganda video. In the mean time both the Russian ministry of defense and Syrian forces are confirming that Russian warplanes are destroying ISIS; they don't need to provide a video for every sortie that they fly which is over 1300 by now but there is enough video and daily briefings to know that ISIS is getting hammered.
There is confirmed reports from both the Russian ministry of Defense as well as Syrian military that Russia warplanes have been hitting the ISIS de-fact capital of Al-Raqqah, not to mention ISIS has been getting bombarded by Russian warplanes as Syrian forces are advancing from the west in a push to break the siege of the Kuweires military are base. There are many more reports of Russian hitting other areas in ISIS controlled territory but i guess because they don't have video footage for every single strike then it must be a lie right?
Oh yes, rebels got their MRLSs, Mortars, etc, morphed them into helicopters and airplanes, and then proceeded to bomb their own cities with said shape-shifting machines. You clearly are retarded, since a lot of the videos show the Russian planes actually dropping their ordnance.
the stupidity from you is off the charts. Both the Syrian army and "rebel" forces use mortars, MLRSs, artillery, ect, both sides use these weapons when they try to retake towns or cities, both sides use these weapons when they are under siege or being counter attacked. There is no difference between MLRS rocks, mortars or bombs dropped from aircraft, all do the same job and have similar results. As for aircraft "shape shifting" give proof that in everything one of those "attacks" aircraft were spotted, in at least some of those attacks i'm sure there there is video footage since everyone has camera phones these days. But of course there will be no evidence it's all speculation.
Maybe because Coalition airstrikes are done with F-16s, F-15s, F-18s...while Russian airstrikes are done with Su-34s, Su-25s, Su-24s, Mi-24s...
This is the stupidest argument i have seen yet. You are telling me that regular Syrians including women and children can tell the difference between an SU-34 and an F-16?
Apart from that most Russian aircraft such as the SU-34 and SU-24 and sometimes the SU-25 operate at altitudes where the aircraft are not visible to the human eye or they are so small that the type of aircraft can not be distinguished; moreover, many airstrikes are conducted
at night or in
cloud cover. It should also be noted that Russia does not operate MI-24s far outside their airbase and Syrian forces also use SU-24s as well as Mig-23s which look very similar from afar. Lets recap:
-Most civilians cant tell the difference between US aircraft or Russian.
-Russian aircraft often operate at altitudes where they are almost impossible to spot let alone make out the type of aircraft.
-Russian aircraft often operate at night.
-MI-24s are used to guard the Latakia base.
Syria uses both MI-24s and SU-24s.
MSF has already confirmed Russia hit 12 hospitals.
Civilians and Hospitals Repeatedly Attacked as Bombing Escalates in Northern Syria | MSF USA
I know what you're going to say, "MSF never said Russia did it!!!11!!111!!1!!1!," but unless you're telling me the coalition strikes rebel held areas in Aleppo, Idlib, Hama, and Homs governorates, they're Russian and/or Assad airstrikes.
No where in that report has the MSF confirmed that Russia hit anything. In fact i
t did not even mention Russia or airstrikes. The International Red cross has stated that it can not confirm that Russian airstrikes hit any hospitals. In all honesty i am not surprised that you are lying since you have done it many times before just like with your Yemen airstrikes claim.
